无政府主义还是无政府主义?异质革命部署的历史,1930-1938

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Susanna Tavera
{"title":"无政府主义还是无政府主义?异质革命部署的历史,1930-1938","authors":"Susanna Tavera","doi":"10.2436/CHR.V0I5.64989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research embarks upon a study of anarchism during the Second Republic and the Spanish Civil War, while it also falls within the framework of the latest and most important historiographic contributions to this subject. It examines the distinction between anarchist militancy and membership in the Single Unions of the National Confederation of Labour (CNT); the decisive and highly significant ties between the members and the local and regional spheres, especially in the Catalan-speaking countries and even Spain-wide; the role played by the press in the movement, which set great store by their ideological aversion to politics and simultaneously the meaning that the so-called libertarian “groupism” had to the FAI members, as well as to the members and anarcho-syndicalist leaders of the Single Unions. Finally, the study upholds that the anarcho-syndicalist leaders and/or anarchists belonged to “affinity groups” that were defined according to the jobs they assigned themselves, but with the assumption that they could join or belong to more than one group according to militant “friendships” and specialisations, which could be strictly union-related and could also include anarchist or open cultural “action” – the latter including theatre, newspapers and infra-litterature. However, it should be noted that the heterogeneity of the forms of membership did not imply the existence of numerous “anarchisms”, since unity was ensured through varied forms of solidarity and coordination, and even through the so-called “honour trials”.","PeriodicalId":38516,"journal":{"name":"Catalan Historical Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"101-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anarchism or anarchisms? The history of a heterogeneous revolutionary deployment, 1930-1938\",\"authors\":\"Susanna Tavera\",\"doi\":\"10.2436/CHR.V0I5.64989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research embarks upon a study of anarchism during the Second Republic and the Spanish Civil War, while it also falls within the framework of the latest and most important historiographic contributions to this subject. It examines the distinction between anarchist militancy and membership in the Single Unions of the National Confederation of Labour (CNT); the decisive and highly significant ties between the members and the local and regional spheres, especially in the Catalan-speaking countries and even Spain-wide; the role played by the press in the movement, which set great store by their ideological aversion to politics and simultaneously the meaning that the so-called libertarian “groupism” had to the FAI members, as well as to the members and anarcho-syndicalist leaders of the Single Unions. Finally, the study upholds that the anarcho-syndicalist leaders and/or anarchists belonged to “affinity groups” that were defined according to the jobs they assigned themselves, but with the assumption that they could join or belong to more than one group according to militant “friendships” and specialisations, which could be strictly union-related and could also include anarchist or open cultural “action” – the latter including theatre, newspapers and infra-litterature. However, it should be noted that the heterogeneity of the forms of membership did not imply the existence of numerous “anarchisms”, since unity was ensured through varied forms of solidarity and coordination, and even through the so-called “honour trials”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catalan Historical Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"101-116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catalan Historical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2436/CHR.V0I5.64989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalan Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2436/CHR.V0I5.64989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究开始于第二共和国和西班牙内战期间的无政府主义研究,同时它也属于这一主题的最新和最重要的史学贡献的框架。它考察了无政府主义战斗性和全国劳工联合会(CNT)单一工会成员之间的区别;成员国与地方和区域领域之间的决定性和高度重要的联系,特别是在加泰罗尼亚语国家甚至整个西班牙;媒体在运动中扮演的角色,他们非常重视对政治的意识形态厌恶,同时,所谓的自由意志主义“群体主义”对FAI成员的意义,以及对单一工会的成员和无政府工团主义领导人的意义。最后,该研究坚持认为,无政府工团主义领导人和/或无政府主义者属于根据他们分配给自己的工作定义的“亲和团体”,但假设他们可以根据激进的“友谊”和专业加入或属于多个团体,这些团体可以严格地与工会相关,也可以包括无政府主义或开放的文化“行动”-后者包括剧院,报纸和基础文学。但是,应当指出,成员形式的多样性并不意味着存在许多“无政府主义”,因为通过各种形式的团结和协调,甚至通过所谓的“荣誉审判”,统一得到了保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anarchism or anarchisms? The history of a heterogeneous revolutionary deployment, 1930-1938
This research embarks upon a study of anarchism during the Second Republic and the Spanish Civil War, while it also falls within the framework of the latest and most important historiographic contributions to this subject. It examines the distinction between anarchist militancy and membership in the Single Unions of the National Confederation of Labour (CNT); the decisive and highly significant ties between the members and the local and regional spheres, especially in the Catalan-speaking countries and even Spain-wide; the role played by the press in the movement, which set great store by their ideological aversion to politics and simultaneously the meaning that the so-called libertarian “groupism” had to the FAI members, as well as to the members and anarcho-syndicalist leaders of the Single Unions. Finally, the study upholds that the anarcho-syndicalist leaders and/or anarchists belonged to “affinity groups” that were defined according to the jobs they assigned themselves, but with the assumption that they could join or belong to more than one group according to militant “friendships” and specialisations, which could be strictly union-related and could also include anarchist or open cultural “action” – the latter including theatre, newspapers and infra-litterature. However, it should be noted that the heterogeneity of the forms of membership did not imply the existence of numerous “anarchisms”, since unity was ensured through varied forms of solidarity and coordination, and even through the so-called “honour trials”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Catalan Historical Review
Catalan Historical Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信