{"title":"马西亚斯纪念碑:佛罗伦萨新圣器室的剥皮墙和呼应空间","authors":"Charles A. Burroughs","doi":"10.2307/1483712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Medici Chapel in Florence, designed by Michelangelo, is an excellent testcase for a recent shift in the discipline of Art History to metonymic method, i.e., emphasizing spatial (and other) contiguity rather than text- based iconography. In the 1440s Cosimo de' Medici, effective ruler of Florence since 1434, built his great palace and assumed sole responsibility for the reconstruction of the nearby church of San Lorenzo. The palace faced away from the church, a symbolic disjunction that troubled successive generations of Medici. In the early 1520s, Michelangelo produced various designs, none executed, for the entrance wall of the Medici Chapel with the tombs of Lorenzo the Magnificent and his brother. This article argues that the two latest known designs both suggest a connection between the chapel and spaces beyond, but with profoundly different ideological resonances. One recalls the triumphal, classical architecture of Michelangelo's abandoned facade project for the church and, further back, celebrations of Medici power in the city at large. The other refers to the high altar of the basilica itself, near Cosimo's tomb. The dissected architectural forms of the second design evoke the myth of Marsyas, the flayed satyr, as do motifs in the chapel's executed decoration. Such allusions link the chapel with the garden of the Medici Palace, where ancient statues of Marsyas flanked the portal that led out toward the church. Set up by Cosimo and Lorenzo, these statues entered into a complex set of echoes with other statues in the palace garden and courtyard. The reference to Marsyas is not just a matter of iconography, but also of a radically innovative conception of the possibilities of architectural signification, while inviting reflection on the historical roles and fortunes of the Medici themselves.","PeriodicalId":43492,"journal":{"name":"Artibus et Historiae","volume":"22 1","pages":"31-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1483712","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monuments of Marsyas: Flayed Wall and Echoing Space in the New Sacristy, Florence\",\"authors\":\"Charles A. Burroughs\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1483712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Medici Chapel in Florence, designed by Michelangelo, is an excellent testcase for a recent shift in the discipline of Art History to metonymic method, i.e., emphasizing spatial (and other) contiguity rather than text- based iconography. In the 1440s Cosimo de' Medici, effective ruler of Florence since 1434, built his great palace and assumed sole responsibility for the reconstruction of the nearby church of San Lorenzo. The palace faced away from the church, a symbolic disjunction that troubled successive generations of Medici. In the early 1520s, Michelangelo produced various designs, none executed, for the entrance wall of the Medici Chapel with the tombs of Lorenzo the Magnificent and his brother. This article argues that the two latest known designs both suggest a connection between the chapel and spaces beyond, but with profoundly different ideological resonances. One recalls the triumphal, classical architecture of Michelangelo's abandoned facade project for the church and, further back, celebrations of Medici power in the city at large. The other refers to the high altar of the basilica itself, near Cosimo's tomb. The dissected architectural forms of the second design evoke the myth of Marsyas, the flayed satyr, as do motifs in the chapel's executed decoration. Such allusions link the chapel with the garden of the Medici Palace, where ancient statues of Marsyas flanked the portal that led out toward the church. Set up by Cosimo and Lorenzo, these statues entered into a complex set of echoes with other statues in the palace garden and courtyard. The reference to Marsyas is not just a matter of iconography, but also of a radically innovative conception of the possibilities of architectural signification, while inviting reflection on the historical roles and fortunes of the Medici themselves.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artibus et Historiae\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"31-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1483712\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artibus et Historiae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1483712\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artibus et Historiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1483712","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
米开朗基罗设计的佛罗伦萨美第奇教堂是最近艺术史学科向转喻方法转变的一个很好的测试案例,即强调空间(和其他)的连续性,而不是基于文本的图像学。在14世纪40年代,科西莫·德·美第奇(Cosimo de' Medici)自1434年以来一直是佛罗伦萨的实际统治者,他建造了自己伟大的宫殿,并全权负责重建附近的圣洛伦佐教堂。宫殿背对着教堂,这种象征性的分离困扰了几代美第奇家族。在1520年代早期,米开朗基罗为美第奇教堂的入口墙设计了各种各样的设计,但没有一个被执行,里面有宏伟的洛伦佐和他哥哥的坟墓。本文认为,这两个最新的设计都暗示了教堂和空间之间的联系,但有着截然不同的意识形态共鸣。人们回忆起米开朗基罗为教堂设计的被遗弃的凯旋的、古典的立面建筑,以及更久远的美第奇家族在整个城市的权力庆祝活动。另一个指的是大教堂本身的高祭坛,靠近科西莫的坟墓。第二个设计的解剖建筑形式唤起了马西亚斯的神话,被剥皮的森林之神,教堂装饰的主题也是如此。这样的暗示将教堂与美第奇宫的花园联系在一起,在那里,通往教堂的大门两侧是古代马斯亚斯的雕像。这些雕像由科西莫和洛伦佐设计,与宫殿花园和庭院中的其他雕像形成了复杂的呼应。对Marsyas的参考不仅仅是图像学的问题,也是对建筑意义可能性的一种彻底的创新概念,同时也引起了对美第奇家族本身的历史角色和命运的反思。
Monuments of Marsyas: Flayed Wall and Echoing Space in the New Sacristy, Florence
The Medici Chapel in Florence, designed by Michelangelo, is an excellent testcase for a recent shift in the discipline of Art History to metonymic method, i.e., emphasizing spatial (and other) contiguity rather than text- based iconography. In the 1440s Cosimo de' Medici, effective ruler of Florence since 1434, built his great palace and assumed sole responsibility for the reconstruction of the nearby church of San Lorenzo. The palace faced away from the church, a symbolic disjunction that troubled successive generations of Medici. In the early 1520s, Michelangelo produced various designs, none executed, for the entrance wall of the Medici Chapel with the tombs of Lorenzo the Magnificent and his brother. This article argues that the two latest known designs both suggest a connection between the chapel and spaces beyond, but with profoundly different ideological resonances. One recalls the triumphal, classical architecture of Michelangelo's abandoned facade project for the church and, further back, celebrations of Medici power in the city at large. The other refers to the high altar of the basilica itself, near Cosimo's tomb. The dissected architectural forms of the second design evoke the myth of Marsyas, the flayed satyr, as do motifs in the chapel's executed decoration. Such allusions link the chapel with the garden of the Medici Palace, where ancient statues of Marsyas flanked the portal that led out toward the church. Set up by Cosimo and Lorenzo, these statues entered into a complex set of echoes with other statues in the palace garden and courtyard. The reference to Marsyas is not just a matter of iconography, but also of a radically innovative conception of the possibilities of architectural signification, while inviting reflection on the historical roles and fortunes of the Medici themselves.
期刊介绍:
Artibus et Historiae is a journal dedicated to the visual arts, published by IRSA Publishing House. The lavishly illustrated articles cover a broad range of subjects, including photography and film, as well as traditional topics of scholarly art research. Artibus et Historiae particularly encourages interdisciplinary studies - art history in conjunction with other humanistic fields, such as psychology, sociology, philosophy, or literature - and unconventional approaches. Thus it is hoped that the current trends in art history will be well represented in our issues. Artibus et Historiae appears twice a year, in hardback. The articles are in one of four languages: English, Italian, German, or French, at the author"s discretion.