遵从还是不遵从

Małgorzata Gamian-Wilk, Kamila Madeja-Bień, Brita Bjørkelo
{"title":"遵从还是不遵从","authors":"Małgorzata Gamian-Wilk, Kamila Madeja-Bień, Brita Bjørkelo","doi":"10.34862/FO.2020.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies indicate that social exclusion reduction in prosocial behavior. However, ostracized participants tend to be more susceptible to social influence attempts. The current studies examined the effect of exclusion on compliance. In line with the need threat model of ostracism, the results indicate a decrease in mood and needs after being excluded. The compliance rate was generally greater among rejected participants (study 1). The tendency to engage in volunteering was, however, higher when participants were asked to engage in a collective (vs. individual) task, which was to be performed with other participants, than the source of ostracism (study 2). These results align with other findings indicating that people tend to respond aggressively rather than prosocially towards rejecters and tend to restore threatened needs by making new friends. keywords: ostracism, exclusion, rejection, Cyberball, social influence, compliance, volunteering https://doi.org/10.34862/fo.2020.2.3","PeriodicalId":53304,"journal":{"name":"Forum Oswiatowe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To Comply or Not To Comply\",\"authors\":\"Małgorzata Gamian-Wilk, Kamila Madeja-Bień, Brita Bjørkelo\",\"doi\":\"10.34862/FO.2020.2.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previous studies indicate that social exclusion reduction in prosocial behavior. However, ostracized participants tend to be more susceptible to social influence attempts. The current studies examined the effect of exclusion on compliance. In line with the need threat model of ostracism, the results indicate a decrease in mood and needs after being excluded. The compliance rate was generally greater among rejected participants (study 1). The tendency to engage in volunteering was, however, higher when participants were asked to engage in a collective (vs. individual) task, which was to be performed with other participants, than the source of ostracism (study 2). These results align with other findings indicating that people tend to respond aggressively rather than prosocially towards rejecters and tend to restore threatened needs by making new friends. keywords: ostracism, exclusion, rejection, Cyberball, social influence, compliance, volunteering https://doi.org/10.34862/fo.2020.2.3\",\"PeriodicalId\":53304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forum Oswiatowe\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forum Oswiatowe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34862/FO.2020.2.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum Oswiatowe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34862/FO.2020.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

以往的研究表明,社会排斥会降低亲社会行为。然而,被排斥的参与者往往更容易受到社会影响的影响。目前的研究考察了排斥对依从性的影响。与被排斥的需求威胁模型一致,结果表明被排斥后情绪和需求有所下降。在被拒绝的参与者中,遵从率通常更高(研究1)。然而,当参与者被要求参与一项集体(相对于个人)任务时,参与志愿服务的倾向更高,该任务将与其他参与者一起完成。这些结果与其他研究结果一致,表明人们倾向于对被拒绝者做出积极的反应,而不是亲社会的反应,并倾向于通过结交新朋友来恢复受到威胁的需求。关键词:排斥,排斥,赛博球,社会影响,依从性,志愿服务https://doi.org/10.34862/fo.2020.2.3
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
To Comply or Not To Comply
Previous studies indicate that social exclusion reduction in prosocial behavior. However, ostracized participants tend to be more susceptible to social influence attempts. The current studies examined the effect of exclusion on compliance. In line with the need threat model of ostracism, the results indicate a decrease in mood and needs after being excluded. The compliance rate was generally greater among rejected participants (study 1). The tendency to engage in volunteering was, however, higher when participants were asked to engage in a collective (vs. individual) task, which was to be performed with other participants, than the source of ostracism (study 2). These results align with other findings indicating that people tend to respond aggressively rather than prosocially towards rejecters and tend to restore threatened needs by making new friends. keywords: ostracism, exclusion, rejection, Cyberball, social influence, compliance, volunteering https://doi.org/10.34862/fo.2020.2.3
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信