{"title":"《行政法律在我国的应用》,第37期(2004)。","authors":"M. Debofsky","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.436480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Employee benefit claims brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) have been mistakenly adjudicated under an administrative law model rather than as any other civil action brought before the federal court. This article discusses the impropriety of the use of an administrative law paradigm in litigation of ERISA benefit disputes and suggests a more appropriate way of resolving claim disputes.","PeriodicalId":83085,"journal":{"name":"The John Marshall law review","volume":"37 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Paradox of the Misuse of Administrative Law In ERISA Benefit Claims, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 727 (2004)\",\"authors\":\"M. Debofsky\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.436480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Employee benefit claims brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) have been mistakenly adjudicated under an administrative law model rather than as any other civil action brought before the federal court. This article discusses the impropriety of the use of an administrative law paradigm in litigation of ERISA benefit disputes and suggests a more appropriate way of resolving claim disputes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The John Marshall law review\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The John Marshall law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.436480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The John Marshall law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.436480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Paradox of the Misuse of Administrative Law In ERISA Benefit Claims, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 727 (2004)
Employee benefit claims brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) have been mistakenly adjudicated under an administrative law model rather than as any other civil action brought before the federal court. This article discusses the impropriety of the use of an administrative law paradigm in litigation of ERISA benefit disputes and suggests a more appropriate way of resolving claim disputes.