为长期肌肉骨骼疼痛患者设计的体能测试仪器(TIPPA)的进一步方法学发展

Minaj Missaghi-Wedefalk, M. Lindh, Christina U M Schön-Ohlsson, C. Willén
{"title":"为长期肌肉骨骼疼痛患者设计的体能测试仪器(TIPPA)的进一步方法学发展","authors":"Minaj Missaghi-Wedefalk, M. Lindh, Christina U M Schön-Ohlsson, C. Willén","doi":"10.3109/14038196.2012.694907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In a heterogeneous group of patients with long-term musculoskeletal pain (LMP), there is a need for a short test to assess physical ability. The Test Instrument for Profile of Physical Ability (TIPPA) includes observed physical ability and pain behaviour as well as the individual's self-assessment of his or her ability and experience of exertion. The relation between these four dimensions of the individual is made visible in a profile. The aim of this study was to investigate the inter-rater reliability of pain behaviour, to reconstruct the limits for the grades in the nine physical activities and to investigate the test–retest reliability of these reconstructed grades. The results showed that the percentual agreement between the two physiotherapists who observed LMP patients (n = 7) was 100% for seven of the activities and 86% for the two remaining activities. The reconstruction of the grading system was based on the results of healthy persons (n = 48) and LMP patients (n = 658) performing the nine physical activities. For test–retest of the reconstructed grading system in a patient group (n = 13), no disagreement was found between occasions but a systematic disagreement was found in one activity. This study confirms that the TIPPA instrument is reliable and the grading system discriminates between healthy persons and LMP patients.","PeriodicalId":87870,"journal":{"name":"Advances in physiotherapy","volume":"14 1","pages":"106 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14038196.2012.694907","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Further methodological development of the Test Instrument for Profile of Physical Ability (TIPPA) designed for patients with long-term musculoskeletal pain\",\"authors\":\"Minaj Missaghi-Wedefalk, M. Lindh, Christina U M Schön-Ohlsson, C. Willén\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/14038196.2012.694907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In a heterogeneous group of patients with long-term musculoskeletal pain (LMP), there is a need for a short test to assess physical ability. The Test Instrument for Profile of Physical Ability (TIPPA) includes observed physical ability and pain behaviour as well as the individual's self-assessment of his or her ability and experience of exertion. The relation between these four dimensions of the individual is made visible in a profile. The aim of this study was to investigate the inter-rater reliability of pain behaviour, to reconstruct the limits for the grades in the nine physical activities and to investigate the test–retest reliability of these reconstructed grades. The results showed that the percentual agreement between the two physiotherapists who observed LMP patients (n = 7) was 100% for seven of the activities and 86% for the two remaining activities. The reconstruction of the grading system was based on the results of healthy persons (n = 48) and LMP patients (n = 658) performing the nine physical activities. For test–retest of the reconstructed grading system in a patient group (n = 13), no disagreement was found between occasions but a systematic disagreement was found in one activity. This study confirms that the TIPPA instrument is reliable and the grading system discriminates between healthy persons and LMP patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"106 - 97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14038196.2012.694907\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/14038196.2012.694907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/14038196.2012.694907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在长期肌肉骨骼疼痛(LMP)患者的异质组中,需要一个简短的测试来评估身体能力。体能测试仪器(TIPPA)包括观察到的体能和疼痛行为,以及个人对他或她的能力和运动经验的自我评估。个人的这四个方面之间的关系在侧面图中是可见的。本研究的目的是调查疼痛行为的评分者间信度,重建九种体育活动的评分限度,并调查这些重建的评分的重测信度。结果显示,观察LMP患者(n = 7)的两名物理治疗师对其中7项活动的百分比一致性为100%,其余两项活动的百分比一致性为86%。分级系统的重建是基于健康人(n = 48)和LMP患者(n = 658)进行9项体育活动的结果。对于一个患者组(n = 13)重建的分级系统的重新测试,在不同场合之间没有发现分歧,但在一个活动中发现了系统性的分歧。本研究证实了TIPPA仪器是可靠的,分级系统可以区分健康人和LMP患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Further methodological development of the Test Instrument for Profile of Physical Ability (TIPPA) designed for patients with long-term musculoskeletal pain
Abstract In a heterogeneous group of patients with long-term musculoskeletal pain (LMP), there is a need for a short test to assess physical ability. The Test Instrument for Profile of Physical Ability (TIPPA) includes observed physical ability and pain behaviour as well as the individual's self-assessment of his or her ability and experience of exertion. The relation between these four dimensions of the individual is made visible in a profile. The aim of this study was to investigate the inter-rater reliability of pain behaviour, to reconstruct the limits for the grades in the nine physical activities and to investigate the test–retest reliability of these reconstructed grades. The results showed that the percentual agreement between the two physiotherapists who observed LMP patients (n = 7) was 100% for seven of the activities and 86% for the two remaining activities. The reconstruction of the grading system was based on the results of healthy persons (n = 48) and LMP patients (n = 658) performing the nine physical activities. For test–retest of the reconstructed grading system in a patient group (n = 13), no disagreement was found between occasions but a systematic disagreement was found in one activity. This study confirms that the TIPPA instrument is reliable and the grading system discriminates between healthy persons and LMP patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信