学习计划?东南欧发展交通规划实践的知识框架和计划质量评估维度

M. Mladenović
{"title":"学习计划?东南欧发展交通规划实践的知识框架和计划质量评估维度","authors":"M. Mladenović","doi":"10.31075/pis.68.01.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Development of urban transport planning practices in South-East Europe (SEE) must still rise to the standards of EU Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan guidelines. However, institutions in these regions also lack capacity for development, despite the urgency for action. As theory of transport planning focuses mostly on institutional contexts outside of SEE, and practical guidelines often lack depth for providing plan assessment recommendations, there is a clear need to develop further connections between theory and practice. This research synthesizes key concepts from neo-institutional, policy transfer, and organizational learning theory, to outline a knowledge framework for urban transport planning as a process. Suggesting that planning should be understood as an organized process of creative experimentation and learning aiming for sustainable outcomes, two dimensions for plan quality assessment are introduced. The framework is exemplified using a combination of quantitative and qualitative aspects for long-term organizational learning including plan quality assessment as a major milestone in the planning process. Future research directions should emphasise further the processual nature of planning, including a higher emphasis on collaborative and action-research methods, which would closely engage both practice and academia.","PeriodicalId":32747,"journal":{"name":"Put i Saobracaj","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning to plan? Knowledge framework and plan quality assessment dimensions for developing transport planning practice in South-East Europe\",\"authors\":\"M. Mladenović\",\"doi\":\"10.31075/pis.68.01.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Development of urban transport planning practices in South-East Europe (SEE) must still rise to the standards of EU Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan guidelines. However, institutions in these regions also lack capacity for development, despite the urgency for action. As theory of transport planning focuses mostly on institutional contexts outside of SEE, and practical guidelines often lack depth for providing plan assessment recommendations, there is a clear need to develop further connections between theory and practice. This research synthesizes key concepts from neo-institutional, policy transfer, and organizational learning theory, to outline a knowledge framework for urban transport planning as a process. Suggesting that planning should be understood as an organized process of creative experimentation and learning aiming for sustainable outcomes, two dimensions for plan quality assessment are introduced. The framework is exemplified using a combination of quantitative and qualitative aspects for long-term organizational learning including plan quality assessment as a major milestone in the planning process. Future research directions should emphasise further the processual nature of planning, including a higher emphasis on collaborative and action-research methods, which would closely engage both practice and academia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Put i Saobracaj\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Put i Saobracaj\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31075/pis.68.01.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Put i Saobracaj","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31075/pis.68.01.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

东南欧(SEE)城市交通规划实践的发展仍然必须达到欧盟可持续城市交通计划指导方针的标准。然而,尽管迫切需要采取行动,这些地区的机构也缺乏发展能力。由于交通规划理论主要侧重于SEE之外的制度背景,而实践指南在提供规划评估建议方面往往缺乏深度,因此显然需要进一步发展理论与实践之间的联系。本研究综合了新制度理论、政策转移理论和组织学习理论的关键概念,概述了城市交通规划作为一个过程的知识框架。建议将规划理解为旨在实现可持续结果的创造性实验和学习的有组织的过程,介绍了规划质量评估的两个维度。该框架使用定量和定性方面的结合来举例说明长期组织学习,包括计划质量评估作为规划过程中的一个主要里程碑。今后的研究方向应进一步强调规划的过程性质,包括更加强调合作和行动研究方法,这将使实践和学术界密切合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning to plan? Knowledge framework and plan quality assessment dimensions for developing transport planning practice in South-East Europe
Development of urban transport planning practices in South-East Europe (SEE) must still rise to the standards of EU Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan guidelines. However, institutions in these regions also lack capacity for development, despite the urgency for action. As theory of transport planning focuses mostly on institutional contexts outside of SEE, and practical guidelines often lack depth for providing plan assessment recommendations, there is a clear need to develop further connections between theory and practice. This research synthesizes key concepts from neo-institutional, policy transfer, and organizational learning theory, to outline a knowledge framework for urban transport planning as a process. Suggesting that planning should be understood as an organized process of creative experimentation and learning aiming for sustainable outcomes, two dimensions for plan quality assessment are introduced. The framework is exemplified using a combination of quantitative and qualitative aspects for long-term organizational learning including plan quality assessment as a major milestone in the planning process. Future research directions should emphasise further the processual nature of planning, including a higher emphasis on collaborative and action-research methods, which would closely engage both practice and academia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信