在沙特阿拉伯的婴儿人群中,牛奶和骆驼奶之间的交叉反应

A. Aburiziza
{"title":"在沙特阿拉伯的婴儿人群中,牛奶和骆驼奶之间的交叉反应","authors":"A. Aburiziza","doi":"10.35841/0971-9032.24.1.175-179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: One of the most common types of allergy in the early childhood is cow’s milk allergy (CMA). Patients suffering from CMA may show severe allergic responses and therefore they have to follow a strict diet. Camel’s milk is different in protein composition as compared to cow’s milk and could be used as its substitute. Thus, in the present study we tried to identify patients with CMA and camel milk allergy and their cross reactivity in the Saudi Arabian infant population. Method: The patients below 2 years of age and diagnosed with CMA were recruited from two different hospitals of Saudi Arabia. Also demographic data were collected for all the patients. Electronic chart were reviewed for food allergy, milk allergy and anaphylaxis shock using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding process. Results: A total of 112 patients were recruited for the study with male to female ratio of 1:33. The clinical presentations showed by the participants were atopic dermatitis (24%), chronic diarrhea (21%), anaphylaxis (16%), poor weight gain (16%), chronic vomiting (11%) and urticaria (5%). 108 patients showed positive results for Cow milk’s skin prick test and 2 patients showed positive Camel milk skin prick test. The cross reactivity between CMA and camel milk was low i.e., 108 to 2 prospectively. The Cow’s milk specific IgE was positive in 92% of participants with 25 ± 34 KU/L. Conclusion: If we can confirm positive CMA and confirm negative camel allergy by oral challenge, the results will be more reliable, and possibly we can determine the safety for suggesting camel milk for children suffering from CMA.","PeriodicalId":11183,"journal":{"name":"Current Pediatric Research","volume":"52 1","pages":"175-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross reactivity between Cow’s and Camel’s milk in the infant population of Saudi Arabia\",\"authors\":\"A. Aburiziza\",\"doi\":\"10.35841/0971-9032.24.1.175-179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: One of the most common types of allergy in the early childhood is cow’s milk allergy (CMA). Patients suffering from CMA may show severe allergic responses and therefore they have to follow a strict diet. Camel’s milk is different in protein composition as compared to cow’s milk and could be used as its substitute. Thus, in the present study we tried to identify patients with CMA and camel milk allergy and their cross reactivity in the Saudi Arabian infant population. Method: The patients below 2 years of age and diagnosed with CMA were recruited from two different hospitals of Saudi Arabia. Also demographic data were collected for all the patients. Electronic chart were reviewed for food allergy, milk allergy and anaphylaxis shock using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding process. Results: A total of 112 patients were recruited for the study with male to female ratio of 1:33. The clinical presentations showed by the participants were atopic dermatitis (24%), chronic diarrhea (21%), anaphylaxis (16%), poor weight gain (16%), chronic vomiting (11%) and urticaria (5%). 108 patients showed positive results for Cow milk’s skin prick test and 2 patients showed positive Camel milk skin prick test. The cross reactivity between CMA and camel milk was low i.e., 108 to 2 prospectively. The Cow’s milk specific IgE was positive in 92% of participants with 25 ± 34 KU/L. Conclusion: If we can confirm positive CMA and confirm negative camel allergy by oral challenge, the results will be more reliable, and possibly we can determine the safety for suggesting camel milk for children suffering from CMA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Pediatric Research\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"175-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Pediatric Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35841/0971-9032.24.1.175-179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35841/0971-9032.24.1.175-179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:儿童早期最常见的过敏类型之一是牛奶过敏(CMA)。患有CMA的患者可能会表现出严重的过敏反应,因此他们必须遵循严格的饮食。骆驼奶的蛋白质成分与牛奶不同,可以作为牛奶的替代品。因此,在本研究中,我们试图在沙特阿拉伯婴儿人群中识别CMA和骆驼奶过敏患者及其交叉反应。方法:从沙特阿拉伯两家不同医院招募年龄在2岁以下且确诊为CMA的患者。同时收集了所有患者的人口统计数据。采用国际疾病分类(ICD)编码程序对食物过敏、牛奶过敏和过敏性休克的电子图表进行了综述。结果:共纳入112例患者,男女比例为1:33。参与者的临床表现为特应性皮炎(24%)、慢性腹泻(21%)、过敏反应(16%)、体重增加不佳(16%)、慢性呕吐(11%)和荨麻疹(5%)。牛乳皮刺试验阳性108例,驼乳皮刺试验阳性2例。CMA与驼奶的交叉反应性较低,预期为108 ~ 2。牛奶特异性IgE阳性率为92%(25±34 KU/L)。结论:如果能通过口服激射法确认CMA阳性和骆驼过敏阴性,结果将更加可靠,并可能为CMA患儿推荐骆驼奶的安全性提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross reactivity between Cow’s and Camel’s milk in the infant population of Saudi Arabia
Objective: One of the most common types of allergy in the early childhood is cow’s milk allergy (CMA). Patients suffering from CMA may show severe allergic responses and therefore they have to follow a strict diet. Camel’s milk is different in protein composition as compared to cow’s milk and could be used as its substitute. Thus, in the present study we tried to identify patients with CMA and camel milk allergy and their cross reactivity in the Saudi Arabian infant population. Method: The patients below 2 years of age and diagnosed with CMA were recruited from two different hospitals of Saudi Arabia. Also demographic data were collected for all the patients. Electronic chart were reviewed for food allergy, milk allergy and anaphylaxis shock using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding process. Results: A total of 112 patients were recruited for the study with male to female ratio of 1:33. The clinical presentations showed by the participants were atopic dermatitis (24%), chronic diarrhea (21%), anaphylaxis (16%), poor weight gain (16%), chronic vomiting (11%) and urticaria (5%). 108 patients showed positive results for Cow milk’s skin prick test and 2 patients showed positive Camel milk skin prick test. The cross reactivity between CMA and camel milk was low i.e., 108 to 2 prospectively. The Cow’s milk specific IgE was positive in 92% of participants with 25 ± 34 KU/L. Conclusion: If we can confirm positive CMA and confirm negative camel allergy by oral challenge, the results will be more reliable, and possibly we can determine the safety for suggesting camel milk for children suffering from CMA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Pediatric Research
Current Pediatric Research Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: Current Pediatric Research is an interdisciplinary Research Journal for publication of original research work in all major disciplines of Pediatric Research. The objective of the journal is to provide a scientific communication medium to discuss the utmost advancements in the domain of Pediatric Research. This journal aims to assemble and reserve precise, specific, detailed data on this immensely diversified subject. Current Pediatric Research is scientific open access journal that specifies the development activities conducted in the field of pediatric research. This journal encompasses the study related to different diversified aspects in pediatric research such as Pediatric Nursing, pediatric emergency care, pediatric nephrology, pediatric pulmonology, pediatric psychology, pediatric dental care, pediatric diabetes, pediatric stroke, pediatric healthcare, pediatric congenital heart disease, pediatric trauma and many more relevant fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信