基于超声引导下芯针活检诊断乳腺肿块的超声、乳腺x线检查报告与病理报告的一致性评价

F. Fakoor, A. Etezadi, Khoosheh Rassam, A. Salary, D. Pourmarzi, N. Bodaghi
{"title":"基于超声引导下芯针活检诊断乳腺肿块的超声、乳腺x线检查报告与病理报告的一致性评价","authors":"F. Fakoor, A. Etezadi, Khoosheh Rassam, A. Salary, D. Pourmarzi, N. Bodaghi","doi":"10.35248/har.2019.8.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Screening programs for the early diagnosis of breast cancer lead to perform several biopsies in order to determine the breast abnormalities found in sonography and mammography. According to gradually replacement of core needle biopsy instead of more invasive methods like open surgical biopsy, it seems necessary to study the concordance between biopsy results and non-invasive diagnostic methods in order to clarify ambiguous results and confirm the reliability of non-invasive methods. Objective: The objective of this study was to match the sonography and mammography reports with core needle biopsy in patients referred to Sahand core needle biopsy center. Materials and methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was performed on 240 patients referred to Sahand Center with sonography or mammography reports or by a surgeon for core needle biopsy. All the patients were examined by a gynecologist assistant and were asked about demographic information and their recent diseases. The matched sonography or mammography cases with pathology reports and positive predictive value based on comparison between them and pathology report were determined as standard diagnostic criteria. Then, data were statistically analyzed by SPSS v.21 software. Results: In this study, there was no statistically significant difference between sonography or mammography and pathology reports for categorizing patients in two distinct malignant and benign groups (p>0.05). There was also no difference observed in two age groups (p>0.05). In both sonography and mammography groups, the sensitivity and specificity were 60.32% and 92.96%, respectively. Moreover, the positive and negative predictive values of sonography and mammography were the same in both methods and were 70.37% and 86.56%, respectively. Conclusion: According to the significant concordance between sonographyand mammography with core needle biopsy, these non-invasive methods can be helpful in diagnosing malignant lesions and differentiating them from benign lesions; they are also affordable and available. The attention to underlying variables such as age, can improve sensitivity and specificity of non-invasive methods in comparison to invasive diagnostic methods.g.","PeriodicalId":90841,"journal":{"name":"Healthy aging research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the accordance between sonography and mammography reports with pathology report based on sonographic guided core needle biopsy in diagnosis of breast masses\",\"authors\":\"F. Fakoor, A. Etezadi, Khoosheh Rassam, A. Salary, D. Pourmarzi, N. Bodaghi\",\"doi\":\"10.35248/har.2019.8.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Screening programs for the early diagnosis of breast cancer lead to perform several biopsies in order to determine the breast abnormalities found in sonography and mammography. According to gradually replacement of core needle biopsy instead of more invasive methods like open surgical biopsy, it seems necessary to study the concordance between biopsy results and non-invasive diagnostic methods in order to clarify ambiguous results and confirm the reliability of non-invasive methods. Objective: The objective of this study was to match the sonography and mammography reports with core needle biopsy in patients referred to Sahand core needle biopsy center. Materials and methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was performed on 240 patients referred to Sahand Center with sonography or mammography reports or by a surgeon for core needle biopsy. All the patients were examined by a gynecologist assistant and were asked about demographic information and their recent diseases. The matched sonography or mammography cases with pathology reports and positive predictive value based on comparison between them and pathology report were determined as standard diagnostic criteria. Then, data were statistically analyzed by SPSS v.21 software. Results: In this study, there was no statistically significant difference between sonography or mammography and pathology reports for categorizing patients in two distinct malignant and benign groups (p>0.05). There was also no difference observed in two age groups (p>0.05). In both sonography and mammography groups, the sensitivity and specificity were 60.32% and 92.96%, respectively. Moreover, the positive and negative predictive values of sonography and mammography were the same in both methods and were 70.37% and 86.56%, respectively. Conclusion: According to the significant concordance between sonographyand mammography with core needle biopsy, these non-invasive methods can be helpful in diagnosing malignant lesions and differentiating them from benign lesions; they are also affordable and available. The attention to underlying variables such as age, can improve sensitivity and specificity of non-invasive methods in comparison to invasive diagnostic methods.g.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthy aging research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthy aging research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35248/har.2019.8.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthy aging research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/har.2019.8.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期诊断乳腺癌的筛查项目需要进行多次活组织检查,以确定超声和乳房x光检查中发现的乳腺异常。随着核心针活检逐渐取代开放性手术等更具侵入性的方法,研究活检结果与非侵入性诊断方法的一致性,以澄清歧义结果,确认非侵入性方法的可靠性似乎是必要的。目的:本研究的目的是将Sahand核心针活检中心的患者的超声和乳房x线摄影报告与核心针活检相匹配。材料和方法:这项前瞻性横断面研究对240名患者进行了研究,这些患者有超声或乳房x光检查报告,或由外科医生进行核心针活检。所有患者都由一名妇科助理进行检查,并被问及人口统计信息和他们最近的疾病。超声或乳房x线检查与病理报告相匹配,经与病理报告比较预测阳性的病例作为标准诊断标准。然后用SPSS v.21软件对数据进行统计分析。结果:在本研究中,超声或乳房x线检查与病理报告对两组不同恶性和良性患者的分类差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。超声组和乳腺x线组的敏感性和特异性分别为60.32%和92.96%。超声和乳腺x线检查的阳性预测值和阴性预测值相同,分别为70.37%和86.56%。结论:超声与乳房x线穿刺活检具有明显的一致性,这些无创方法有助于诊断恶性病变并与良性病变鉴别;他们也负担得起和可用。与有创诊断方法相比,对年龄等潜在变量的关注可以提高非侵入性诊断方法的敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the accordance between sonography and mammography reports with pathology report based on sonographic guided core needle biopsy in diagnosis of breast masses
Background: Screening programs for the early diagnosis of breast cancer lead to perform several biopsies in order to determine the breast abnormalities found in sonography and mammography. According to gradually replacement of core needle biopsy instead of more invasive methods like open surgical biopsy, it seems necessary to study the concordance between biopsy results and non-invasive diagnostic methods in order to clarify ambiguous results and confirm the reliability of non-invasive methods. Objective: The objective of this study was to match the sonography and mammography reports with core needle biopsy in patients referred to Sahand core needle biopsy center. Materials and methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was performed on 240 patients referred to Sahand Center with sonography or mammography reports or by a surgeon for core needle biopsy. All the patients were examined by a gynecologist assistant and were asked about demographic information and their recent diseases. The matched sonography or mammography cases with pathology reports and positive predictive value based on comparison between them and pathology report were determined as standard diagnostic criteria. Then, data were statistically analyzed by SPSS v.21 software. Results: In this study, there was no statistically significant difference between sonography or mammography and pathology reports for categorizing patients in two distinct malignant and benign groups (p>0.05). There was also no difference observed in two age groups (p>0.05). In both sonography and mammography groups, the sensitivity and specificity were 60.32% and 92.96%, respectively. Moreover, the positive and negative predictive values of sonography and mammography were the same in both methods and were 70.37% and 86.56%, respectively. Conclusion: According to the significant concordance between sonographyand mammography with core needle biopsy, these non-invasive methods can be helpful in diagnosing malignant lesions and differentiating them from benign lesions; they are also affordable and available. The attention to underlying variables such as age, can improve sensitivity and specificity of non-invasive methods in comparison to invasive diagnostic methods.g.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信