当代爵士乐中过去的复兴:后现代的问题?

IF 0.1 1区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
Vincent Cotro
{"title":"当代爵士乐中过去的复兴:后现代的问题?","authors":"Vincent Cotro","doi":"10.2307/20141619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jazz, as developed through the last century, has kept a close relationship between creation and tradition. Constant reference to the roots of jazz has been made possible by both the oral transmission and deep and rapid evolution. However, there are numerous signs which show that since the 1980s the past of jazz is becoming more significant than its present. This phenomenon, parallel with certain recent developments of contemporary written music, will be examined here within the general scope of postmodernism. Initially we will have to clarify the meaning of modern and postmodern concepts as applied to music generally, and jazz historiography in particular. A tentative analogy might be made between postmodernism and jazz in their various shared conceptions - renunciation of a linear view of history, obsession with reference and eclectism, concern with communication between artists and audience. Nevertheless, we must also distinguish between different (sometimes opposite) ways of appealing to the past - reconstruction, revivalism, orthodoxy, adaptation, re-reading. Among these, a kind of \" moderate postmodernism \" appears through the recorded works of Dave Douglas or Franz Koglmann, and emerges from the particular level of historical consciousness which governs the elaboration of their appeals to the past. However, the postmodern analogy cannot be totally relevant if we consider only the resurgence and recycling of historical materials within contemporary jazz. A further stage of this research will consider such musicians as Uri Caine and Gian-Luigi Trovesi for the astonishing width of their scope of reference. Deliberately appropriating all kinds of historical musical materials with the help of collage and quotation, they playfully abolish any hierarchy of style or genre. In so doing, these musicians are approaching many postmodern problematics.","PeriodicalId":42522,"journal":{"name":"REVUE DE MUSICOLOGIE","volume":"91 1","pages":"425-454"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/20141619","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La résurgence du passé dans le jazz contemporain : une problématique post-moderne ?\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Cotro\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/20141619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Jazz, as developed through the last century, has kept a close relationship between creation and tradition. Constant reference to the roots of jazz has been made possible by both the oral transmission and deep and rapid evolution. However, there are numerous signs which show that since the 1980s the past of jazz is becoming more significant than its present. This phenomenon, parallel with certain recent developments of contemporary written music, will be examined here within the general scope of postmodernism. Initially we will have to clarify the meaning of modern and postmodern concepts as applied to music generally, and jazz historiography in particular. A tentative analogy might be made between postmodernism and jazz in their various shared conceptions - renunciation of a linear view of history, obsession with reference and eclectism, concern with communication between artists and audience. Nevertheless, we must also distinguish between different (sometimes opposite) ways of appealing to the past - reconstruction, revivalism, orthodoxy, adaptation, re-reading. Among these, a kind of \\\" moderate postmodernism \\\" appears through the recorded works of Dave Douglas or Franz Koglmann, and emerges from the particular level of historical consciousness which governs the elaboration of their appeals to the past. However, the postmodern analogy cannot be totally relevant if we consider only the resurgence and recycling of historical materials within contemporary jazz. A further stage of this research will consider such musicians as Uri Caine and Gian-Luigi Trovesi for the astonishing width of their scope of reference. Deliberately appropriating all kinds of historical musical materials with the help of collage and quotation, they playfully abolish any hierarchy of style or genre. In so doing, these musicians are approaching many postmodern problematics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVUE DE MUSICOLOGIE\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"425-454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/20141619\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVUE DE MUSICOLOGIE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/20141619\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVUE DE MUSICOLOGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/20141619","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

爵士乐在上个世纪发展起来,在创作和传统之间保持着密切的关系。通过口头传播和深入而迅速的演变,不断地参考爵士乐的根源成为可能。然而,有许多迹象表明,自20世纪80年代以来,爵士乐的过去正变得比现在更重要。这种现象,与当代书面音乐的某些最新发展平行,将在后现代主义的一般范围内进行研究。首先,我们必须澄清现代和后现代概念的含义,一般应用于音乐,特别是爵士乐史学。我们可以在后现代主义和爵士乐之间做一个暂定的类比,因为它们有着不同的共同概念——放弃线性历史观,痴迷于参考和折衷主义,关注艺术家和观众之间的交流。然而,我们也必须区分不同的(有时是相反的)诉诸过去的方式——重建、复兴、正统、改编、重新阅读。其中,一种“温和的后现代主义”通过戴夫·道格拉斯(Dave Douglas)或弗朗茨·科尔曼(Franz Koglmann)的记录作品出现,并从特定的历史意识水平中浮现出来,这种意识水平支配着他们对过去的诉求的阐述。然而,如果我们只考虑当代爵士乐中历史材料的复兴和回收,后现代的类比就不能完全相关。这项研究的进一步阶段将考虑像乌里·凯恩和吉安-路易吉·特罗维西这样的音乐家,因为他们的参考范围非常广泛。他们以拼贴和引用的方式,故意挪用各种历史音乐材料,玩世不换地废除了任何风格或流派的等级制度。在这样做的过程中,这些音乐家正在接近许多后现代问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La résurgence du passé dans le jazz contemporain : une problématique post-moderne ?
Jazz, as developed through the last century, has kept a close relationship between creation and tradition. Constant reference to the roots of jazz has been made possible by both the oral transmission and deep and rapid evolution. However, there are numerous signs which show that since the 1980s the past of jazz is becoming more significant than its present. This phenomenon, parallel with certain recent developments of contemporary written music, will be examined here within the general scope of postmodernism. Initially we will have to clarify the meaning of modern and postmodern concepts as applied to music generally, and jazz historiography in particular. A tentative analogy might be made between postmodernism and jazz in their various shared conceptions - renunciation of a linear view of history, obsession with reference and eclectism, concern with communication between artists and audience. Nevertheless, we must also distinguish between different (sometimes opposite) ways of appealing to the past - reconstruction, revivalism, orthodoxy, adaptation, re-reading. Among these, a kind of " moderate postmodernism " appears through the recorded works of Dave Douglas or Franz Koglmann, and emerges from the particular level of historical consciousness which governs the elaboration of their appeals to the past. However, the postmodern analogy cannot be totally relevant if we consider only the resurgence and recycling of historical materials within contemporary jazz. A further stage of this research will consider such musicians as Uri Caine and Gian-Luigi Trovesi for the astonishing width of their scope of reference. Deliberately appropriating all kinds of historical musical materials with the help of collage and quotation, they playfully abolish any hierarchy of style or genre. In so doing, these musicians are approaching many postmodern problematics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信