物理治疗师预测髋部骨折后的出院目的地

J. Sivertson, U. Öberg, N. Sernert
{"title":"物理治疗师预测髋部骨折后的出院目的地","authors":"J. Sivertson, U. Öberg, N. Sernert","doi":"10.3109/14038196.2010.486041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose was to investigate the predictive validity of discharge destination of two commonly used assessment tools and baseline variables in patients with femoral neck fracture. Thirty-two consecutive patients with a femoral neck fracture were assessed by an independent physiotherapist on days 3–5 post-surgery. Follow-up telephone interviews with structured questions were conducted at 3 weeks and 4 months post-surgery. The Swedish version of the Elderly Mobility Scale (Swe M-EMS) had an inverted correlation with discharge destination (rs=−0.423). Age (rs=0.389), living alone or with someone (rs=−0.593) and the physiotherapy evaluation (rs=0.516) also correlated with discharge destination. The Timed Up & Go (TUG) (rs=0.085) and pre-fracture activity level (rs=0.186) did not correlate with discharge destination. The Swe M-EMS may be considered a predictor of discharge destination in patients with a femoral neck fracture living in the community prior to fracture and with normal mental state, but not an independent predictor. We contend that the Swe M-EMS could be used in combination with predictive factors such as age, living alone or with someone and pre-fracture activity level.","PeriodicalId":87870,"journal":{"name":"Advances in physiotherapy","volume":"12 1","pages":"150 - 156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14038196.2010.486041","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physiotherapists predict discharge destination after hip fracture\",\"authors\":\"J. Sivertson, U. Öberg, N. Sernert\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/14038196.2010.486041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The purpose was to investigate the predictive validity of discharge destination of two commonly used assessment tools and baseline variables in patients with femoral neck fracture. Thirty-two consecutive patients with a femoral neck fracture were assessed by an independent physiotherapist on days 3–5 post-surgery. Follow-up telephone interviews with structured questions were conducted at 3 weeks and 4 months post-surgery. The Swedish version of the Elderly Mobility Scale (Swe M-EMS) had an inverted correlation with discharge destination (rs=−0.423). Age (rs=0.389), living alone or with someone (rs=−0.593) and the physiotherapy evaluation (rs=0.516) also correlated with discharge destination. The Timed Up & Go (TUG) (rs=0.085) and pre-fracture activity level (rs=0.186) did not correlate with discharge destination. The Swe M-EMS may be considered a predictor of discharge destination in patients with a femoral neck fracture living in the community prior to fracture and with normal mental state, but not an independent predictor. We contend that the Swe M-EMS could be used in combination with predictive factors such as age, living alone or with someone and pre-fracture activity level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"150 - 156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14038196.2010.486041\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/14038196.2010.486041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/14038196.2010.486041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要目的探讨两种常用评估工具及基线变量对股骨颈骨折患者出院目的地的预测有效性。32例连续股骨颈骨折患者在术后3-5天由独立物理治疗师进行评估。术后3周和4个月分别进行结构化问题的随访电话访谈。瑞典版老年人行动能力量表(Swe M-EMS)与出院目的地呈负相关(rs= - 0.423)。年龄(rs=0.389)、独居或与他人合住(rs=−0.593)和物理治疗评价(rs=0.516)也与出院目的地相关。time Up & Go (TUG) (rs=0.085)和压裂前活动水平(rs=0.186)与排放目的地无关。对于骨折前居住在社区且精神状态正常的股骨颈骨折患者,Swe M-EMS可被认为是出院目的地的预测因子,但不是独立的预测因子。我们认为,Swe M-EMS可以与年龄、独居或与他人一起生活以及骨折前的活动水平等预测因素结合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physiotherapists predict discharge destination after hip fracture
Abstract The purpose was to investigate the predictive validity of discharge destination of two commonly used assessment tools and baseline variables in patients with femoral neck fracture. Thirty-two consecutive patients with a femoral neck fracture were assessed by an independent physiotherapist on days 3–5 post-surgery. Follow-up telephone interviews with structured questions were conducted at 3 weeks and 4 months post-surgery. The Swedish version of the Elderly Mobility Scale (Swe M-EMS) had an inverted correlation with discharge destination (rs=−0.423). Age (rs=0.389), living alone or with someone (rs=−0.593) and the physiotherapy evaluation (rs=0.516) also correlated with discharge destination. The Timed Up & Go (TUG) (rs=0.085) and pre-fracture activity level (rs=0.186) did not correlate with discharge destination. The Swe M-EMS may be considered a predictor of discharge destination in patients with a femoral neck fracture living in the community prior to fracture and with normal mental state, but not an independent predictor. We contend that the Swe M-EMS could be used in combination with predictive factors such as age, living alone or with someone and pre-fracture activity level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信