{"title":"ROSE问卷的效度和信度问题:西班牙生产的系统回顾","authors":"Radu Bogdan Toma","doi":"10.25267/REV_EUREKA_ENSEN_DIVULG_CIENC.2021.V18.I3.3102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Los cuestionarios ROSE ocupan un lugar destacado en la investigacion relacionada con las actitudes hacia la ciencia, sin embargo, su analisis psicometrico en poblacion de habla hispana ha sido descuidado. Esta revision sistematica recopila estudios que han empleado los instrumentos ROSE y presenta un analisis de sus evidencias psicometricas. Los hallazgos revelan lagunas en terminos de validez y fiabilidad. Concretamente, los resultados de validez estructural y fiabilidad documentados en la bibliografia son poco satisfactorios, insuficientes y contradictorios. Asimismo, existe una ausencia de aporte de evidencias fundamentales de validez (validez convergente, discriminante, concurrente y predictiva) y de fiabilidad test-retest (estabilidad temporal). Por lo tanto, la calidad psicometrica de los cuestionarios ROSE es preocupante y se desconoce en que medida evaluan adecuadamente las actitudes hacia la ciencia.\nPalabras clave: Actitudes hacia la ciencia; imagen de la ciencia; ciencia escolar; ciencia y tecnologia; educacion cientifica.\nValidity and reliability issues in the ROSE questionnaires: A systematic review of Spanish literature\nAbstract: The ROSE questionnaires stand out in research related to attitudes towards science; however, its psychometric analysis in the Spanish-speaking population has been neglected. This systematic review compiles research that used the ROSE instruments and provides an analysis of their psychometric evidence. The findings reveal gaps in terms of validity and reliability evidence. In particular, the results of structural validity and reliability documented in the literature are unsatisfactory, insufficient, and contradictory. Furthermore, fundamental psychometric properties are absent, such as convergent, discriminant, concurrent, and predictive validity; no evidence of temporal stability reliability was found neither. Therefore, the psychometric quality of the ROSE questionnaires is of concern and the extent to which they adequately measure attitudes towards science is unknown.\nKeywords: Attitudes toward science; image of Science; school science; science and technology; science education.","PeriodicalId":44952,"journal":{"name":"Revista Eureka sobre Ensenanza y Divulgacion de las Ciencias","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problemas de validez y fiabilidad en los cuestionarios ROSE: revisión sistemática de la producción española\",\"authors\":\"Radu Bogdan Toma\",\"doi\":\"10.25267/REV_EUREKA_ENSEN_DIVULG_CIENC.2021.V18.I3.3102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Los cuestionarios ROSE ocupan un lugar destacado en la investigacion relacionada con las actitudes hacia la ciencia, sin embargo, su analisis psicometrico en poblacion de habla hispana ha sido descuidado. Esta revision sistematica recopila estudios que han empleado los instrumentos ROSE y presenta un analisis de sus evidencias psicometricas. Los hallazgos revelan lagunas en terminos de validez y fiabilidad. Concretamente, los resultados de validez estructural y fiabilidad documentados en la bibliografia son poco satisfactorios, insuficientes y contradictorios. Asimismo, existe una ausencia de aporte de evidencias fundamentales de validez (validez convergente, discriminante, concurrente y predictiva) y de fiabilidad test-retest (estabilidad temporal). Por lo tanto, la calidad psicometrica de los cuestionarios ROSE es preocupante y se desconoce en que medida evaluan adecuadamente las actitudes hacia la ciencia.\\nPalabras clave: Actitudes hacia la ciencia; imagen de la ciencia; ciencia escolar; ciencia y tecnologia; educacion cientifica.\\nValidity and reliability issues in the ROSE questionnaires: A systematic review of Spanish literature\\nAbstract: The ROSE questionnaires stand out in research related to attitudes towards science; however, its psychometric analysis in the Spanish-speaking population has been neglected. This systematic review compiles research that used the ROSE instruments and provides an analysis of their psychometric evidence. The findings reveal gaps in terms of validity and reliability evidence. In particular, the results of structural validity and reliability documented in the literature are unsatisfactory, insufficient, and contradictory. Furthermore, fundamental psychometric properties are absent, such as convergent, discriminant, concurrent, and predictive validity; no evidence of temporal stability reliability was found neither. Therefore, the psychometric quality of the ROSE questionnaires is of concern and the extent to which they adequately measure attitudes towards science is unknown.\\nKeywords: Attitudes toward science; image of Science; school science; science and technology; science education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Eureka sobre Ensenanza y Divulgacion de las Ciencias\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Eureka sobre Ensenanza y Divulgacion de las Ciencias\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25267/REV_EUREKA_ENSEN_DIVULG_CIENC.2021.V18.I3.3102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Eureka sobre Ensenanza y Divulgacion de las Ciencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25267/REV_EUREKA_ENSEN_DIVULG_CIENC.2021.V18.I3.3102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
ROSE问卷在与科学态度相关的研究中占据着重要的地位,然而,它在西班牙语人群中的心理测量分析却被忽视了。本系统综述收集了使用ROSE工具的研究,并对其心理测量证据进行了分析。研究结果揭示了效度和信度方面的差距。具体来说,文献中记录的结构效度和信度结果不令人满意、不足和矛盾。此外,缺乏效度(收敛效度、判别效度、并发效度和预测效度)和检验-再检验信度(时间稳定性)的基本证据。因此,ROSE问卷的心理测量质量令人担忧,它们在多大程度上充分评估了人们对科学的态度尚不清楚。关键词:科学态度;科学的形象;学校科学;科学技术;cientifica教育。玫瑰问卷的有效性和可靠性问题:对西班牙文学摘要的系统回顾:玫瑰问卷在科学态度研究中的立场;然而,对西班牙语人群的心理测量分析却被忽视了。这systematic review您编译研究过去的the ROSE instruments and an analysis of及其psychometric提供证据。调查结果揭示了证据有效性和可靠性方面的差距。特别是,文献中记录的结构有效性和可靠性的结果是不令人满意的、不充分的和矛盾的。此外,缺乏基本的心理测量特性,如收敛性、判别性、并发性和预测有效性;= =地理= =根据美国人口普查局的数据,该镇总面积为,其中土地和(1.)水。因此,玫瑰问卷的心理测量质量令人担忧,它们充分衡量对科学态度的程度尚不清楚。关键词:对科学的态度;科学形象;学校科学;科学与技术;科学教育。
Problemas de validez y fiabilidad en los cuestionarios ROSE: revisión sistemática de la producción española
Los cuestionarios ROSE ocupan un lugar destacado en la investigacion relacionada con las actitudes hacia la ciencia, sin embargo, su analisis psicometrico en poblacion de habla hispana ha sido descuidado. Esta revision sistematica recopila estudios que han empleado los instrumentos ROSE y presenta un analisis de sus evidencias psicometricas. Los hallazgos revelan lagunas en terminos de validez y fiabilidad. Concretamente, los resultados de validez estructural y fiabilidad documentados en la bibliografia son poco satisfactorios, insuficientes y contradictorios. Asimismo, existe una ausencia de aporte de evidencias fundamentales de validez (validez convergente, discriminante, concurrente y predictiva) y de fiabilidad test-retest (estabilidad temporal). Por lo tanto, la calidad psicometrica de los cuestionarios ROSE es preocupante y se desconoce en que medida evaluan adecuadamente las actitudes hacia la ciencia.
Palabras clave: Actitudes hacia la ciencia; imagen de la ciencia; ciencia escolar; ciencia y tecnologia; educacion cientifica.
Validity and reliability issues in the ROSE questionnaires: A systematic review of Spanish literature
Abstract: The ROSE questionnaires stand out in research related to attitudes towards science; however, its psychometric analysis in the Spanish-speaking population has been neglected. This systematic review compiles research that used the ROSE instruments and provides an analysis of their psychometric evidence. The findings reveal gaps in terms of validity and reliability evidence. In particular, the results of structural validity and reliability documented in the literature are unsatisfactory, insufficient, and contradictory. Furthermore, fundamental psychometric properties are absent, such as convergent, discriminant, concurrent, and predictive validity; no evidence of temporal stability reliability was found neither. Therefore, the psychometric quality of the ROSE questionnaires is of concern and the extent to which they adequately measure attitudes towards science is unknown.
Keywords: Attitudes toward science; image of Science; school science; science and technology; science education.