{"title":"论语言学思维","authors":"V. Karasik","doi":"10.25205/2307-1737-2021-1-40-56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with a tentative grounding of philological thinking as a professional-ly determined type of cognitive activity. Two variants of a problem situation (factual and fictional) have been described. Professional philological argumentation is based on the dominant axioms for this type of professional activity.","PeriodicalId":36800,"journal":{"name":"Kritika i Semiotika","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Philological Thinking\",\"authors\":\"V. Karasik\",\"doi\":\"10.25205/2307-1737-2021-1-40-56\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper deals with a tentative grounding of philological thinking as a professional-ly determined type of cognitive activity. Two variants of a problem situation (factual and fictional) have been described. Professional philological argumentation is based on the dominant axioms for this type of professional activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kritika i Semiotika\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kritika i Semiotika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25205/2307-1737-2021-1-40-56\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kritika i Semiotika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25205/2307-1737-2021-1-40-56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
The paper deals with a tentative grounding of philological thinking as a professional-ly determined type of cognitive activity. Two variants of a problem situation (factual and fictional) have been described. Professional philological argumentation is based on the dominant axioms for this type of professional activity.