循证物理治疗:知识、行为、态度和先决条件的调查

Y. Nilsagård, G. Lohse
{"title":"循证物理治疗:知识、行为、态度和先决条件的调查","authors":"Y. Nilsagård, G. Lohse","doi":"10.3109/14038196.2010.503812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose was to describe knowledge, attitude, behaviour, and prerequisites regarding evidence-based physiotherapy (EBPT) and to evaluate potential differences related to employment sectors and levels of education. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a web-based questionnaire to a random sample of 2,160 physiotherapists (PTs). Self-rated knowledge of evidence-based medicine (EBM) was rather high (median=69; IQ1;IQ3 50–77), although only 12–36% correctly identified all EBM components. Approximately 70% reported good ability to formulate clinical questions and critically appraise scientific literature. Only 28% performed database searches weekly or monthly. Eighty-six per cent reported using evidence-based guidelines in clinical practice. Lack of time (86%), advisors (80%), knowledge (55%) and superiors' lack of interest in EBM (46%) were common barriers. EBM was considered important (median=82, IQ1;IQ3 75–91) and believed to improve the quality of care (median=80, IQ1;IQ3 74–90). Employment sector differences were most obvious for behaviour and prerequisites with a disadvantage for municipality-employed PTs. The higher the level of education, the greater the knowledge, the more positive the attitudes, the better the prerequisites and the fewer the barriers reported. Higher levels of education positively affect EBPT. Behaviour and prerequisites differ depending on employment sector.","PeriodicalId":87870,"journal":{"name":"Advances in physiotherapy","volume":"12 1","pages":"179 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14038196.2010.503812","citationCount":"67","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence-based physiotherapy: A survey of knowledge, behaviour, attitudes and prerequisites\",\"authors\":\"Y. Nilsagård, G. Lohse\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/14038196.2010.503812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The purpose was to describe knowledge, attitude, behaviour, and prerequisites regarding evidence-based physiotherapy (EBPT) and to evaluate potential differences related to employment sectors and levels of education. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a web-based questionnaire to a random sample of 2,160 physiotherapists (PTs). Self-rated knowledge of evidence-based medicine (EBM) was rather high (median=69; IQ1;IQ3 50–77), although only 12–36% correctly identified all EBM components. Approximately 70% reported good ability to formulate clinical questions and critically appraise scientific literature. Only 28% performed database searches weekly or monthly. Eighty-six per cent reported using evidence-based guidelines in clinical practice. Lack of time (86%), advisors (80%), knowledge (55%) and superiors' lack of interest in EBM (46%) were common barriers. EBM was considered important (median=82, IQ1;IQ3 75–91) and believed to improve the quality of care (median=80, IQ1;IQ3 74–90). Employment sector differences were most obvious for behaviour and prerequisites with a disadvantage for municipality-employed PTs. The higher the level of education, the greater the knowledge, the more positive the attitudes, the better the prerequisites and the fewer the barriers reported. Higher levels of education positively affect EBPT. Behaviour and prerequisites differ depending on employment sector.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"179 - 186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14038196.2010.503812\",\"citationCount\":\"67\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/14038196.2010.503812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/14038196.2010.503812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

摘要

目的是描述循证物理治疗(EBPT)的知识、态度、行为和先决条件,并评估与就业部门和教育水平相关的潜在差异。横断面研究采用基于网络的问卷调查随机抽样2160名物理治疗师(PTs)。自评的循证医学知识(EBM)相当高(中位数=69;IQ1;IQ3 50-77),尽管只有12-36%正确识别了所有EBM成分。大约70%的人报告有良好的能力提出临床问题和批判性地评价科学文献。只有28%的人每周或每月进行数据库搜索。86%的人报告在临床实践中使用循证指南。缺乏时间(86%)、顾问(80%)、知识(55%)和上级对循证医学缺乏兴趣(46%)是常见的障碍。EBM被认为是重要的(中位数=82,IQ1;IQ3 75-91),并被认为可以提高护理质量(中位数=80,IQ1;IQ3 74-90)。就业部门的差异在行为和先决条件方面最为明显,市政雇用的pt处于不利地位。受教育程度越高,知识越多,态度越积极,先决条件越好,障碍越少。较高的教育水平对EBPT有积极影响。行为和先决条件因就业部门而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence-based physiotherapy: A survey of knowledge, behaviour, attitudes and prerequisites
Abstract The purpose was to describe knowledge, attitude, behaviour, and prerequisites regarding evidence-based physiotherapy (EBPT) and to evaluate potential differences related to employment sectors and levels of education. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a web-based questionnaire to a random sample of 2,160 physiotherapists (PTs). Self-rated knowledge of evidence-based medicine (EBM) was rather high (median=69; IQ1;IQ3 50–77), although only 12–36% correctly identified all EBM components. Approximately 70% reported good ability to formulate clinical questions and critically appraise scientific literature. Only 28% performed database searches weekly or monthly. Eighty-six per cent reported using evidence-based guidelines in clinical practice. Lack of time (86%), advisors (80%), knowledge (55%) and superiors' lack of interest in EBM (46%) were common barriers. EBM was considered important (median=82, IQ1;IQ3 75–91) and believed to improve the quality of care (median=80, IQ1;IQ3 74–90). Employment sector differences were most obvious for behaviour and prerequisites with a disadvantage for municipality-employed PTs. The higher the level of education, the greater the knowledge, the more positive the attitudes, the better the prerequisites and the fewer the barriers reported. Higher levels of education positively affect EBPT. Behaviour and prerequisites differ depending on employment sector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信