使用基于信息熵的度量作为流持续时间的诊断来驱动模型参数识别

IF 1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
I. Pechlivanidis, B. Jackson, H. McMillan, H. Gupta
{"title":"使用基于信息熵的度量作为流持续时间的诊断来驱动模型参数识别","authors":"I. Pechlivanidis, B. Jackson, H. McMillan, H. Gupta","doi":"10.30955/gnj.000879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Calibration of rainfall-runoff models is made complicated by uncertainties in data, and by the arbitrary emphasis placed on various magnitudes of the model residuals by most traditional measures of fit. Current research highlights the importance of driving model identification by assimilating information from the data. In this paper, we evaluate the potential use of an entropybased measure as an objective function or as a model diagnostic in hydrological modelling, with particular interest in providing an appropriate quantitative measure of fit to the flow duration curve (FDC). The proposed Conditioned Entropy Difference (CED) metric is capable of characterising the information in the flow frequency distribution and thereby constrain the model calibration to respect this distributional information. Four years of hourly data from the 46.6 km 2 Mahurangi catchment, NZ, are used to calibrate the 6-parameter Probability Distributed Moisture model. Results are analysed using three measures: the proposed entropy-based measure, the Nash-Sutcliffe (NSE), and the recently proposed Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE). We also examine a conditioned entropy metric that trades-off and reweights different segments of the FDC to drive model calibration in a way that is based on modelling objectives. Overall, the entropy-based measure results in good performance in terms of NSE but poor performance in terms of KGE. This entropy measure is strongly sensitive to the shape of the flow distribution and is, from some viewpoints, the single best descriptor of the FDC. By conditioning entropy to respect multiple segments of the FDC, we can reweight entropy to respect those parts of the flow distribution of most interest to the modelling application. This approach constrains the behavioural parameter space so as to better identify parameters that represent both the “fast” and “slow” runoff processes. Use of this importance-weighted, conditioned entropy metric can constrain high flow predictions equally well as the NSE and KGE, while simultaneously providing wellconstrained low flow predictions that the NSE or KGE are unable to achieve.","PeriodicalId":55087,"journal":{"name":"Global Nest Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"325-334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using an informational entropy-based metric as a diagnostic of flow duration to drive model parameter identification\",\"authors\":\"I. Pechlivanidis, B. Jackson, H. McMillan, H. Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.30955/gnj.000879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Calibration of rainfall-runoff models is made complicated by uncertainties in data, and by the arbitrary emphasis placed on various magnitudes of the model residuals by most traditional measures of fit. Current research highlights the importance of driving model identification by assimilating information from the data. In this paper, we evaluate the potential use of an entropybased measure as an objective function or as a model diagnostic in hydrological modelling, with particular interest in providing an appropriate quantitative measure of fit to the flow duration curve (FDC). The proposed Conditioned Entropy Difference (CED) metric is capable of characterising the information in the flow frequency distribution and thereby constrain the model calibration to respect this distributional information. Four years of hourly data from the 46.6 km 2 Mahurangi catchment, NZ, are used to calibrate the 6-parameter Probability Distributed Moisture model. Results are analysed using three measures: the proposed entropy-based measure, the Nash-Sutcliffe (NSE), and the recently proposed Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE). We also examine a conditioned entropy metric that trades-off and reweights different segments of the FDC to drive model calibration in a way that is based on modelling objectives. Overall, the entropy-based measure results in good performance in terms of NSE but poor performance in terms of KGE. This entropy measure is strongly sensitive to the shape of the flow distribution and is, from some viewpoints, the single best descriptor of the FDC. By conditioning entropy to respect multiple segments of the FDC, we can reweight entropy to respect those parts of the flow distribution of most interest to the modelling application. This approach constrains the behavioural parameter space so as to better identify parameters that represent both the “fast” and “slow” runoff processes. Use of this importance-weighted, conditioned entropy metric can constrain high flow predictions equally well as the NSE and KGE, while simultaneously providing wellconstrained low flow predictions that the NSE or KGE are unable to achieve.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Nest Journal\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"325-334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Nest Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.000879\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Nest Journal","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.000879","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

由于数据的不确定性,以及大多数传统的拟合措施对模型残差的各种大小的任意强调,使得降雨径流模型的校准变得复杂。当前的研究强调了通过从数据中吸收信息来识别驱动模型的重要性。在本文中,我们评估了基于熵的测量作为目标函数或在水文建模中作为模型诊断的潜在用途,特别感兴趣的是提供适合流量持续时间曲线(FDC)的适当定量测量。所提出的条件熵差(CED)度量能够表征流频率分布中的信息,从而约束模型校准以尊重该分布信息。来自新西兰Mahurangi流域46.6 km 2的四年每小时数据被用来校准6参数概率分布湿度模型。结果分析使用三个措施:提出的基于熵的措施,纳什-苏特克利夫(NSE)和最近提出的克林-古普塔效率(KGE)。我们还研究了一个条件熵度量,该度量权衡和重新加权FDC的不同部分,以基于建模目标的方式驱动模型校准。总体而言,基于熵的度量在NSE方面表现良好,但在KGE方面表现不佳。该熵度量对流动分布的形状非常敏感,从某些角度来看,它是FDC的单一最佳描述符。通过调节熵以尊重FDC的多个部分,我们可以重新加权熵以尊重对建模应用程序最感兴趣的流分布的那些部分。这种方法限制了行为参数空间,以便更好地识别代表“快”和“慢”径流过程的参数。使用这种重要性加权的条件熵指标可以像NSE和KGE一样很好地约束大流量预测,同时提供NSE或KGE无法实现的约束良好的小流量预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using an informational entropy-based metric as a diagnostic of flow duration to drive model parameter identification
Calibration of rainfall-runoff models is made complicated by uncertainties in data, and by the arbitrary emphasis placed on various magnitudes of the model residuals by most traditional measures of fit. Current research highlights the importance of driving model identification by assimilating information from the data. In this paper, we evaluate the potential use of an entropybased measure as an objective function or as a model diagnostic in hydrological modelling, with particular interest in providing an appropriate quantitative measure of fit to the flow duration curve (FDC). The proposed Conditioned Entropy Difference (CED) metric is capable of characterising the information in the flow frequency distribution and thereby constrain the model calibration to respect this distributional information. Four years of hourly data from the 46.6 km 2 Mahurangi catchment, NZ, are used to calibrate the 6-parameter Probability Distributed Moisture model. Results are analysed using three measures: the proposed entropy-based measure, the Nash-Sutcliffe (NSE), and the recently proposed Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE). We also examine a conditioned entropy metric that trades-off and reweights different segments of the FDC to drive model calibration in a way that is based on modelling objectives. Overall, the entropy-based measure results in good performance in terms of NSE but poor performance in terms of KGE. This entropy measure is strongly sensitive to the shape of the flow distribution and is, from some viewpoints, the single best descriptor of the FDC. By conditioning entropy to respect multiple segments of the FDC, we can reweight entropy to respect those parts of the flow distribution of most interest to the modelling application. This approach constrains the behavioural parameter space so as to better identify parameters that represent both the “fast” and “slow” runoff processes. Use of this importance-weighted, conditioned entropy metric can constrain high flow predictions equally well as the NSE and KGE, while simultaneously providing wellconstrained low flow predictions that the NSE or KGE are unable to achieve.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Nest Journal
Global Nest Journal 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Network of Environmental Science and Technology Journal (Global NEST Journal) is a scientific source of information for professionals in a wide range of environmental disciplines. The Journal is published both in print and online. Global NEST Journal constitutes an international effort of scientists, technologists, engineers and other interested groups involved in all scientific and technological aspects of the environment, as well, as in application techniques aiming at the development of sustainable solutions. Its main target is to support and assist the dissemination of information regarding the most contemporary methods for improving quality of life through the development and application of technologies and policies friendly to the environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信