浮法玻璃厂职业病危害控制效果分析

Jinquan Chen, Qibing Lu, F. Huang, Jianming Tan, Shao-wei Wu, Yanfen Xu
{"title":"浮法玻璃厂职业病危害控制效果分析","authors":"Jinquan Chen, Qibing Lu, F. Huang, Jianming Tan, Shao-wei Wu, Yanfen Xu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-1245.2014.24.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To explore the hazard control effect of occupation disease at a float glass factory.Methods Occupational hygienic investigation,occupational hazards and protecting facilities for occupational hazards detection,and occupational health examination were used to evaluate the control effect of occupational hazards.Results The major hazard factors causing occupation diseases were dust,noise,high temperature,chemical toxicants (ammonia,carbon monoxide,carbon dioxide,nitrogen dioxide,sulfur dioxide,two tin oxide,and non-methane total hydrocarbon),and electromagnetic field.Free silica dust in 13 copies (SiO2) of contents was average (34.51 ± 27.38)% (2.65% ~ 71.74%).Total dust concentration was detected at 41 points,with a qualified rate of 95.12% (39/41).The intensity of noise was detected at 32 points,with a qualified rate of 93.75% (30/32).Chemical toxicant concentrations were detected at 66 points,with a qualified rate of 100.00%.High temperature test was carried out at 8 points,of which 4 points (50.00%) were over the occupation contact limiting value.The detection results of power frequency electric field strength were all qualified.The face velocity of occupation disease prevention facilities was 0.03 ~ 3.26 m/s.389 people took occupation health examination; no one were suspected with occupation disease,and 3 were found with high temperature or noise operation contraindication.Conclusions The occupation disease harm at chemical toxicants and power frequency electric field is controlled well.The control effect of dust and noise hazards is good.The harm of high temperature control effect is poor.Prevention and control work of high temperature,noise,and dust hazards needs to be enhanced. \n \nKey words: \nOccupation hazards;  Control effect analysis;  Chemical poisons;  Dust;  Noise","PeriodicalId":14405,"journal":{"name":"国际医药卫生导报","volume":"20 1","pages":"3708-3712"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hazard control effect of occupation disease at a float glass factory\",\"authors\":\"Jinquan Chen, Qibing Lu, F. Huang, Jianming Tan, Shao-wei Wu, Yanfen Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-1245.2014.24.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective To explore the hazard control effect of occupation disease at a float glass factory.Methods Occupational hygienic investigation,occupational hazards and protecting facilities for occupational hazards detection,and occupational health examination were used to evaluate the control effect of occupational hazards.Results The major hazard factors causing occupation diseases were dust,noise,high temperature,chemical toxicants (ammonia,carbon monoxide,carbon dioxide,nitrogen dioxide,sulfur dioxide,two tin oxide,and non-methane total hydrocarbon),and electromagnetic field.Free silica dust in 13 copies (SiO2) of contents was average (34.51 ± 27.38)% (2.65% ~ 71.74%).Total dust concentration was detected at 41 points,with a qualified rate of 95.12% (39/41).The intensity of noise was detected at 32 points,with a qualified rate of 93.75% (30/32).Chemical toxicant concentrations were detected at 66 points,with a qualified rate of 100.00%.High temperature test was carried out at 8 points,of which 4 points (50.00%) were over the occupation contact limiting value.The detection results of power frequency electric field strength were all qualified.The face velocity of occupation disease prevention facilities was 0.03 ~ 3.26 m/s.389 people took occupation health examination; no one were suspected with occupation disease,and 3 were found with high temperature or noise operation contraindication.Conclusions The occupation disease harm at chemical toxicants and power frequency electric field is controlled well.The control effect of dust and noise hazards is good.The harm of high temperature control effect is poor.Prevention and control work of high temperature,noise,and dust hazards needs to be enhanced. \\n \\nKey words: \\nOccupation hazards;  Control effect analysis;  Chemical poisons;  Dust;  Noise\",\"PeriodicalId\":14405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"国际医药卫生导报\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"3708-3712\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"国际医药卫生导报\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-1245.2014.24.014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"国际医药卫生导报","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-1245.2014.24.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨某浮法玻璃厂职业病危害控制效果。方法采用职业卫生调查、职业危害及防护设施检测、职业健康检查等方法评价职业危害控制效果。结果造成职业病的主要危害因素为粉尘、噪声、高温、化学毒物(氨、一氧化碳、二氧化碳、二氧化氮、二氧化硫、二氧化锡和非甲烷总烃)和电磁场。游离硅尘在13份(SiO2)中含量平均为(34.51±27.38)%(2.65% ~ 71.74%)。共检测总粉尘浓度41个点,合格率为95.12%(39/41)。在32个点检测噪声强度,合格率为93.75%(30/32)。检测化学毒物浓度66个点,合格率为100.00%。在8个点进行高温试验,其中4个点(50.00%)超过职业接触限值。工频电场强度检测结果均合格。职业病防治设施面速度为0.03 ~ 3.26 m/s。职业健康检查389人;无一例疑似职业病,3例存在高温、噪声操作禁忌。结论化学毒物和工频电场对职业病危害控制较好。对粉尘、噪声危害的治理效果良好。高温危害控制效果差。加强高温、噪声、粉尘等危害的防治工作。关键词:职业危害;控制效果分析;化学毒物;尘埃;噪音
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hazard control effect of occupation disease at a float glass factory
Objective To explore the hazard control effect of occupation disease at a float glass factory.Methods Occupational hygienic investigation,occupational hazards and protecting facilities for occupational hazards detection,and occupational health examination were used to evaluate the control effect of occupational hazards.Results The major hazard factors causing occupation diseases were dust,noise,high temperature,chemical toxicants (ammonia,carbon monoxide,carbon dioxide,nitrogen dioxide,sulfur dioxide,two tin oxide,and non-methane total hydrocarbon),and electromagnetic field.Free silica dust in 13 copies (SiO2) of contents was average (34.51 ± 27.38)% (2.65% ~ 71.74%).Total dust concentration was detected at 41 points,with a qualified rate of 95.12% (39/41).The intensity of noise was detected at 32 points,with a qualified rate of 93.75% (30/32).Chemical toxicant concentrations were detected at 66 points,with a qualified rate of 100.00%.High temperature test was carried out at 8 points,of which 4 points (50.00%) were over the occupation contact limiting value.The detection results of power frequency electric field strength were all qualified.The face velocity of occupation disease prevention facilities was 0.03 ~ 3.26 m/s.389 people took occupation health examination; no one were suspected with occupation disease,and 3 were found with high temperature or noise operation contraindication.Conclusions The occupation disease harm at chemical toxicants and power frequency electric field is controlled well.The control effect of dust and noise hazards is good.The harm of high temperature control effect is poor.Prevention and control work of high temperature,noise,and dust hazards needs to be enhanced. Key words: Occupation hazards;  Control effect analysis;  Chemical poisons;  Dust;  Noise
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26723
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信