多准则决策任务中聚合次序的优化方法

Josef Jablonský
{"title":"多准则决策任务中聚合次序的优化方法","authors":"Josef Jablonský","doi":"10.24132/JBT.2020.10.3.57_63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many different methods for analysis of multiple criteria decision-making problems. Considering the problems for evaluation of alternatives, a typical situation is that the application of various methods leads to different results, i.e. each method generates different ranking of alternatives. A similar situation occurs in case a certain number of individual decision-makers participates in the analysis of a problem. The paper contains a proposal of optimization procedures that aggregates several individual rankings into one final ranking. As a result, the decision-maker obtains an aggregated ranking that is based either on the minimization of the weighted sum of deviations of individual rankings from the final ranking or on the minimization of the maximum deviation over all individual rankings. The applicability of the procedures is illustrated on a simple numerical example.","PeriodicalId":30792,"journal":{"name":"Trendy v podnikani","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimalizační procedura pro agregaci pořadí v úlohách vícekriteriálního rozhodování\",\"authors\":\"Josef Jablonský\",\"doi\":\"10.24132/JBT.2020.10.3.57_63\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are many different methods for analysis of multiple criteria decision-making problems. Considering the problems for evaluation of alternatives, a typical situation is that the application of various methods leads to different results, i.e. each method generates different ranking of alternatives. A similar situation occurs in case a certain number of individual decision-makers participates in the analysis of a problem. The paper contains a proposal of optimization procedures that aggregates several individual rankings into one final ranking. As a result, the decision-maker obtains an aggregated ranking that is based either on the minimization of the weighted sum of deviations of individual rankings from the final ranking or on the minimization of the maximum deviation over all individual rankings. The applicability of the procedures is illustrated on a simple numerical example.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trendy v podnikani\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trendy v podnikani\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24132/JBT.2020.10.3.57_63\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trendy v podnikani","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24132/JBT.2020.10.3.57_63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多准则决策问题的分析方法多种多样。考虑到备选方案的评价问题,典型的情况是各种方法的应用导致不同的结果,即每种方法产生不同的备选方案排名。如果有一定数量的个人决策者参与问题的分析,也会出现类似的情况。本文包含了一个优化程序的建议,将几个单独的排名汇总为一个最终排名。因此,决策者获得一个汇总排名,该排名要么基于个体排名与最终排名的加权偏差之和的最小化,要么基于所有个体排名的最大偏差的最小化。通过一个简单的算例说明了该方法的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimalizační procedura pro agregaci pořadí v úlohách vícekriteriálního rozhodování
There are many different methods for analysis of multiple criteria decision-making problems. Considering the problems for evaluation of alternatives, a typical situation is that the application of various methods leads to different results, i.e. each method generates different ranking of alternatives. A similar situation occurs in case a certain number of individual decision-makers participates in the analysis of a problem. The paper contains a proposal of optimization procedures that aggregates several individual rankings into one final ranking. As a result, the decision-maker obtains an aggregated ranking that is based either on the minimization of the weighted sum of deviations of individual rankings from the final ranking or on the minimization of the maximum deviation over all individual rankings. The applicability of the procedures is illustrated on a simple numerical example.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信