{"title":"基鲁姆的九命,派托昆黑特","authors":"H. Dobyns, R. Euler","doi":"10.2307/1184818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and is. \"The majority of ethnological reports on North American Indian cultures that were written by American-trained ethnologists during the period 1910-40 were couched in the 'ethnographic present' and purported to describe the 'aboriginal' cultures of various Indian groups.\"2 That is, anthropologists having a \"normative\" perception of culture pattern essentially ignored historical changes in Native American cultures and behaviors.' This ahistorical presentation of static culture characterized classic theoretical formulations as well as ethnographies of specific groups, including the Walapais and Havasupais.4 Ethnohistorical studies of cultural change during four decades have demonstrated that no \"traditional ethnographic present\" ever existed.' Yet studies continue to be published presenting data in an \"ethnographic present\" that ignores preceding key events that shaped the defectively depicted situation.6 As J. A. Paredes recently pointed out, moreover, the fallacy of the \"ethnographic present\" is but a single step removed from the racist fallacy that anthropological pioneer Franz Boas began refuting more than a century ago.7 Cherum's quite varied life experiences emphasize how key events occurring in the course of Native-newcomer interactions rapidly and significantly change the cultures and behaviors of both groups.8","PeriodicalId":80425,"journal":{"name":"American Indian quarterly","volume":"133 1","pages":"363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1184818","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Nine Lives of Cherum, the Pai Tokumhet\",\"authors\":\"H. Dobyns, R. Euler\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1184818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"and is. \\\"The majority of ethnological reports on North American Indian cultures that were written by American-trained ethnologists during the period 1910-40 were couched in the 'ethnographic present' and purported to describe the 'aboriginal' cultures of various Indian groups.\\\"2 That is, anthropologists having a \\\"normative\\\" perception of culture pattern essentially ignored historical changes in Native American cultures and behaviors.' This ahistorical presentation of static culture characterized classic theoretical formulations as well as ethnographies of specific groups, including the Walapais and Havasupais.4 Ethnohistorical studies of cultural change during four decades have demonstrated that no \\\"traditional ethnographic present\\\" ever existed.' Yet studies continue to be published presenting data in an \\\"ethnographic present\\\" that ignores preceding key events that shaped the defectively depicted situation.6 As J. A. Paredes recently pointed out, moreover, the fallacy of the \\\"ethnographic present\\\" is but a single step removed from the racist fallacy that anthropological pioneer Franz Boas began refuting more than a century ago.7 Cherum's quite varied life experiences emphasize how key events occurring in the course of Native-newcomer interactions rapidly and significantly change the cultures and behaviors of both groups.8\",\"PeriodicalId\":80425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Indian quarterly\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1184818\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Indian quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1184818\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Indian quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1184818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
和是多少。“1910年至1940年期间,在美国受过训练的民族学家撰写的关于北美印第安文化的人种学报告,大多数都是在‘当代人种学’中编写的,旨在描述各种印第安群体的‘土著’文化。”2也就是说,人类学家对文化模式有一种“规范”的看法,本质上忽略了美洲原住民文化和行为的历史变化。这种静态文化的非历史呈现是经典理论表述和特定群体的民族志的特征,包括瓦拉派人和哈瓦苏派人。4四十年来对文化变化的民族历史研究表明,从来没有“传统的民族志现在”存在过。然而,继续发表的研究以一种“人种学现状”的方式呈现数据,忽视了之前形成有缺陷的描述情况的关键事件此外,正如J. a .帕雷德斯最近所指出的,“人种学现在”的谬论与人类学先驱弗朗茨·博阿斯在一个多世纪前开始驳斥的种族主义谬论只有一步之遥切鲁姆丰富多彩的生活经历强调了在土著与新移民互动过程中发生的关键事件如何迅速而显著地改变了两个群体的文化和行为
and is. "The majority of ethnological reports on North American Indian cultures that were written by American-trained ethnologists during the period 1910-40 were couched in the 'ethnographic present' and purported to describe the 'aboriginal' cultures of various Indian groups."2 That is, anthropologists having a "normative" perception of culture pattern essentially ignored historical changes in Native American cultures and behaviors.' This ahistorical presentation of static culture characterized classic theoretical formulations as well as ethnographies of specific groups, including the Walapais and Havasupais.4 Ethnohistorical studies of cultural change during four decades have demonstrated that no "traditional ethnographic present" ever existed.' Yet studies continue to be published presenting data in an "ethnographic present" that ignores preceding key events that shaped the defectively depicted situation.6 As J. A. Paredes recently pointed out, moreover, the fallacy of the "ethnographic present" is but a single step removed from the racist fallacy that anthropological pioneer Franz Boas began refuting more than a century ago.7 Cherum's quite varied life experiences emphasize how key events occurring in the course of Native-newcomer interactions rapidly and significantly change the cultures and behaviors of both groups.8