爱自己是阿奎那的自我赠予的条件

Q3 Arts and Humanities
A. Flood
{"title":"爱自己是阿奎那的自我赠予的条件","authors":"A. Flood","doi":"10.26385/SG.070320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perhaps the most well-known and provocative element of Wojtyla’s ethical anthropology is that the meaning and purpose of human life is rooted in a complete gift of self. Michael Waldstein has effectively argued that Wojtyla’s account is not novel; rather, Aquinas develops his account of love and friendship in a similar gift-of-self framework. I believe Waldstein is correct both in his argument and in showing the value of Aquinas’s account of love to debates in philosophical personalism. I wish to contribute to this debate by arguing that to understand adequately Aquinas’s account of love in general and the aspect of the gift of self in particular, we must appreciate the importance of his account of appropriate self-love; moreover, self-love and love as a gift of self constitute two foundational poles on which we should base any development of a theory of love within Thomistic personalism. I will proceed by offering brief overviews of Wojtyla’s concept of love as a gift of self and Waldstein’s comparative study of Wojtyla and Aquinas on this issue. I will then examine Aquinas’s notion of self-love, distin-","PeriodicalId":36983,"journal":{"name":"Studia Gilsoniana","volume":"19 1","pages":"419-435"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Love of Self as the Condition for a Gift of Self in Aquinas\",\"authors\":\"A. Flood\",\"doi\":\"10.26385/SG.070320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Perhaps the most well-known and provocative element of Wojtyla’s ethical anthropology is that the meaning and purpose of human life is rooted in a complete gift of self. Michael Waldstein has effectively argued that Wojtyla’s account is not novel; rather, Aquinas develops his account of love and friendship in a similar gift-of-self framework. I believe Waldstein is correct both in his argument and in showing the value of Aquinas’s account of love to debates in philosophical personalism. I wish to contribute to this debate by arguing that to understand adequately Aquinas’s account of love in general and the aspect of the gift of self in particular, we must appreciate the importance of his account of appropriate self-love; moreover, self-love and love as a gift of self constitute two foundational poles on which we should base any development of a theory of love within Thomistic personalism. I will proceed by offering brief overviews of Wojtyla’s concept of love as a gift of self and Waldstein’s comparative study of Wojtyla and Aquinas on this issue. I will then examine Aquinas’s notion of self-love, distin-\",\"PeriodicalId\":36983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Gilsoniana\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"419-435\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Gilsoniana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26385/SG.070320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Gilsoniana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26385/SG.070320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

也许在沃伊蒂拉的伦理人类学中,最著名和最具争议的元素是,人类生活的意义和目的根植于自我的完整礼物。迈克尔·沃尔德斯坦(Michael Waldstein)有力地辩称,沃伊蒂拉的叙述并不新颖;相反,阿奎那在一个类似的自我礼物框架中发展了他对爱情和友谊的描述。我相信Waldstein是正确的,无论是在他的论点上,还是在展示阿奎那对爱的描述对哲学人格主义辩论的价值上。我希望对这场辩论有所贡献,我认为要充分理解阿奎那对爱的总体描述,尤其是对自我礼物的描述,我们必须认识到他对适当的自爱的描述的重要性;此外,自爱和作为自我礼物的爱构成了两个基本极点,我们应该以此为基础,在托马斯主义人格主义中发展任何关于爱的理论。接下来,我将简要概述一下沃伊蒂拉关于爱是自我的礼物的概念,以及瓦尔德斯坦对沃伊蒂拉和阿奎那在这个问题上的比较研究。然后,我将考察阿奎那的自爱、区别的概念
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Love of Self as the Condition for a Gift of Self in Aquinas
Perhaps the most well-known and provocative element of Wojtyla’s ethical anthropology is that the meaning and purpose of human life is rooted in a complete gift of self. Michael Waldstein has effectively argued that Wojtyla’s account is not novel; rather, Aquinas develops his account of love and friendship in a similar gift-of-self framework. I believe Waldstein is correct both in his argument and in showing the value of Aquinas’s account of love to debates in philosophical personalism. I wish to contribute to this debate by arguing that to understand adequately Aquinas’s account of love in general and the aspect of the gift of self in particular, we must appreciate the importance of his account of appropriate self-love; moreover, self-love and love as a gift of self constitute two foundational poles on which we should base any development of a theory of love within Thomistic personalism. I will proceed by offering brief overviews of Wojtyla’s concept of love as a gift of self and Waldstein’s comparative study of Wojtyla and Aquinas on this issue. I will then examine Aquinas’s notion of self-love, distin-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Gilsoniana
Studia Gilsoniana Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信