“人生经验的共鸣!”——理解实践知识——从海德格尔到伽达默尔再回到海德格尔

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
Alina Noveanu
{"title":"“人生经验的共鸣!”——理解实践知识——从海德格尔到伽达默尔再回到海德格尔","authors":"Alina Noveanu","doi":"10.24193/subbphil.2021.2s.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"For both Gadamer’s project of a philosophical hermeneutics as for Heidegger’s early understanding of facticity (Faktizität) as practical knowledge, the problem of application is central and is always linked to the specific conditions under which an individual decides to act within a community. Both also agree on the fact that the sciences of man do involve more than the epistemic subject, this is why the context i.e. the phenomenological concept of ‘world’ becomes part of the understanding process, one that cannot be ignored or transformed into an abstract matter. Understanding is therefore also in a specific way ‘historical’, as the application is dictated by momentary circumstances in life situations, which come before any use of theoretical knowledge and thus do not represent an appendix to theory. While Gadamer continuously insisted on the idea of a practical knowledge (Wissen) that surpasses the separations between theory and praxis, sophia and phronesis, Heidegger radicalized the idea of active thinking as an experience of language in connection to an essential ‘perception’ of Being itself, that goes beyond any subjectivity. The term by which he often characterizes this essential thinking (wesentliches Denken) is Vernehmen: a kind of receptive thinking. This conception of receptive thinking, as some conversations around the Zollikon Seminars and Le Thor/Zähringen will briefly show, lead Heidegger also to some interesting considerations on the human body. \n\nKeywords: practical knowledge, historicity, life, body, Vernehmen, phenomenological hermeneutics, world.\n\"","PeriodicalId":40516,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Philosophia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“The Sympathy of Experience With Life!” – Understanding Practical Knowledge From Heidegger to Gadamer and Back\",\"authors\":\"Alina Noveanu\",\"doi\":\"10.24193/subbphil.2021.2s.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"For both Gadamer’s project of a philosophical hermeneutics as for Heidegger’s early understanding of facticity (Faktizität) as practical knowledge, the problem of application is central and is always linked to the specific conditions under which an individual decides to act within a community. Both also agree on the fact that the sciences of man do involve more than the epistemic subject, this is why the context i.e. the phenomenological concept of ‘world’ becomes part of the understanding process, one that cannot be ignored or transformed into an abstract matter. Understanding is therefore also in a specific way ‘historical’, as the application is dictated by momentary circumstances in life situations, which come before any use of theoretical knowledge and thus do not represent an appendix to theory. While Gadamer continuously insisted on the idea of a practical knowledge (Wissen) that surpasses the separations between theory and praxis, sophia and phronesis, Heidegger radicalized the idea of active thinking as an experience of language in connection to an essential ‘perception’ of Being itself, that goes beyond any subjectivity. The term by which he often characterizes this essential thinking (wesentliches Denken) is Vernehmen: a kind of receptive thinking. This conception of receptive thinking, as some conversations around the Zollikon Seminars and Le Thor/Zähringen will briefly show, lead Heidegger also to some interesting considerations on the human body. \\n\\nKeywords: practical knowledge, historicity, life, body, Vernehmen, phenomenological hermeneutics, world.\\n\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":40516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Philosophia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Philosophia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2021.2s.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Philosophia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2021.2s.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于伽达默尔的哲学解释学计划和海德格尔对作为实践知识的事实性(Faktizität)的早期理解来说,应用问题是中心的,并且总是与个人决定在社区内行动的特定条件联系在一起。两人也都同意,人类科学确实涉及的不仅仅是认知主体,这就是为什么背景,即现象学的“世界”概念成为理解过程的一部分,一个不能被忽视或转化为抽象物质的人。因此,理解也以一种特定的方式是“历史的”,因为它的应用是由生活情境中的瞬间环境决定的,它出现在任何理论知识的使用之前,因此不代表理论的附录。伽达默尔不断坚持实践知识(Wissen)的观点,超越了理论与实践、索菲娅与现实之间的分离,海德格尔激进地将积极思维的观点作为一种与存在本身的本质“感知”联系在一起的语言经验,超越了任何主观性。他经常用Vernehmen这个词来描述这种本质思维(wesentliches Denken):一种接受性思维。这种接受性思维的概念,正如佐利康研讨会和Le Thor/Zähringen的一些对话将简要展示的那样,也将海德格尔引向一些关于人体的有趣思考。关键词:实践知识,历史性,生命,身体,凡内曼,现象学解释学,世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“The Sympathy of Experience With Life!” – Understanding Practical Knowledge From Heidegger to Gadamer and Back
"For both Gadamer’s project of a philosophical hermeneutics as for Heidegger’s early understanding of facticity (Faktizität) as practical knowledge, the problem of application is central and is always linked to the specific conditions under which an individual decides to act within a community. Both also agree on the fact that the sciences of man do involve more than the epistemic subject, this is why the context i.e. the phenomenological concept of ‘world’ becomes part of the understanding process, one that cannot be ignored or transformed into an abstract matter. Understanding is therefore also in a specific way ‘historical’, as the application is dictated by momentary circumstances in life situations, which come before any use of theoretical knowledge and thus do not represent an appendix to theory. While Gadamer continuously insisted on the idea of a practical knowledge (Wissen) that surpasses the separations between theory and praxis, sophia and phronesis, Heidegger radicalized the idea of active thinking as an experience of language in connection to an essential ‘perception’ of Being itself, that goes beyond any subjectivity. The term by which he often characterizes this essential thinking (wesentliches Denken) is Vernehmen: a kind of receptive thinking. This conception of receptive thinking, as some conversations around the Zollikon Seminars and Le Thor/Zähringen will briefly show, lead Heidegger also to some interesting considerations on the human body. Keywords: practical knowledge, historicity, life, body, Vernehmen, phenomenological hermeneutics, world. "
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信