{"title":"重新安排叙利亚银行首次指标的报告","authors":"Taufiqul Hulam, Muhammad Azani","doi":"10.30649/PHJ.V16I1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rescheduling Murabaha bill on Islamic banking is suspected to add the amount of remaining bill that is unclearly allocated and categorized as usury. The research is a socio-legal study by using primary, secondary and tertiary data sources. The data are collected through observation, interview and documentation. The results of the research show that firstly, rescheduling the murabaha bill in Bank Rakyat Indonesia Syariah (BRIS), Pekanbaru City branch is to make a new contract of the rescheduling, while the previous contract is declared null and void. Secondly, in fact, BRIS Pekanbaru City branch does not fully apply the provision that the amount of Murabaha bill can not be increased. In practice, BRIS only calculates the amount of months that become the customer’s responsibility by reducing the amount of installments, and does not calculate the amount of Murabaha remaining bill before rescheduling. Thirdly, if the party does not fulfill his/her obligations or if there is a dispute between the parties, the dispute will be settled through mutual consultation, the National Sharia Arbitration Board and the Religious Courts. The parties can primarily conduct deliberations to solve the problems.","PeriodicalId":31466,"journal":{"name":"Perspektif Hukum Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"60-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PENJADWALAN KEMBALI (RESCHEDULING) TAGIHAN MURABAHAH DI BANK RAKYAT INDONESIA SYARIAH (BRIS) KOTA PEKANBARU BERDASARKAN HUKUM ISLAM\",\"authors\":\"Taufiqul Hulam, Muhammad Azani\",\"doi\":\"10.30649/PHJ.V16I1.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rescheduling Murabaha bill on Islamic banking is suspected to add the amount of remaining bill that is unclearly allocated and categorized as usury. The research is a socio-legal study by using primary, secondary and tertiary data sources. The data are collected through observation, interview and documentation. The results of the research show that firstly, rescheduling the murabaha bill in Bank Rakyat Indonesia Syariah (BRIS), Pekanbaru City branch is to make a new contract of the rescheduling, while the previous contract is declared null and void. Secondly, in fact, BRIS Pekanbaru City branch does not fully apply the provision that the amount of Murabaha bill can not be increased. In practice, BRIS only calculates the amount of months that become the customer’s responsibility by reducing the amount of installments, and does not calculate the amount of Murabaha remaining bill before rescheduling. Thirdly, if the party does not fulfill his/her obligations or if there is a dispute between the parties, the dispute will be settled through mutual consultation, the National Sharia Arbitration Board and the Religious Courts. The parties can primarily conduct deliberations to solve the problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspektif Hukum Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"60-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspektif Hukum Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30649/PHJ.V16I1.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspektif Hukum Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30649/PHJ.V16I1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
伊斯兰银行重新安排Murabaha票据,可能会增加分配不明确的剩余票据金额,并将其归类为高利贷。该研究是一项社会法律研究,使用了初级、二级和三级数据来源。数据通过观察、访谈和文献收集。研究结果表明,首先,在印尼人民银行(Bank Rakyat Indonesia Syariah, BRIS)北干巴鲁市分行重新安排murabaha法案是重新安排的新合同,而先前的合同被宣布无效。其次,事实上,BRIS北干巴鲁市分公司并没有完全适用Murabaha账单金额不能增加的规定。在实际操作中,BRIS只会通过减少分期付款的金额来计算成为客户责任的月数,而不会在重新安排之前计算Murabaha剩余账单的金额。第三,如果一方不履行其义务或双方之间发生争议,将通过双方协商,通过国家伊斯兰教法仲裁委员会和宗教法院解决。当事人可以主要通过协商解决问题。
PENJADWALAN KEMBALI (RESCHEDULING) TAGIHAN MURABAHAH DI BANK RAKYAT INDONESIA SYARIAH (BRIS) KOTA PEKANBARU BERDASARKAN HUKUM ISLAM
Rescheduling Murabaha bill on Islamic banking is suspected to add the amount of remaining bill that is unclearly allocated and categorized as usury. The research is a socio-legal study by using primary, secondary and tertiary data sources. The data are collected through observation, interview and documentation. The results of the research show that firstly, rescheduling the murabaha bill in Bank Rakyat Indonesia Syariah (BRIS), Pekanbaru City branch is to make a new contract of the rescheduling, while the previous contract is declared null and void. Secondly, in fact, BRIS Pekanbaru City branch does not fully apply the provision that the amount of Murabaha bill can not be increased. In practice, BRIS only calculates the amount of months that become the customer’s responsibility by reducing the amount of installments, and does not calculate the amount of Murabaha remaining bill before rescheduling. Thirdly, if the party does not fulfill his/her obligations or if there is a dispute between the parties, the dispute will be settled through mutual consultation, the National Sharia Arbitration Board and the Religious Courts. The parties can primarily conduct deliberations to solve the problems.