{"title":"新世界鸟类濒危的模式和原因","authors":"N. Collar, D. Wege, A. Long","doi":"10.2307/40157536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Threatened birds of the Americas (1992) detailed 327 species, of which only four had ranges entirely outside the Neotropics, showing how important this latter region is for global bird conservation, contributing 30% of all threatened birds on earth. Brazil had 97 threatened species, Peru 64, and Colombia 56. These countries, plus Mexico, held three-quarters of all threatened birds in the Americas. Over 78% (256) of all threatened bird species possessed ranges of less than 50,000 km2. Some 57% of all threatened birds were confined to wet forest, 17% to dry forest, and 10% to grasslands, a rapidly disappearing habitat type. Over 76% suffered from loss of habitat (for 49% this is the only threat); 16% and 11% suffered significantly from hunting and trade respectively, and 8% were threatened as a function of their restricted ranges. Roughly 30% (twice as many as in Africa) were Endangered (highest category), another 30% divided equally between Indeterminate and Vulnerable, 30% were Rare, and 10% were Insufficiently Known (lowest). Of 146 species in the two highest categories, only nine were under sufficient management regimes, 23 might already have become extinct, 16 needed immediate intervention, and 42 needed very urgent attention. Parrots (28% of New World species threatened) and cracids (26%) suffered disproportionately through the combination of habitat loss and intensive human exploitation (trade and hunting respectively). A key means of saving threatened species lies in the identification and protection of areas in which they are sympatric. The New World, and in particular its Neotropical region, has long been recognized as holding a disproportionately large number of species. Of the world's roughly 9,500 bird species, we compute from a variety of sources that 4,130 (43%) occur in the New World (29% of the planet's land area), and 3,800 (40%) occur in the Neotropics (16% of the planet's land area). The New World's globally threatened bird species, defined according to standard criteria of IUCN (The World Conservation Union), have been listed in six ICBP/BirdLife studies (Anon. 1964; Vincent 1966-1971; King 1978-1979; Collar and Andrew 1988; Collar et al. 1992, 1994). Over the last 30 years the list has expanded five-fold, with most growth in continental South America. It had risen to 360 species by 1988, but with the most detailed and focused review of the situation (Collar et al. 1992), which included the Neotropical Pacific and the Caribbean, the number fell to 327, of which only four occurred entirely outside the Neotropical region. Bibby (1994) showed that the 1988 and 1992 reviews differed by 141 species. Some (24 species) of the discrepancy was because of taxonomic changes or the discovery of new species, but much of it was attributable to precautionary inclusions in the 1988 list (which was in any case preliminary in nature); of 29 species considered threatened for the first time in 1992, 14 had been indicated as \"near-threatened\" (i.e., subjectively judged as falling close to but outside the boundary for threatened status), and 15 were omitted altogether in the 1988 review. Eligibility for threatened status in both 1988 and 1992 was measured against presently outdated IUCN criteria, the vagueness and subjectivity of which had already led to a search for new criteria based on broadly applicable numerical thresholds (Mace and Lande 1991; Mace et al. 1993). Under the old criteria, a species was considered threatened if, by virtue of a declining world population or small range, it was somehow deemed to be at imminent or steadily increasing risk of global extinction. Under the new criteria issued in draft to the IUCN General Assembly in January 1994 and condensed in tabular form in the introduction to Collar et al. (1994) the same process of analysis was objectified and rendered more rigorous by the introduction of numerical thresholds for population sizes, range sizes, and decline rates. Nevertheless, use of the new criteria in 1994 largely confirmed the number and composition of the New World's threatened species in 1992. (Differences in composition from the 1994 list mostly involved transfer of species between the threatened and nearthreatened lists, not movement onto or off the non-threatened list.) In this paper we analyze the","PeriodicalId":54665,"journal":{"name":"Ornithological Monographs","volume":"1 1","pages":"237-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40157536","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns and Causes of Endangerment in the New World Avifauna\",\"authors\":\"N. Collar, D. Wege, A. Long\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/40157536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Threatened birds of the Americas (1992) detailed 327 species, of which only four had ranges entirely outside the Neotropics, showing how important this latter region is for global bird conservation, contributing 30% of all threatened birds on earth. Brazil had 97 threatened species, Peru 64, and Colombia 56. These countries, plus Mexico, held three-quarters of all threatened birds in the Americas. Over 78% (256) of all threatened bird species possessed ranges of less than 50,000 km2. Some 57% of all threatened birds were confined to wet forest, 17% to dry forest, and 10% to grasslands, a rapidly disappearing habitat type. Over 76% suffered from loss of habitat (for 49% this is the only threat); 16% and 11% suffered significantly from hunting and trade respectively, and 8% were threatened as a function of their restricted ranges. Roughly 30% (twice as many as in Africa) were Endangered (highest category), another 30% divided equally between Indeterminate and Vulnerable, 30% were Rare, and 10% were Insufficiently Known (lowest). Of 146 species in the two highest categories, only nine were under sufficient management regimes, 23 might already have become extinct, 16 needed immediate intervention, and 42 needed very urgent attention. Parrots (28% of New World species threatened) and cracids (26%) suffered disproportionately through the combination of habitat loss and intensive human exploitation (trade and hunting respectively). A key means of saving threatened species lies in the identification and protection of areas in which they are sympatric. The New World, and in particular its Neotropical region, has long been recognized as holding a disproportionately large number of species. Of the world's roughly 9,500 bird species, we compute from a variety of sources that 4,130 (43%) occur in the New World (29% of the planet's land area), and 3,800 (40%) occur in the Neotropics (16% of the planet's land area). The New World's globally threatened bird species, defined according to standard criteria of IUCN (The World Conservation Union), have been listed in six ICBP/BirdLife studies (Anon. 1964; Vincent 1966-1971; King 1978-1979; Collar and Andrew 1988; Collar et al. 1992, 1994). Over the last 30 years the list has expanded five-fold, with most growth in continental South America. It had risen to 360 species by 1988, but with the most detailed and focused review of the situation (Collar et al. 1992), which included the Neotropical Pacific and the Caribbean, the number fell to 327, of which only four occurred entirely outside the Neotropical region. Bibby (1994) showed that the 1988 and 1992 reviews differed by 141 species. Some (24 species) of the discrepancy was because of taxonomic changes or the discovery of new species, but much of it was attributable to precautionary inclusions in the 1988 list (which was in any case preliminary in nature); of 29 species considered threatened for the first time in 1992, 14 had been indicated as \\\"near-threatened\\\" (i.e., subjectively judged as falling close to but outside the boundary for threatened status), and 15 were omitted altogether in the 1988 review. Eligibility for threatened status in both 1988 and 1992 was measured against presently outdated IUCN criteria, the vagueness and subjectivity of which had already led to a search for new criteria based on broadly applicable numerical thresholds (Mace and Lande 1991; Mace et al. 1993). Under the old criteria, a species was considered threatened if, by virtue of a declining world population or small range, it was somehow deemed to be at imminent or steadily increasing risk of global extinction. Under the new criteria issued in draft to the IUCN General Assembly in January 1994 and condensed in tabular form in the introduction to Collar et al. (1994) the same process of analysis was objectified and rendered more rigorous by the introduction of numerical thresholds for population sizes, range sizes, and decline rates. Nevertheless, use of the new criteria in 1994 largely confirmed the number and composition of the New World's threatened species in 1992. (Differences in composition from the 1994 list mostly involved transfer of species between the threatened and nearthreatened lists, not movement onto or off the non-threatened list.) In this paper we analyze the\",\"PeriodicalId\":54665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ornithological Monographs\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"237-260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40157536\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ornithological Monographs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/40157536\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ornithological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/40157536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39
摘要
《美洲濒危鸟类》(1992)详细介绍了327种鸟类,其中只有4种的活动范围完全不在新热带地区,这表明了新热带地区对全球鸟类保护的重要性,占地球上所有濒危鸟类的30%。巴西有97种濒危物种,秘鲁64种,哥伦比亚56种。这些国家加上墨西哥,拥有美洲四分之三的濒危鸟类。超过78%(256种)的受威胁鸟类的活动范围小于5万平方公里。57%的受威胁鸟类生活在湿森林,17%生活在干森林,10%生活在草地,这是一种正在迅速消失的栖息地类型。超过76%的物种遭受栖息地丧失的威胁(49%的物种遭受栖息地丧失的威胁);16%和11%分别受到狩猎和贸易的严重影响,8%由于其活动范围的限制而受到威胁。大约30%(是非洲的两倍)是濒危物种(最高类别),另外30%是不确定和脆弱物种,30%是稀有物种,10%是不充分了解的物种(最低类别)。在两个最高分类的146个物种中,只有9个有足够的管理制度,23个可能已经灭绝,16个需要立即干预,42个需要非常紧急的关注。鹦鹉(占新世界受威胁物种的28%)和珊瑚(26%)因栖息地丧失和人类密集开发(分别为贸易和狩猎)而遭受了不成比例的损失。拯救濒危物种的一个关键方法是确定和保护它们的同域栖息地。新大陆,特别是其新热带地区,长期以来一直被认为拥有不成比例的大量物种。在世界上大约9500种鸟类中,我们从各种来源计算出,4130种(43%)生活在新世界(占地球陆地面积的29%),3800种(40%)生活在新热带(占地球陆地面积的16%)。根据IUCN(世界自然保护联盟)的标准标准定义的新世界全球受威胁鸟类物种,已被列入六项ICBP/BirdLife研究(Anon. 1964;文森特1966 - 1971;王1978 - 1979;Collar and Andrew 1988;Collar et al. 1992,1994)。在过去的30年里,这个名单扩大了5倍,其中南美洲大陆的增长最多。到1988年,它已经上升到360种,但经过最详细和最集中的审查(Collar et al. 1992),包括新热带太平洋和加勒比地区,数量下降到327种,其中只有4种完全发生在新热带地区之外。Bibby(1994)表明1988年和1992年的调查结果有141种差异。有些(24种)差异是由于分类学上的变化或新物种的发现,但大部分是由于预防性地列入1988年的名单(无论如何都是初步的);在1992年首次被认为受威胁的29种物种中,14种被指出为“近危”(即主观判断为接近但在受威胁状态的边界之外),在1988年的审查中完全省略了15种。1988年和1992年的受威胁地位资格是根据目前已经过时的自然保护联盟标准来衡量的,这些标准的模糊性和主观性已经导致人们根据广泛适用的数字阈值寻求新的标准(梅斯和兰德,1991年;Mace et al. 1993)。在旧的标准下,一个物种被认为是受威胁的,如果由于世界人口减少或范围小,某种程度上被认为是迫在眉睫或不断增加的全球灭绝的风险。根据1994年1月向世界自然保护联盟大会提交的草案中提出的新标准,并在Collar等人(1994)的引言中以表格形式进行了精简,通过引入种群规模、范围大小和下降率的数值阈值,同样的分析过程被客观化并变得更加严格。然而,1994年使用的新标准在很大程度上证实了1992年新世界受威胁物种的数量和组成。(与1994年的名单相比,构成上的差异主要涉及物种在受威胁和近受威胁名单之间的转移,而不是进入或退出非受威胁名单。)在本文中我们分析了
Patterns and Causes of Endangerment in the New World Avifauna
Threatened birds of the Americas (1992) detailed 327 species, of which only four had ranges entirely outside the Neotropics, showing how important this latter region is for global bird conservation, contributing 30% of all threatened birds on earth. Brazil had 97 threatened species, Peru 64, and Colombia 56. These countries, plus Mexico, held three-quarters of all threatened birds in the Americas. Over 78% (256) of all threatened bird species possessed ranges of less than 50,000 km2. Some 57% of all threatened birds were confined to wet forest, 17% to dry forest, and 10% to grasslands, a rapidly disappearing habitat type. Over 76% suffered from loss of habitat (for 49% this is the only threat); 16% and 11% suffered significantly from hunting and trade respectively, and 8% were threatened as a function of their restricted ranges. Roughly 30% (twice as many as in Africa) were Endangered (highest category), another 30% divided equally between Indeterminate and Vulnerable, 30% were Rare, and 10% were Insufficiently Known (lowest). Of 146 species in the two highest categories, only nine were under sufficient management regimes, 23 might already have become extinct, 16 needed immediate intervention, and 42 needed very urgent attention. Parrots (28% of New World species threatened) and cracids (26%) suffered disproportionately through the combination of habitat loss and intensive human exploitation (trade and hunting respectively). A key means of saving threatened species lies in the identification and protection of areas in which they are sympatric. The New World, and in particular its Neotropical region, has long been recognized as holding a disproportionately large number of species. Of the world's roughly 9,500 bird species, we compute from a variety of sources that 4,130 (43%) occur in the New World (29% of the planet's land area), and 3,800 (40%) occur in the Neotropics (16% of the planet's land area). The New World's globally threatened bird species, defined according to standard criteria of IUCN (The World Conservation Union), have been listed in six ICBP/BirdLife studies (Anon. 1964; Vincent 1966-1971; King 1978-1979; Collar and Andrew 1988; Collar et al. 1992, 1994). Over the last 30 years the list has expanded five-fold, with most growth in continental South America. It had risen to 360 species by 1988, but with the most detailed and focused review of the situation (Collar et al. 1992), which included the Neotropical Pacific and the Caribbean, the number fell to 327, of which only four occurred entirely outside the Neotropical region. Bibby (1994) showed that the 1988 and 1992 reviews differed by 141 species. Some (24 species) of the discrepancy was because of taxonomic changes or the discovery of new species, but much of it was attributable to precautionary inclusions in the 1988 list (which was in any case preliminary in nature); of 29 species considered threatened for the first time in 1992, 14 had been indicated as "near-threatened" (i.e., subjectively judged as falling close to but outside the boundary for threatened status), and 15 were omitted altogether in the 1988 review. Eligibility for threatened status in both 1988 and 1992 was measured against presently outdated IUCN criteria, the vagueness and subjectivity of which had already led to a search for new criteria based on broadly applicable numerical thresholds (Mace and Lande 1991; Mace et al. 1993). Under the old criteria, a species was considered threatened if, by virtue of a declining world population or small range, it was somehow deemed to be at imminent or steadily increasing risk of global extinction. Under the new criteria issued in draft to the IUCN General Assembly in January 1994 and condensed in tabular form in the introduction to Collar et al. (1994) the same process of analysis was objectified and rendered more rigorous by the introduction of numerical thresholds for population sizes, range sizes, and decline rates. Nevertheless, use of the new criteria in 1994 largely confirmed the number and composition of the New World's threatened species in 1992. (Differences in composition from the 1994 list mostly involved transfer of species between the threatened and nearthreatened lists, not movement onto or off the non-threatened list.) In this paper we analyze the