绑架在哲学对话中能做什么?

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
Anda Fournel
{"title":"绑架在哲学对话中能做什么?","authors":"Anda Fournel","doi":"10.24193/subbphil.2021.3.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What Abduction can do in Philosophical Dialogue? According to Peirce, abduction is a hypothetic-forming process that is necessary to explore unknown areas of knowledge, but also a real scientific method associated with the enquiry. If there is philosophical enquiry, could abduction serve as an appropriate method for such an approach? If so, how can it be used and with a view to what result(s)? We ask whether abduction can bring a potential both for discovery and a logical requirement to the philosophical questioning. In this paper we focus on a philosophy that \"is done\", in the form of a common enquiry, the \"community of philosophical inquiry\". The present research explores the advantages and limitations of requiring such a method, in the context of the practice under study. Keywords: abduction, method, philosophical inquiry, inference, unknown","PeriodicalId":40516,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Philosophia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Que peut faire l’abduction dans le dialogue philosophique?\",\"authors\":\"Anda Fournel\",\"doi\":\"10.24193/subbphil.2021.3.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What Abduction can do in Philosophical Dialogue? According to Peirce, abduction is a hypothetic-forming process that is necessary to explore unknown areas of knowledge, but also a real scientific method associated with the enquiry. If there is philosophical enquiry, could abduction serve as an appropriate method for such an approach? If so, how can it be used and with a view to what result(s)? We ask whether abduction can bring a potential both for discovery and a logical requirement to the philosophical questioning. In this paper we focus on a philosophy that \\\"is done\\\", in the form of a common enquiry, the \\\"community of philosophical inquiry\\\". The present research explores the advantages and limitations of requiring such a method, in the context of the practice under study. Keywords: abduction, method, philosophical inquiry, inference, unknown\",\"PeriodicalId\":40516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Philosophia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Philosophia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2021.3.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Philosophia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2021.3.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

溯因法在哲学对话中的作用?根据皮尔斯的观点,溯因是一种假设形成的过程,是探索未知知识领域所必需的,也是一种与探究相关的真正的科学方法。如果有哲学上的探究,绑架是否可以作为一种合适的方法?如果可以,如何使用它,并考虑到什么结果?我们要问溯因法是否能为哲学问题带来发现和逻辑要求的可能性。在本文中,我们关注一种“完成”的哲学,以一种共同探究的形式,即“哲学探究共同体”。本研究在研究的实践背景下,探讨了要求这种方法的优点和局限性。关键词:溯因法,方法,哲学探究,推理,未知
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Que peut faire l’abduction dans le dialogue philosophique?
What Abduction can do in Philosophical Dialogue? According to Peirce, abduction is a hypothetic-forming process that is necessary to explore unknown areas of knowledge, but also a real scientific method associated with the enquiry. If there is philosophical enquiry, could abduction serve as an appropriate method for such an approach? If so, how can it be used and with a view to what result(s)? We ask whether abduction can bring a potential both for discovery and a logical requirement to the philosophical questioning. In this paper we focus on a philosophy that "is done", in the form of a common enquiry, the "community of philosophical inquiry". The present research explores the advantages and limitations of requiring such a method, in the context of the practice under study. Keywords: abduction, method, philosophical inquiry, inference, unknown
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信