{"title":"印第安人和人类学家:小瓦因·德洛里亚和人类学批判","authors":"T. Biolsi, L. Zimmerman","doi":"10.2307/1185930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1969 Vine Deloria, Jr., in his controversial book Custer Died for Your Sins, criticized the anthropological community for its impersonal dissection of living Native American cultures. Twenty-five years later, anthropologists have become more sensitive to Native American concerns, and Indian people have become more active in fighting for accurate representations of their cultures. In this collection of essays, Indian and non-Indian scholars examine how the relationship between anthropology and Indians has changed over that quarter-century and show how controversial this issue remains. Practitioners of cultural anthropology, archaeology, education, and history provide multiple lenses through which to view how Deloria's message has been interpreted or misinterpreted. Among the contributions are comments on Deloria's criticisms, thoughts on the reburial issue, and views on the ethnographic study of specific peoples. A final contribution by Deloria himself puts the issue of anthropologist/Indian interaction in the context of the century's end. CONTENTS-Introduction: What's Changed, What Hasn't, Thomas Biolsi & Larry J. Zimmerman-Part One--Deloria Writes Back-Vine Deloria, Jr., in American Historiography, Herbert T. Hoover-Growing Up on Deloria: The Impact of His Work on a New Generation of Anthropologists, Elizabeth S. Grobsmith-Educating an Anthro: The Influence of Vine Deloria, Jr., Murray L. Wax-Part Two--Archaeology and American Indians-Why Have Archaeologists Thought That the Real Indians Were Dead and What Can We Do about It?, Randall H. McGuire-Anthropology and Responses to the Reburial Issue, Larry J. Zimmerman-Part Three-Ethnography and Colonialism-Here Come the Anthros, Cecil King-Beyond Ethics: Science, Friendship and Privacy, Marilyn Bentz: The Anthropological Construction of Indians: Haviland Scudder Mekeel and the Search for the Primitive in Lakota Country, Thomas Biolsi-Informant as Critic: Conducting Research on a Dispute between Iroquoianist Scholars and Traditional Iroquois, Gail Landsman: The End of Anthropology (at Hopi)?, Peter Whiteley-Conclusion: Anthros, Indians and Planetary Reality, Vine Deloria, Jr.-","PeriodicalId":80425,"journal":{"name":"American Indian quarterly","volume":"23 1","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1185930","citationCount":"77","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indians and anthropologists : Vine Deloria, Jr., and the critique of anthropology\",\"authors\":\"T. Biolsi, L. Zimmerman\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1185930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1969 Vine Deloria, Jr., in his controversial book Custer Died for Your Sins, criticized the anthropological community for its impersonal dissection of living Native American cultures. Twenty-five years later, anthropologists have become more sensitive to Native American concerns, and Indian people have become more active in fighting for accurate representations of their cultures. In this collection of essays, Indian and non-Indian scholars examine how the relationship between anthropology and Indians has changed over that quarter-century and show how controversial this issue remains. Practitioners of cultural anthropology, archaeology, education, and history provide multiple lenses through which to view how Deloria's message has been interpreted or misinterpreted. Among the contributions are comments on Deloria's criticisms, thoughts on the reburial issue, and views on the ethnographic study of specific peoples. A final contribution by Deloria himself puts the issue of anthropologist/Indian interaction in the context of the century's end. CONTENTS-Introduction: What's Changed, What Hasn't, Thomas Biolsi & Larry J. Zimmerman-Part One--Deloria Writes Back-Vine Deloria, Jr., in American Historiography, Herbert T. Hoover-Growing Up on Deloria: The Impact of His Work on a New Generation of Anthropologists, Elizabeth S. Grobsmith-Educating an Anthro: The Influence of Vine Deloria, Jr., Murray L. Wax-Part Two--Archaeology and American Indians-Why Have Archaeologists Thought That the Real Indians Were Dead and What Can We Do about It?, Randall H. McGuire-Anthropology and Responses to the Reburial Issue, Larry J. Zimmerman-Part Three-Ethnography and Colonialism-Here Come the Anthros, Cecil King-Beyond Ethics: Science, Friendship and Privacy, Marilyn Bentz: The Anthropological Construction of Indians: Haviland Scudder Mekeel and the Search for the Primitive in Lakota Country, Thomas Biolsi-Informant as Critic: Conducting Research on a Dispute between Iroquoianist Scholars and Traditional Iroquois, Gail Landsman: The End of Anthropology (at Hopi)?, Peter Whiteley-Conclusion: Anthros, Indians and Planetary Reality, Vine Deloria, Jr.-\",\"PeriodicalId\":80425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Indian quarterly\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1185930\",\"citationCount\":\"77\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Indian quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1185930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Indian quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1185930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 77
摘要
1969年,小瓦因·德洛里亚(Vine Deloria, Jr.)在他颇具争议的著作《卡斯特为你的罪而死》(Custer dead for Your Sins)中,批评人类学团体对现存的美洲原住民文化进行非个人的剖析。25年后,人类学家对印第安人的关切变得更加敏感,印第安人也更加积极地争取准确地反映他们的文化。在这本论文集中,印度和非印度学者研究了人类学和印度人之间的关系在过去的25年里是如何变化的,并表明这个问题仍然存在争议。文化人类学、考古学、教育学和历史学的实践者提供了多种视角,通过这些视角来观察德洛里亚的信息是如何被解读或误解的。其中包括对德洛里亚的批评的评论,对重葬问题的思考,以及对特定民族的民族志研究的看法。德洛里亚自己的最后一个贡献是把人类学家/印度人的互动问题放在本世纪末的背景下。CONTENTS-Introduction:改变是什么,没有什么,托马斯Biolsi &拉里·j·Zimmerman-Part——Deloria写道Back-Vine Deloria, Jr .)在美国史学,赫伯特·t·Hoover-Growing Deloria:上的影响他的工作在新一代的人类学家,伊丽莎白·s·Grobsmith-Educating人类学:统合的影响,Jr .)穆雷l . Wax-Part两个——考古学和美国Indians-Why考古学家认为真正的印度人都死了,我们能做些什么呢?,兰德尔·h·麦圭尔——人类学与对重葬问题的回应,拉里·齐默尔曼——人种学与殖民主义——人类来了,塞西尔·金——超越伦理:科学、友谊与隐私,玛丽莲·本茨:印第安人的人类学建构:哈维兰·斯卡德尔·米基尔与拉科塔地区的原始探索,托马斯·比奥尔——作为批评家的信息者:易洛魁学者与传统易洛魁人之争的研究,盖尔·兰兹曼。人类学的终结(霍皮语)?《结论:人类、印第安人和行星现实》,藤·德洛里亚,Jr.
Indians and anthropologists : Vine Deloria, Jr., and the critique of anthropology
In 1969 Vine Deloria, Jr., in his controversial book Custer Died for Your Sins, criticized the anthropological community for its impersonal dissection of living Native American cultures. Twenty-five years later, anthropologists have become more sensitive to Native American concerns, and Indian people have become more active in fighting for accurate representations of their cultures. In this collection of essays, Indian and non-Indian scholars examine how the relationship between anthropology and Indians has changed over that quarter-century and show how controversial this issue remains. Practitioners of cultural anthropology, archaeology, education, and history provide multiple lenses through which to view how Deloria's message has been interpreted or misinterpreted. Among the contributions are comments on Deloria's criticisms, thoughts on the reburial issue, and views on the ethnographic study of specific peoples. A final contribution by Deloria himself puts the issue of anthropologist/Indian interaction in the context of the century's end. CONTENTS-Introduction: What's Changed, What Hasn't, Thomas Biolsi & Larry J. Zimmerman-Part One--Deloria Writes Back-Vine Deloria, Jr., in American Historiography, Herbert T. Hoover-Growing Up on Deloria: The Impact of His Work on a New Generation of Anthropologists, Elizabeth S. Grobsmith-Educating an Anthro: The Influence of Vine Deloria, Jr., Murray L. Wax-Part Two--Archaeology and American Indians-Why Have Archaeologists Thought That the Real Indians Were Dead and What Can We Do about It?, Randall H. McGuire-Anthropology and Responses to the Reburial Issue, Larry J. Zimmerman-Part Three-Ethnography and Colonialism-Here Come the Anthros, Cecil King-Beyond Ethics: Science, Friendship and Privacy, Marilyn Bentz: The Anthropological Construction of Indians: Haviland Scudder Mekeel and the Search for the Primitive in Lakota Country, Thomas Biolsi-Informant as Critic: Conducting Research on a Dispute between Iroquoianist Scholars and Traditional Iroquois, Gail Landsman: The End of Anthropology (at Hopi)?, Peter Whiteley-Conclusion: Anthros, Indians and Planetary Reality, Vine Deloria, Jr.-