活动指标汇总度量在手部活动识别中的可行性检验

Q3 Engineering
Jelena Medarevic, Marija M. Novičić, Marko Marković
{"title":"活动指标汇总度量在手部活动识别中的可行性检验","authors":"Jelena Medarevic, Marija M. Novičić, Marko Marković","doi":"10.2298/sjee2202225m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Activity monitoring is a technique for assessing the physical activity that a person undertakes over some time. Activity Index (AI) is a metric that summarizes the raw measurements from tri-axial accelerometers, often used for measuring physical activity. Our research compared the Activity Index for different activity groups and hand usage [1]. We also tested this metric as a classification feature, and how different data acquisition and segmentation parameter configurations influence classification accuracy. Data acquisition was done with a previously developed system that includes a smartwatch on each wrist and a smartphone placed in the subject?s pocket; raw data from smartwatch accelerometers was used for the analysis. We calculated the Activity Index for labeled data segments and used ANOVA1 statistical test with Bonferroni correction. Significant differences were found between cases of hand usage (left, right, none, both). In the next analysis phase, the Activity Index was used as the classification feature with three supervised machine learning algorithms-Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbors, and Random Forest. The best accuracy (measured by F1 score) of classifying hand usage was achieved by using the Random Forest algorithm, 50 Hz sampling frequency, and a window of 10 s without overlap for AI calculation, and it was 97%. On the other hand, the classification of activity groups had a low accuracy, which indicated that a specific activity group can?t be identified by using only one simple feature.","PeriodicalId":37704,"journal":{"name":"Serbian Journal of Electrical Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility test of activity index summary metric in human hand activity recognition\",\"authors\":\"Jelena Medarevic, Marija M. Novičić, Marko Marković\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/sjee2202225m\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Activity monitoring is a technique for assessing the physical activity that a person undertakes over some time. Activity Index (AI) is a metric that summarizes the raw measurements from tri-axial accelerometers, often used for measuring physical activity. Our research compared the Activity Index for different activity groups and hand usage [1]. We also tested this metric as a classification feature, and how different data acquisition and segmentation parameter configurations influence classification accuracy. Data acquisition was done with a previously developed system that includes a smartwatch on each wrist and a smartphone placed in the subject?s pocket; raw data from smartwatch accelerometers was used for the analysis. We calculated the Activity Index for labeled data segments and used ANOVA1 statistical test with Bonferroni correction. Significant differences were found between cases of hand usage (left, right, none, both). In the next analysis phase, the Activity Index was used as the classification feature with three supervised machine learning algorithms-Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbors, and Random Forest. The best accuracy (measured by F1 score) of classifying hand usage was achieved by using the Random Forest algorithm, 50 Hz sampling frequency, and a window of 10 s without overlap for AI calculation, and it was 97%. On the other hand, the classification of activity groups had a low accuracy, which indicated that a specific activity group can?t be identified by using only one simple feature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Serbian Journal of Electrical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Serbian Journal of Electrical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/sjee2202225m\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serbian Journal of Electrical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/sjee2202225m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

活动监测是一种评估一个人在一段时间内进行的身体活动的技术。活动指数(AI)是总结三轴加速度计原始测量值的度量,通常用于测量身体活动。我们的研究比较了不同活动组的活动指数和手的使用情况。我们还测试了这个度量作为分类特征,以及不同的数据采集和分割参数配置如何影响分类准确性。数据采集是通过先前开发的系统完成的,该系统包括每个手腕上的智能手表和放置在受试者体内的智能手机。年代的口袋里;使用智能手表加速度计的原始数据进行分析。我们计算了标记数据段的活动指数,并使用Bonferroni校正的ANOVA1统计检验。在使用左手、右手、不使用、两者都使用的情况下,发现了显著的差异。在下一个分析阶段,活动指数被用作三种监督机器学习算法(支持向量机,k近邻和随机森林)的分类特征。采用Random Forest算法,采样频率为50 Hz, AI计算窗口为10 s无重叠,手部使用分类准确率最高(以F1分数衡量),达到97%。另一方面,活动组的分类准确率较低,这表明特定的活动组可以?我不能只用一个简单的特征来识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility test of activity index summary metric in human hand activity recognition
Activity monitoring is a technique for assessing the physical activity that a person undertakes over some time. Activity Index (AI) is a metric that summarizes the raw measurements from tri-axial accelerometers, often used for measuring physical activity. Our research compared the Activity Index for different activity groups and hand usage [1]. We also tested this metric as a classification feature, and how different data acquisition and segmentation parameter configurations influence classification accuracy. Data acquisition was done with a previously developed system that includes a smartwatch on each wrist and a smartphone placed in the subject?s pocket; raw data from smartwatch accelerometers was used for the analysis. We calculated the Activity Index for labeled data segments and used ANOVA1 statistical test with Bonferroni correction. Significant differences were found between cases of hand usage (left, right, none, both). In the next analysis phase, the Activity Index was used as the classification feature with three supervised machine learning algorithms-Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbors, and Random Forest. The best accuracy (measured by F1 score) of classifying hand usage was achieved by using the Random Forest algorithm, 50 Hz sampling frequency, and a window of 10 s without overlap for AI calculation, and it was 97%. On the other hand, the classification of activity groups had a low accuracy, which indicated that a specific activity group can?t be identified by using only one simple feature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Serbian Journal of Electrical Engineering
Serbian Journal of Electrical Engineering Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: The main aims of the Journal are to publish peer review papers giving results of the fundamental and applied research in the field of electrical engineering. The Journal covers a wide scope of problems in the following scientific fields: Applied and Theoretical Electromagnetics, Instrumentation and Measurement, Power Engineering, Power Systems, Electrical Machines, Electrical Drives, Electronics, Telecommunications, Computer Engineering, Automatic Control and Systems, Mechatronics, Electrical Materials, Information Technologies, Engineering Mathematics, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信