城市数学课堂公平的根本重构:数学与身体的飞行路线:课堂中的物质纠葛

Q4 Social Sciences
S. Cannon, Kayla D. Myers
{"title":"城市数学课堂公平的根本重构:数学与身体的飞行路线:课堂中的物质纠葛","authors":"S. Cannon, Kayla D. Myers","doi":"10.21423/jume-v9i2a314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"n Mathematics and the Body: Material Entanglements in the Classroom by Elizabeth de Freitas and Nathalie Sinclair (2014), the authors call for a “radical reconfiguring” (p. 225) of mathematics education. Similarly, Barad (2012) argues that “theories are living and breathing reconfigurings of the world” (p. 207) and that putting new materialist and posthumanist theories to work in mathematics education could open up a space for this radical reconfiguring. This book review is based on our developing thinking about the use of theory and its possibilities within urban mathematics education. We situate ourselves in what de Freitas and Sinclair call a “stretchy space of continuous transformation” (pp. 90–91)—continuing to think and re-think issues like equity with this text, letting the words wash over us (St. Pierre, 2003), opening up and questioning urban mathematics education research. As two White women mathematics educators and emerging scholars in the field, we do not assert that theory alone or theory removed from practice can address the complex, prevalent, and long-lasting inequities present in mathematics education; however, we view theory in concert with practice as having potential to advance the field. de Freitas and Sinclair’s theories, which they use to question school mathematics in general, could be built upon and deployed to expose the problematic presence of White rationality (Martin, 2015) in urban classrooms. We encourage the reader to join us in this stretchy space and embrace the potentialities of the book as an as-","PeriodicalId":36435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mathematics Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radical Reconfiguring(s) for Equity in Urban Mathematics Classrooms: Lines of Flight in Mathematics and the Body: Material Entanglements in the Classroom\",\"authors\":\"S. Cannon, Kayla D. Myers\",\"doi\":\"10.21423/jume-v9i2a314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"n Mathematics and the Body: Material Entanglements in the Classroom by Elizabeth de Freitas and Nathalie Sinclair (2014), the authors call for a “radical reconfiguring” (p. 225) of mathematics education. Similarly, Barad (2012) argues that “theories are living and breathing reconfigurings of the world” (p. 207) and that putting new materialist and posthumanist theories to work in mathematics education could open up a space for this radical reconfiguring. This book review is based on our developing thinking about the use of theory and its possibilities within urban mathematics education. We situate ourselves in what de Freitas and Sinclair call a “stretchy space of continuous transformation” (pp. 90–91)—continuing to think and re-think issues like equity with this text, letting the words wash over us (St. Pierre, 2003), opening up and questioning urban mathematics education research. As two White women mathematics educators and emerging scholars in the field, we do not assert that theory alone or theory removed from practice can address the complex, prevalent, and long-lasting inequities present in mathematics education; however, we view theory in concert with practice as having potential to advance the field. de Freitas and Sinclair’s theories, which they use to question school mathematics in general, could be built upon and deployed to expose the problematic presence of White rationality (Martin, 2015) in urban classrooms. We encourage the reader to join us in this stretchy space and embrace the potentialities of the book as an as-\",\"PeriodicalId\":36435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v9i2a314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v9i2a314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

在Elizabeth de Freitas和Nathalie Sinclair(2014)的《数学与身体:课堂中的物质纠缠》一书中,作者呼吁对数学教育进行“彻底的重新配置”(第225页)。类似地,Barad(2012)认为“理论是世界的活的和呼吸的重新配置”(第207页),并且将新的唯物主义和后人文主义理论应用于数学教育可以为这种激进的重新配置开辟空间。这篇书评是基于我们对理论在城市数学教育中的应用及其可能性的发展思考。我们将自己置身于德弗雷塔斯和辛克莱所说的“持续转型的弹性空间”(第90-91页)中——继续思考和重新思考像公平这样的问题,让这些词语在我们的脑海中冲刷(St. Pierre, 2003),开放和质疑城市数学教育研究。作为两名白人女性数学教育家和该领域的新兴学者,我们并不认为理论本身或脱离实践的理论可以解决数学教育中存在的复杂、普遍和长期存在的不平等现象;然而,我们认为理论与实践相一致,具有推动该领域发展的潜力。de Freitas和Sinclair的理论,他们用这些理论来质疑学校数学,可以建立并部署在城市教室中暴露白人理性的问题存在(Martin, 2015)。我们鼓励读者加入我们,在这个广阔的空间里,拥抱这本书的潜力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radical Reconfiguring(s) for Equity in Urban Mathematics Classrooms: Lines of Flight in Mathematics and the Body: Material Entanglements in the Classroom
n Mathematics and the Body: Material Entanglements in the Classroom by Elizabeth de Freitas and Nathalie Sinclair (2014), the authors call for a “radical reconfiguring” (p. 225) of mathematics education. Similarly, Barad (2012) argues that “theories are living and breathing reconfigurings of the world” (p. 207) and that putting new materialist and posthumanist theories to work in mathematics education could open up a space for this radical reconfiguring. This book review is based on our developing thinking about the use of theory and its possibilities within urban mathematics education. We situate ourselves in what de Freitas and Sinclair call a “stretchy space of continuous transformation” (pp. 90–91)—continuing to think and re-think issues like equity with this text, letting the words wash over us (St. Pierre, 2003), opening up and questioning urban mathematics education research. As two White women mathematics educators and emerging scholars in the field, we do not assert that theory alone or theory removed from practice can address the complex, prevalent, and long-lasting inequities present in mathematics education; however, we view theory in concert with practice as having potential to advance the field. de Freitas and Sinclair’s theories, which they use to question school mathematics in general, could be built upon and deployed to expose the problematic presence of White rationality (Martin, 2015) in urban classrooms. We encourage the reader to join us in this stretchy space and embrace the potentialities of the book as an as-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Mathematics Education
Journal of Urban Mathematics Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信