{"title":"解开皈依:印尼森林部落的宗教变迁与身份认同","authors":"C. Duncan","doi":"10.2307/3773831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the late 1980s, after decades of refusal, the Forest Tobelo foragers of northeastern Halmahera, Indonesia, converted to Christianity. The version of Christianity they accepted was not the one offered (or imposed) by coastal Tobelo- speaking communities with whom they share kinship and affinal ties, but was brought to the region by the American-based New Tribes Mission. This essay examines the factors and motivations behind this change, and offers an explanation that takes into account local histories, larger political and economic changes, such as deforestation and land encroachment, and the rarely examined topic of missionary methodologies. The Forest Tobelo decision to convert is best understood as an attempt to maintain their distinct identity from coastal communities with whom they have a long history of poor relations; the methods used by the New Tribes Mission made conversion an attractive option at that time. (Christianity, missionaries, Halmahera, conversion motivations) In March 1999, a Forest Tobelo man began preaching the Bible to the largest remaining group of unconverted Forest Tobelo living in the interior of central Halmahera. As the island erupted into communal violence later that year, he continued to teach despite requests from coastal communities that he stop. By October of that year a large number of the Forest Tobelo he was working with accepted the Christianity he was professing. At the same time, other Forest Tobelo missionaries were preaching to groups living in three other river valleys and were planning to go elsewhere on the island to proselytize. The seeds of this indigenous missionary movement were planted in 1982, when the New Tribes Mission arrived at Tanjung Lili in northeastern Halmahera and began laying the groundwork for their evangelism. This evangelistic activity eventually led the majority of the Forest Tobelo from the Lili, Waisango, and Afu Rivers to convert to Christianity in the late 1980s. Some of these converts now work as missionaries throughout central Halmahera. This article examines how and why a large number of Forest Tobelo decided to adopt Christianity after decades of refusal, and why they chose the New Tribes Mission version as opposed to that offered (or imposed) by the coastal Tobelo, with whom they share a language, kinship, and affinal ties. The explanation requires connecting the larger processes of social change that affected the Forest Tobelo with the moral and epistemological choices made at the individual level in decisions to accept or reject Christianity. Some models of conversion attribute such change to modernization or state incorporation, while others turn to Weberian notions of disenchantment and rationalization; i.e., an estrangement with an old way of life and the incorporation into a new social order led to the adoption of Christianity (Weber 1956; Horton 1975). However, as critics have noted, such explanations fail to take into account politics, economics, or hierarchies of power (Van der Veer 1996:10). In response, anthropologists and historians have switched their focus to the political economy of conversion and the power relationships involved, which are seen as an integral part of modernity. By adopting Christianity (or another world religion), people are in effect converting to modernity; e.g., joining the market economy, becoming citizens of a nation, etc. (Van der Veer 1996). At the same time, these theoretical approaches often view modernity as a force that overwhelms small-scale societies. They assume that these communities are victimized and have no agency in making the decision to convert (Meyer 1996:226 n. 35). However, conversion is not a simple choice between domination or appropriation, but rather a dialectic between the two (Comaroff and Comaroff 1991; Comaroff and Comaroff 1997:49). When the missionaries arrived in central Halmahera with their agendas for evangelism, the Forest Tobelo had their own agendas, which at times conflicted and at others times coincided with those of the New Tribes Mission. …","PeriodicalId":81209,"journal":{"name":"Ethnology","volume":"18 1","pages":"307-322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3773831","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Untangling conversion: Religious change and identity among the forest tobelo of Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"C. Duncan\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/3773831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the late 1980s, after decades of refusal, the Forest Tobelo foragers of northeastern Halmahera, Indonesia, converted to Christianity. The version of Christianity they accepted was not the one offered (or imposed) by coastal Tobelo- speaking communities with whom they share kinship and affinal ties, but was brought to the region by the American-based New Tribes Mission. This essay examines the factors and motivations behind this change, and offers an explanation that takes into account local histories, larger political and economic changes, such as deforestation and land encroachment, and the rarely examined topic of missionary methodologies. The Forest Tobelo decision to convert is best understood as an attempt to maintain their distinct identity from coastal communities with whom they have a long history of poor relations; the methods used by the New Tribes Mission made conversion an attractive option at that time. (Christianity, missionaries, Halmahera, conversion motivations) In March 1999, a Forest Tobelo man began preaching the Bible to the largest remaining group of unconverted Forest Tobelo living in the interior of central Halmahera. As the island erupted into communal violence later that year, he continued to teach despite requests from coastal communities that he stop. By October of that year a large number of the Forest Tobelo he was working with accepted the Christianity he was professing. At the same time, other Forest Tobelo missionaries were preaching to groups living in three other river valleys and were planning to go elsewhere on the island to proselytize. The seeds of this indigenous missionary movement were planted in 1982, when the New Tribes Mission arrived at Tanjung Lili in northeastern Halmahera and began laying the groundwork for their evangelism. This evangelistic activity eventually led the majority of the Forest Tobelo from the Lili, Waisango, and Afu Rivers to convert to Christianity in the late 1980s. Some of these converts now work as missionaries throughout central Halmahera. This article examines how and why a large number of Forest Tobelo decided to adopt Christianity after decades of refusal, and why they chose the New Tribes Mission version as opposed to that offered (or imposed) by the coastal Tobelo, with whom they share a language, kinship, and affinal ties. The explanation requires connecting the larger processes of social change that affected the Forest Tobelo with the moral and epistemological choices made at the individual level in decisions to accept or reject Christianity. Some models of conversion attribute such change to modernization or state incorporation, while others turn to Weberian notions of disenchantment and rationalization; i.e., an estrangement with an old way of life and the incorporation into a new social order led to the adoption of Christianity (Weber 1956; Horton 1975). However, as critics have noted, such explanations fail to take into account politics, economics, or hierarchies of power (Van der Veer 1996:10). In response, anthropologists and historians have switched their focus to the political economy of conversion and the power relationships involved, which are seen as an integral part of modernity. By adopting Christianity (or another world religion), people are in effect converting to modernity; e.g., joining the market economy, becoming citizens of a nation, etc. (Van der Veer 1996). At the same time, these theoretical approaches often view modernity as a force that overwhelms small-scale societies. They assume that these communities are victimized and have no agency in making the decision to convert (Meyer 1996:226 n. 35). However, conversion is not a simple choice between domination or appropriation, but rather a dialectic between the two (Comaroff and Comaroff 1991; Comaroff and Comaroff 1997:49). When the missionaries arrived in central Halmahera with their agendas for evangelism, the Forest Tobelo had their own agendas, which at times conflicted and at others times coincided with those of the New Tribes Mission. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":81209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"307-322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3773831\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/3773831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3773831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
摘要
在20世纪80年代末,经过几十年的拒绝,印度尼西亚哈马黑拉东北部的森林托贝洛采集者皈依了基督教。他们接受的基督教版本并不是沿海托贝洛语社区提供(或强加)的,而是由美国的新部落传教团带到该地区的,他们与托贝洛语社区有血缘关系和最后的联系。本文考察了这种变化背后的因素和动机,并提供了一种解释,考虑到当地历史,更大的政治和经济变化,如森林砍伐和土地侵占,以及很少研究的传教士方法主题。森林托贝洛人皈依的决定最好被理解为一种尝试,以保持他们与沿海社区的独特身份,他们与沿海社区有着长期的不良关系;新部落传教团使用的方法使皈依成为当时一个有吸引力的选择。(基督教,传教士,哈马黑拉,改信动机)1999年3月,一位森林托贝罗人开始向居住在哈马黑拉中部内陆的最大的未改信森林托贝罗人群体传讲圣经。那年晚些时候,该岛爆发了社区暴力事件,尽管沿海社区要求他停止教学,但他仍继续任教。到那年10月,与他一起工作的许多森林托贝洛人接受了他所信仰的基督教。与此同时,其他森林托贝罗传教士正在向生活在其他三个河谷的群体传教,并计划去岛上的其他地方传教。这个土著宣教运动的种子是在1982年种下的,当时新部落宣教团抵达哈马黑拉东北部的丹戎里利,开始为他们的传福音奠定基础。这种传福音的活动最终在20世纪80年代后期使大多数来自Lili, Waisango和Afu河的Forest Tobelo人皈依基督教。其中一些皈依者现在在哈马黑拉中部担任传教士。这篇文章探讨了大量的森林托贝洛人如何以及为什么在拒绝了几十年之后决定接受基督教,以及为什么他们选择了新部落使命的版本,而不是沿海托贝洛人提供(或强加)的版本,他们与沿海托贝洛人共享语言,亲属关系和最终联系。这种解释需要将影响托贝洛森林的更大的社会变革过程与个人在决定接受或拒绝基督教时做出的道德和认识论选择联系起来。一些转换模型将这种变化归因于现代化或国家合并,而其他模型则转向韦伯的祛魅和合理化概念;也就是说,与旧的生活方式的隔阂和融入新的社会秩序导致了基督教的采用(韦伯1956;霍顿1975)。然而,正如批评者指出的那样,这些解释没有考虑到政治、经济或权力等级(Van der Veer 1996:10)。作为回应,人类学家和历史学家将他们的关注点转向了转换的政治经济学及其涉及的权力关系,这被视为现代性的一个组成部分。通过接受基督教(或另一种世界宗教),人们实际上是在向现代性转变;例如,加入市场经济,成为一个国家的公民等(Van der Veer 1996)。与此同时,这些理论方法往往将现代性视为一种压倒小规模社会的力量。他们认为这些社区是受害者,在决定皈依方面没有代理(Meyer 1996:226 n. 35)。然而,转换并不是支配或占有之间的简单选择,而是两者之间的辩证关系(Comaroff and Comaroff 1991;Comaroff and Comaroff 1997:49)。当传教士带着他们的传福音日程到达哈马赫拉中部时,森林托贝洛人也有他们自己的日程,这些日程有时与新部落使命相冲突,有时又与新部落使命相吻合。…
Untangling conversion: Religious change and identity among the forest tobelo of Indonesia
In the late 1980s, after decades of refusal, the Forest Tobelo foragers of northeastern Halmahera, Indonesia, converted to Christianity. The version of Christianity they accepted was not the one offered (or imposed) by coastal Tobelo- speaking communities with whom they share kinship and affinal ties, but was brought to the region by the American-based New Tribes Mission. This essay examines the factors and motivations behind this change, and offers an explanation that takes into account local histories, larger political and economic changes, such as deforestation and land encroachment, and the rarely examined topic of missionary methodologies. The Forest Tobelo decision to convert is best understood as an attempt to maintain their distinct identity from coastal communities with whom they have a long history of poor relations; the methods used by the New Tribes Mission made conversion an attractive option at that time. (Christianity, missionaries, Halmahera, conversion motivations) In March 1999, a Forest Tobelo man began preaching the Bible to the largest remaining group of unconverted Forest Tobelo living in the interior of central Halmahera. As the island erupted into communal violence later that year, he continued to teach despite requests from coastal communities that he stop. By October of that year a large number of the Forest Tobelo he was working with accepted the Christianity he was professing. At the same time, other Forest Tobelo missionaries were preaching to groups living in three other river valleys and were planning to go elsewhere on the island to proselytize. The seeds of this indigenous missionary movement were planted in 1982, when the New Tribes Mission arrived at Tanjung Lili in northeastern Halmahera and began laying the groundwork for their evangelism. This evangelistic activity eventually led the majority of the Forest Tobelo from the Lili, Waisango, and Afu Rivers to convert to Christianity in the late 1980s. Some of these converts now work as missionaries throughout central Halmahera. This article examines how and why a large number of Forest Tobelo decided to adopt Christianity after decades of refusal, and why they chose the New Tribes Mission version as opposed to that offered (or imposed) by the coastal Tobelo, with whom they share a language, kinship, and affinal ties. The explanation requires connecting the larger processes of social change that affected the Forest Tobelo with the moral and epistemological choices made at the individual level in decisions to accept or reject Christianity. Some models of conversion attribute such change to modernization or state incorporation, while others turn to Weberian notions of disenchantment and rationalization; i.e., an estrangement with an old way of life and the incorporation into a new social order led to the adoption of Christianity (Weber 1956; Horton 1975). However, as critics have noted, such explanations fail to take into account politics, economics, or hierarchies of power (Van der Veer 1996:10). In response, anthropologists and historians have switched their focus to the political economy of conversion and the power relationships involved, which are seen as an integral part of modernity. By adopting Christianity (or another world religion), people are in effect converting to modernity; e.g., joining the market economy, becoming citizens of a nation, etc. (Van der Veer 1996). At the same time, these theoretical approaches often view modernity as a force that overwhelms small-scale societies. They assume that these communities are victimized and have no agency in making the decision to convert (Meyer 1996:226 n. 35). However, conversion is not a simple choice between domination or appropriation, but rather a dialectic between the two (Comaroff and Comaroff 1991; Comaroff and Comaroff 1997:49). When the missionaries arrived in central Halmahera with their agendas for evangelism, the Forest Tobelo had their own agendas, which at times conflicted and at others times coincided with those of the New Tribes Mission. …