{"title":"致:慢性乙型肝炎感染患者停止核苷类似物治疗后的安全性——作者的答复","authors":"Yao-Chun Hsu, Mindie H. Nguyen, Chun-Ying Wu","doi":"10.1111/apt.17681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We thank Liu <i>et al</i> for their interest in our study. We agree that pre-treatment HBeAg status could influence the risk of severe hepatitis flares after withdrawal of nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUCs). However, the limited number of events restricted our ability to explore risk predictors in the eligible sub-cohort, defined by available data to document negative HBeAg and undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA with a period of treatment consolidation prior to treatment cessation. Nonetheless, our data highlight the insufficiency of current stopping rules in safeguarding patients from severe withdrawal flares, irrespective of their pre-treatment HBeAg status. As Liu <i>et al</i> reported, both HBeAg-positive and -negative patients meeting the Asian-Pacific criteria for NUC discontinuation could suffer from liver failure and even death due to severe withdrawal flares.</p><p>We also agree that tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), when compared to entecavir (ETV), was associated with a higher risk of clinical relapse following treatment cessation.<span><sup>1</sup></span> However, we did not find an association between the antiviral regimen and hepatic decompensation from withdrawal flares in our study.<span><sup>2</sup></span> If Liu et al. had reviewed our article more thoroughly, they certainly would have noticed in the appendix that this factor was included in our multivariable model.</p><p>Our findings align with existing literature. For instance, analyses of the international RETRACT-B consortium showed that, while TDF was linked to an earlier occurrence of virological relapse and a higher rate of clinical relapse,<span><sup>3</sup></span> it did not differ from ETV in the incidence of hepatic decompensation.<span><sup>4</sup></span> This was corroborated by a recent hospital-based study, in which TDF conferred a higher rate of relapse and an earlier occurrence in HBeAg-positive patients but all of five patients who developed hepatic decompensation were withdrawing from ETV instead of TDF (5/96 vs. 0/70; <i>p</i> = 0.074).<span><sup>5</sup></span> In our view, the discrepancy could be attributed to the timing of re-treatment as an earlier relapse may lead to an earlier resumption of antiviral treatment.<span><sup>6</sup></span></p><p>Contrary to the suggestion by Liu <i>et al</i>, our approach, based on the national healthcare database in Taiwan, is less susceptible to attrition bias. Given the universal coverage of Taiwan's national health insurance,<span><sup>7</sup></span> our outcome measurements did not rely on follow-up at a specific hospital. Moreover, we reported the duration of treatment consolidation in the eligible sub-cohort (section 3.4). Our analysis on post-treatment monitoring, with details available in the appendix, indicated that most serious outcomes did not result from poor adherence to medical attention.</p><p>We respectfully disagree with the assertion that our data inflated the risk of off-NUC hepatic decompensation. This study was meticulously designed to quantify the risk of severe withdrawal flares in a population where NUC cessation was routinely practised. In fact, the risks estimated in the current study were similar to those reported in large hospital-based cohort studies or meta-analysis of existing literature.<span><sup>4, 8</sup></span> Based on our findings together with available evidence,<span><sup>9</sup></span> we caution against considering NUC cessation as a routine practice for patients with chronic hepatitis B.</p><p><b>Yao-Chun Hsu:</b> Conceptualization (lead); investigation (lead); writing – original draft (lead). <b>Mindie H. Nguyen:</b> Conceptualization (supporting); methodology (supporting); writing – review and editing (supporting). <b>Chun-Ying Wu:</b> Methodology (supporting); supervision (lead); writing – review and editing (lead).</p><p>Yao-Chun Hsu: Research support from Gilead Sciences. Advisory committee member for Gilead Sciences. Speaker bureau for Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Novartis. Mindie H. Nguyen: Research support from Pfizer, Gilead Sciences, Vir Biotech, Glycotests, Exact Science, Helio Health, B. K. Kee Foundation and the National Cancer Institute. Advisory board member or consultant for Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Novartis, Eisai, Bayer, Exact Science, Laboratory of Advanced Medicine, Spring Bank, GSK and Janssen. Chun-Ying Wu: nothing to declare.</p><p>This article is linked to Hsu et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17614 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17657</p>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"58 7","pages":"733-734"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.17681","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Letter: Safety after cessation of nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection—Authors' reply\",\"authors\":\"Yao-Chun Hsu, Mindie H. Nguyen, Chun-Ying Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apt.17681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We thank Liu <i>et al</i> for their interest in our study. We agree that pre-treatment HBeAg status could influence the risk of severe hepatitis flares after withdrawal of nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUCs). However, the limited number of events restricted our ability to explore risk predictors in the eligible sub-cohort, defined by available data to document negative HBeAg and undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA with a period of treatment consolidation prior to treatment cessation. Nonetheless, our data highlight the insufficiency of current stopping rules in safeguarding patients from severe withdrawal flares, irrespective of their pre-treatment HBeAg status. As Liu <i>et al</i> reported, both HBeAg-positive and -negative patients meeting the Asian-Pacific criteria for NUC discontinuation could suffer from liver failure and even death due to severe withdrawal flares.</p><p>We also agree that tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), when compared to entecavir (ETV), was associated with a higher risk of clinical relapse following treatment cessation.<span><sup>1</sup></span> However, we did not find an association between the antiviral regimen and hepatic decompensation from withdrawal flares in our study.<span><sup>2</sup></span> If Liu et al. had reviewed our article more thoroughly, they certainly would have noticed in the appendix that this factor was included in our multivariable model.</p><p>Our findings align with existing literature. For instance, analyses of the international RETRACT-B consortium showed that, while TDF was linked to an earlier occurrence of virological relapse and a higher rate of clinical relapse,<span><sup>3</sup></span> it did not differ from ETV in the incidence of hepatic decompensation.<span><sup>4</sup></span> This was corroborated by a recent hospital-based study, in which TDF conferred a higher rate of relapse and an earlier occurrence in HBeAg-positive patients but all of five patients who developed hepatic decompensation were withdrawing from ETV instead of TDF (5/96 vs. 0/70; <i>p</i> = 0.074).<span><sup>5</sup></span> In our view, the discrepancy could be attributed to the timing of re-treatment as an earlier relapse may lead to an earlier resumption of antiviral treatment.<span><sup>6</sup></span></p><p>Contrary to the suggestion by Liu <i>et al</i>, our approach, based on the national healthcare database in Taiwan, is less susceptible to attrition bias. Given the universal coverage of Taiwan's national health insurance,<span><sup>7</sup></span> our outcome measurements did not rely on follow-up at a specific hospital. Moreover, we reported the duration of treatment consolidation in the eligible sub-cohort (section 3.4). Our analysis on post-treatment monitoring, with details available in the appendix, indicated that most serious outcomes did not result from poor adherence to medical attention.</p><p>We respectfully disagree with the assertion that our data inflated the risk of off-NUC hepatic decompensation. This study was meticulously designed to quantify the risk of severe withdrawal flares in a population where NUC cessation was routinely practised. In fact, the risks estimated in the current study were similar to those reported in large hospital-based cohort studies or meta-analysis of existing literature.<span><sup>4, 8</sup></span> Based on our findings together with available evidence,<span><sup>9</sup></span> we caution against considering NUC cessation as a routine practice for patients with chronic hepatitis B.</p><p><b>Yao-Chun Hsu:</b> Conceptualization (lead); investigation (lead); writing – original draft (lead). <b>Mindie H. Nguyen:</b> Conceptualization (supporting); methodology (supporting); writing – review and editing (supporting). <b>Chun-Ying Wu:</b> Methodology (supporting); supervision (lead); writing – review and editing (lead).</p><p>Yao-Chun Hsu: Research support from Gilead Sciences. Advisory committee member for Gilead Sciences. Speaker bureau for Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Novartis. Mindie H. Nguyen: Research support from Pfizer, Gilead Sciences, Vir Biotech, Glycotests, Exact Science, Helio Health, B. K. Kee Foundation and the National Cancer Institute. Advisory board member or consultant for Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Novartis, Eisai, Bayer, Exact Science, Laboratory of Advanced Medicine, Spring Bank, GSK and Janssen. Chun-Ying Wu: nothing to declare.</p><p>This article is linked to Hsu et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17614 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17657</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"58 7\",\"pages\":\"733-734\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.17681\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.17681\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.17681","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们感谢Liu等人对我们的研究感兴趣。我们同意治疗前HBeAg状态可能影响停药后核苷类似物(NUCs)严重肝炎发作的风险。然而,事件数量有限限制了我们在符合条件的亚队列中探索风险预测因子的能力,这些亚队列由现有数据定义,记录HBeAg阴性和未检测到的乙型肝炎病毒DNA,在治疗结束前的一段治疗巩固期。尽管如此,我们的数据强调了当前停止规则在保护患者免受严重戒断发作方面的不足,无论其治疗前的HBeAg状态如何。正如Liu等人报道的那样,符合亚太地区停用NUC标准的hbeag阳性和阴性患者都可能因严重的停药发作而出现肝功能衰竭甚至死亡。我们也同意,与恩替卡韦(ETV)相比,富马酸替诺福韦(TDF)与停药后更高的临床复发风险相关然而,在我们的研究中,我们没有发现抗病毒方案与戒断发作引起的肝代偿失代偿之间的联系如果Liu等人更彻底地审查我们的文章,他们肯定会在附录中注意到这个因素被包含在我们的多变量模型中。我们的发现与现有文献一致。例如,国际缩回- b联盟的分析表明,虽然TDF与更早发生的病毒学复发和更高的临床复发率有关,但在肝失代偿的发生率方面与ETV没有区别最近一项基于医院的研究证实了这一点,在该研究中,TDF在hbeag阳性患者中具有更高的复发率和更早的发生率,但所有5名发生肝代偿失代偿的患者都退出了ETV,而不是TDF(5/96比0/70;p = 0.074)我们认为,这种差异可能归因于重新治疗的时间,因为较早的复发可能导致较早恢复抗病毒治疗。与Liu等人的建议相反,我们的方法基于台湾的国家医疗保健数据库,不太容易受到损耗偏差的影响。鉴于台湾全民健康保险的覆盖范围,7我们的结果测量不依赖于特定医院的随访。此外,我们报告了符合条件的亚队列中治疗巩固的持续时间(第3.4节)。我们对治疗后监测的分析(详见附录)表明,最严重的结果并非由于不遵守医疗护理。我们不同意我们的数据夸大了非nuc肝代偿风险的说法。本研究经过精心设计,以量化在NUC常规停止的人群中严重戒断发作的风险。事实上,当前研究中估计的风险与大型医院队列研究或现有文献荟萃分析报告的风险相似。4,8根据我们的研究结果和现有证据,9我们警告不要将NUC停止作为慢性乙型肝炎患者的常规做法。调查(领导);写作——原稿(引子)。Mindie H. Nguyen:概念化(支持);方法(支持);写作-审查和编辑(辅助)。吴春英:方法论(辅助);监督(领导);写作-审查和编辑(主导)。徐耀春:吉利德科学公司的研究支持。吉利德科学咨询委员会成员。Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp &Dohme和诺华。Mindie H. Nguyen:辉瑞、Gilead Sciences、Vir Biotech、Glycotests、Exact Science、Helio Health、b.k. Kee Foundation和国家癌症研究所的研究支持。Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Novartis, Eisai, Bayer, Exact Science, Laboratory of Advanced Medicine, Spring Bank, GSK和Janssen的顾问委员会成员或顾问。吴春英:没什么要申报的。本文链接到Hsu等人的论文。要查看这些文章,请访问https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17614和https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17657
Letter: Safety after cessation of nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection—Authors' reply
We thank Liu et al for their interest in our study. We agree that pre-treatment HBeAg status could influence the risk of severe hepatitis flares after withdrawal of nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUCs). However, the limited number of events restricted our ability to explore risk predictors in the eligible sub-cohort, defined by available data to document negative HBeAg and undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA with a period of treatment consolidation prior to treatment cessation. Nonetheless, our data highlight the insufficiency of current stopping rules in safeguarding patients from severe withdrawal flares, irrespective of their pre-treatment HBeAg status. As Liu et al reported, both HBeAg-positive and -negative patients meeting the Asian-Pacific criteria for NUC discontinuation could suffer from liver failure and even death due to severe withdrawal flares.
We also agree that tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), when compared to entecavir (ETV), was associated with a higher risk of clinical relapse following treatment cessation.1 However, we did not find an association between the antiviral regimen and hepatic decompensation from withdrawal flares in our study.2 If Liu et al. had reviewed our article more thoroughly, they certainly would have noticed in the appendix that this factor was included in our multivariable model.
Our findings align with existing literature. For instance, analyses of the international RETRACT-B consortium showed that, while TDF was linked to an earlier occurrence of virological relapse and a higher rate of clinical relapse,3 it did not differ from ETV in the incidence of hepatic decompensation.4 This was corroborated by a recent hospital-based study, in which TDF conferred a higher rate of relapse and an earlier occurrence in HBeAg-positive patients but all of five patients who developed hepatic decompensation were withdrawing from ETV instead of TDF (5/96 vs. 0/70; p = 0.074).5 In our view, the discrepancy could be attributed to the timing of re-treatment as an earlier relapse may lead to an earlier resumption of antiviral treatment.6
Contrary to the suggestion by Liu et al, our approach, based on the national healthcare database in Taiwan, is less susceptible to attrition bias. Given the universal coverage of Taiwan's national health insurance,7 our outcome measurements did not rely on follow-up at a specific hospital. Moreover, we reported the duration of treatment consolidation in the eligible sub-cohort (section 3.4). Our analysis on post-treatment monitoring, with details available in the appendix, indicated that most serious outcomes did not result from poor adherence to medical attention.
We respectfully disagree with the assertion that our data inflated the risk of off-NUC hepatic decompensation. This study was meticulously designed to quantify the risk of severe withdrawal flares in a population where NUC cessation was routinely practised. In fact, the risks estimated in the current study were similar to those reported in large hospital-based cohort studies or meta-analysis of existing literature.4, 8 Based on our findings together with available evidence,9 we caution against considering NUC cessation as a routine practice for patients with chronic hepatitis B.
Yao-Chun Hsu: Conceptualization (lead); investigation (lead); writing – original draft (lead). Mindie H. Nguyen: Conceptualization (supporting); methodology (supporting); writing – review and editing (supporting). Chun-Ying Wu: Methodology (supporting); supervision (lead); writing – review and editing (lead).
Yao-Chun Hsu: Research support from Gilead Sciences. Advisory committee member for Gilead Sciences. Speaker bureau for Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Novartis. Mindie H. Nguyen: Research support from Pfizer, Gilead Sciences, Vir Biotech, Glycotests, Exact Science, Helio Health, B. K. Kee Foundation and the National Cancer Institute. Advisory board member or consultant for Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Novartis, Eisai, Bayer, Exact Science, Laboratory of Advanced Medicine, Spring Bank, GSK and Janssen. Chun-Ying Wu: nothing to declare.
This article is linked to Hsu et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17614 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17657
期刊介绍:
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.