在冠状病毒大流行的背景下,GIS绘制了2020-2021年欧洲的超额死亡率

Anton Mushtaykin, S. Teslenok, I. Semina, Samat Ilkaev
{"title":"在冠状病毒大流行的背景下,GIS绘制了2020-2021年欧洲的超额死亡率","authors":"Anton Mushtaykin, S. Teslenok, I. Semina, Samat Ilkaev","doi":"10.35595/2414-9179-2022-2-28-332-346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first officially recorded case of severe acute respiratory infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (2019-nCoV) was reported in the People’s Republic of China in late 2019. Since then, the virus has spread rapidly across the planet. On 30 January 2020. The World Health Organization (WHO) designated the outbreak as an emergency and as early as 30 March 2020 it declared the disease a pandemic, named COVID-19. At the beginning of April 2022 there were more than 500 million cases and 6 million deaths according to this organization. The latter figure however immediately raised questions—among doctors and scientists alike—as it has not yet been possible to develop a uniform approach to its recording around the world. Therefore, in this paper, the choice of the excess mortality indicator is justified in its mapping presentation, whose main advantage is that it can be used to represent both the losses from COVID-19 itself and the consequences of the increased burden on public health systems. The visualization of such data using modern geo-information technology is relevant both at present, against the background of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and in the future, when dealing with its consequences. The main specificity of the territory under study—Europe (including both countries wholly located in this part of the world and parts of it—including Kazakhstan, Russia and Turkey, as well as Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia and Cyprus, geographically located in Asia)—is sufficient similarity of basic demographic indicators of countries with different approaches to pandemic control applied in each of them. This enables us to use maps to highlight whether they have been successful in this area in the most straightforward way. The geo-referenced mapping materials can be used for further, more in-depth analysis and visualization of coronavirus data using cartographic research at the level of individual states and their smaller jurisdictions.","PeriodicalId":31498,"journal":{"name":"InterCarto InterGIS","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GIS mapping excess mortality in Europe in 2020–2021 on the background of the coronavirus pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Anton Mushtaykin, S. Teslenok, I. Semina, Samat Ilkaev\",\"doi\":\"10.35595/2414-9179-2022-2-28-332-346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The first officially recorded case of severe acute respiratory infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (2019-nCoV) was reported in the People’s Republic of China in late 2019. Since then, the virus has spread rapidly across the planet. On 30 January 2020. The World Health Organization (WHO) designated the outbreak as an emergency and as early as 30 March 2020 it declared the disease a pandemic, named COVID-19. At the beginning of April 2022 there were more than 500 million cases and 6 million deaths according to this organization. The latter figure however immediately raised questions—among doctors and scientists alike—as it has not yet been possible to develop a uniform approach to its recording around the world. Therefore, in this paper, the choice of the excess mortality indicator is justified in its mapping presentation, whose main advantage is that it can be used to represent both the losses from COVID-19 itself and the consequences of the increased burden on public health systems. The visualization of such data using modern geo-information technology is relevant both at present, against the background of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and in the future, when dealing with its consequences. The main specificity of the territory under study—Europe (including both countries wholly located in this part of the world and parts of it—including Kazakhstan, Russia and Turkey, as well as Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia and Cyprus, geographically located in Asia)—is sufficient similarity of basic demographic indicators of countries with different approaches to pandemic control applied in each of them. This enables us to use maps to highlight whether they have been successful in this area in the most straightforward way. The geo-referenced mapping materials can be used for further, more in-depth analysis and visualization of coronavirus data using cartographic research at the level of individual states and their smaller jurisdictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"InterCarto InterGIS\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"InterCarto InterGIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2022-2-28-332-346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InterCarto InterGIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2022-2-28-332-346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年底,中华人民共和国报告了第一例正式记录的由SARS-CoV-2冠状病毒(2019- ncov)引起的严重急性呼吸道感染病例。从那时起,该病毒在全球迅速传播。2020年1月30日。世界卫生组织(世卫组织)早在2020年3月30日就宣布疫情为紧急疫情,并将其命名为COVID-19。据该组织称,到2022年4月初,有5亿多例病例和600万例死亡。然而,后一个数字立即引起了医生和科学家的质疑,因为还不可能在世界范围内制定统一的方法来记录它。因此,在本文中,选择超额死亡率指标是合理的,其主要优势在于,它既可以用来表示COVID-19本身的损失,也可以用来表示公共卫生系统负担增加的后果。利用现代地理信息技术对这些数据进行可视化处理,无论是在当前COVID-19大流行的背景下,还是在未来处理其后果时,都具有重要意义。所研究的领土- -欧洲(包括完全位于世界这一地区的两个国家和部分地区- -包括哈萨克斯坦、俄罗斯和土耳其,以及地理上位于亚洲的阿塞拜疆、亚美尼亚、格鲁吉亚和塞浦路斯)- -的主要特点是,各国的基本人口指标足够相似,每个国家采用不同的流行病控制办法。这使我们能够使用地图以最直接的方式突出他们是否在该地区取得了成功。地理参考制图材料可用于通过各州及其较小司法管辖区的制图研究,对冠状病毒数据进行进一步、更深入的分析和可视化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
GIS mapping excess mortality in Europe in 2020–2021 on the background of the coronavirus pandemic
The first officially recorded case of severe acute respiratory infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (2019-nCoV) was reported in the People’s Republic of China in late 2019. Since then, the virus has spread rapidly across the planet. On 30 January 2020. The World Health Organization (WHO) designated the outbreak as an emergency and as early as 30 March 2020 it declared the disease a pandemic, named COVID-19. At the beginning of April 2022 there were more than 500 million cases and 6 million deaths according to this organization. The latter figure however immediately raised questions—among doctors and scientists alike—as it has not yet been possible to develop a uniform approach to its recording around the world. Therefore, in this paper, the choice of the excess mortality indicator is justified in its mapping presentation, whose main advantage is that it can be used to represent both the losses from COVID-19 itself and the consequences of the increased burden on public health systems. The visualization of such data using modern geo-information technology is relevant both at present, against the background of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and in the future, when dealing with its consequences. The main specificity of the territory under study—Europe (including both countries wholly located in this part of the world and parts of it—including Kazakhstan, Russia and Turkey, as well as Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia and Cyprus, geographically located in Asia)—is sufficient similarity of basic demographic indicators of countries with different approaches to pandemic control applied in each of them. This enables us to use maps to highlight whether they have been successful in this area in the most straightforward way. The geo-referenced mapping materials can be used for further, more in-depth analysis and visualization of coronavirus data using cartographic research at the level of individual states and their smaller jurisdictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信