卡拉瓦乔，穆尔托拉和“水母毒发”

IF 0.1 3区艺术学 0 ART

Artibus et Historiae Pub Date : 2004-01-01 DOI:10.2307/1483752

M. Marini

{"title":"卡拉瓦乔，穆尔托拉和“水母毒发”","authors":"M. Marini","doi":"10.2307/1483752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article explores a version of the Head of Medusa by Caravaggio which was known to the contemporary poet Murtola and must evidently have been distinct from the celebrated version in Florence painted for the Grand Duke of Tuscany. Marini's arguments (which included X-radiographs showing substantial changes of mind - including that of an eye in a completely different position) are all the more convincing as in the list of objects in the possession of Caravaggio in August 1605, there appears 'una rotella', which must be the picture known to Murtola.","PeriodicalId":43492,"journal":{"name":"Artibus et Historiae","volume":"11 1","pages":"175-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1483752","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Caravaggio, Murtola e \\\"la chioma avvelenata di Medusa\\\"\",\"authors\":\"M. Marini\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1483752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article explores a version of the Head of Medusa by Caravaggio which was known to the contemporary poet Murtola and must evidently have been distinct from the celebrated version in Florence painted for the Grand Duke of Tuscany. Marini's arguments (which included X-radiographs showing substantial changes of mind - including that of an eye in a completely different position) are all the more convincing as in the list of objects in the possession of Caravaggio in August 1605, there appears 'una rotella', which must be the picture known to Murtola.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artibus et Historiae\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"175-184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1483752\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artibus et Historiae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1483752\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artibus et Historiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1483752","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章探讨了卡拉瓦乔的《美杜莎的头》的一个版本，这个版本为当代诗人穆尔托拉所熟知，显然与佛罗伦萨为托斯卡纳大公所画的著名版本截然不同。马里尼的论点(包括x光照片显示了思想的重大变化——包括眼睛处于完全不同的位置)更有说服力，因为在卡拉瓦乔1605年8月拥有的物品清单中，出现了“una rotella”，这一定是穆尔托拉所知道的那幅画。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Caravaggio, Murtola e "la chioma avvelenata di Medusa"

The article explores a version of the Head of Medusa by Caravaggio which was known to the contemporary poet Murtola and must evidently have been distinct from the celebrated version in Florence painted for the Grand Duke of Tuscany. Marini's arguments (which included X-radiographs showing substantial changes of mind - including that of an eye in a completely different position) are all the more convincing as in the list of objects in the possession of Caravaggio in August 1605, there appears 'una rotella', which must be the picture known to Murtola.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Artibus et Historiae ART-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Artibus et Historiae is a journal dedicated to the visual arts, published by IRSA Publishing House. The lavishly illustrated articles cover a broad range of subjects, including photography and film, as well as traditional topics of scholarly art research. Artibus et Historiae particularly encourages interdisciplinary studies - art history in conjunction with other humanistic fields, such as psychology, sociology, philosophy, or literature - and unconventional approaches. Thus it is hoped that the current trends in art history will be well represented in our issues. Artibus et Historiae appears twice a year, in hardback. The articles are in one of four languages: English, Italian, German, or French, at the author"s discretion.