《行政法律在我国的应用》,第37期(2004)。

M. Debofsky
{"title":"《行政法律在我国的应用》,第37期(2004)。","authors":"M. Debofsky","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.436480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Employee benefit claims brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) have been mistakenly adjudicated under an administrative law model rather than as any other civil action brought before the federal court. This article discusses the impropriety of the use of an administrative law paradigm in litigation of ERISA benefit disputes and suggests a more appropriate way of resolving claim disputes.","PeriodicalId":83085,"journal":{"name":"The John Marshall law review","volume":"37 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Paradox of the Misuse of Administrative Law In ERISA Benefit Claims, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 727 (2004)\",\"authors\":\"M. Debofsky\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.436480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Employee benefit claims brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) have been mistakenly adjudicated under an administrative law model rather than as any other civil action brought before the federal court. This article discusses the impropriety of the use of an administrative law paradigm in litigation of ERISA benefit disputes and suggests a more appropriate way of resolving claim disputes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The John Marshall law review\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The John Marshall law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.436480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The John Marshall law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.436480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

根据《雇员退休收入保障法》(ERISA)提出的雇员福利索赔被错误地按照行政法模式裁决,而不是按照联邦法院提出的任何其他民事诉讼进行裁决。本文讨论了在ERISA利益纠纷诉讼中运用行政法范式的不恰当之处,并提出了一种更合适的解决索赔纠纷的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Paradox of the Misuse of Administrative Law In ERISA Benefit Claims, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 727 (2004)
Employee benefit claims brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) have been mistakenly adjudicated under an administrative law model rather than as any other civil action brought before the federal court. This article discusses the impropriety of the use of an administrative law paradigm in litigation of ERISA benefit disputes and suggests a more appropriate way of resolving claim disputes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信