图书馆信息服务中的会话与话语分析

IF 0.7 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
M. Forrester, Christopher A. H. Ramsden, D. Reason
{"title":"图书馆信息服务中的会话与话语分析","authors":"M. Forrester, Christopher A. H. Ramsden, D. Reason","doi":"10.3233/EFI-1997-15402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research interview constitutes one of the main methods for obtaining information from library users. Typically, interviews are now recorded and then analysed later by the interviewer. In this paper we consider the advantages and disadvantages of using discourse and conversation analysis when examining users' responses. We focus upon two concrete examples; a study employing discourse analysis when re-designing;an index, and research in which conversation analysis is used as part of the evaluation procedure for interface design. Our suggestion is that discourse analysis is particularly useful when seeking information of a general nature, whereas conversation analysis has the advantage of uncovering implicit models and metaphors employed by people when using library services. Our primary aim in this paper is to highlight some of the costs and benefits of utilising discourse and conversation analytic methods for library staff.","PeriodicalId":51668,"journal":{"name":"EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION","volume":"15 1","pages":"283-295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/EFI-1997-15402","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conversation and discourse analysis in library and information services\",\"authors\":\"M. Forrester, Christopher A. H. Ramsden, D. Reason\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/EFI-1997-15402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research interview constitutes one of the main methods for obtaining information from library users. Typically, interviews are now recorded and then analysed later by the interviewer. In this paper we consider the advantages and disadvantages of using discourse and conversation analysis when examining users' responses. We focus upon two concrete examples; a study employing discourse analysis when re-designing;an index, and research in which conversation analysis is used as part of the evaluation procedure for interface design. Our suggestion is that discourse analysis is particularly useful when seeking information of a general nature, whereas conversation analysis has the advantage of uncovering implicit models and metaphors employed by people when using library services. Our primary aim in this paper is to highlight some of the costs and benefits of utilising discourse and conversation analytic methods for library staff.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"283-295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/EFI-1997-15402\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-1997-15402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-1997-15402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

研究性访谈是获取图书馆用户信息的主要方法之一。通常,面试会被记录下来,然后由面试官进行分析。在本文中,我们考虑了使用话语和会话分析来检查用户的反应的优点和缺点。我们集中讨论两个具体的例子;一项在重新设计时使用话语分析的研究;一项索引,以及将对话分析作为界面设计评估程序的一部分的研究。我们的建议是,话语分析在寻找一般性质的信息时特别有用,而会话分析在揭示人们在使用图书馆服务时使用的隐含模型和隐喻方面具有优势。我们在本文中的主要目的是强调图书馆工作人员使用话语和对话分析方法的一些成本和好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conversation and discourse analysis in library and information services
The research interview constitutes one of the main methods for obtaining information from library users. Typically, interviews are now recorded and then analysed later by the interviewer. In this paper we consider the advantages and disadvantages of using discourse and conversation analysis when examining users' responses. We focus upon two concrete examples; a study employing discourse analysis when re-designing;an index, and research in which conversation analysis is used as part of the evaluation procedure for interface design. Our suggestion is that discourse analysis is particularly useful when seeking information of a general nature, whereas conversation analysis has the advantage of uncovering implicit models and metaphors employed by people when using library services. Our primary aim in this paper is to highlight some of the costs and benefits of utilising discourse and conversation analytic methods for library staff.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION
EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Information is widely recognized as a vital resource in economic development. The skills of information handling traditionally associated with libraries, are now in great demand in all sectors, including government, business and commerce. The education and training of information professionals is, therefore, an issue of growing significance. Education for Information has been since 1983 a forum for debate and discussion on education and training issues in the sphere of information handling. It includes refereed full-length articles and short communications on matters of current concern to educators and practitioners alike. Its News section reports on significant activities and events in the international arena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信