表达积极评价的言语体裁划分原则

T. Anisimova, S. Chubay
{"title":"表达积极评价的言语体裁划分原则","authors":"T. Anisimova, S. Chubay","doi":"10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-3-519-533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the possibility question of an unambiguous distinction between genres close in meaning, included in the same thematic group. The aim of the study is to describe the rhetorical parameters of the genres of praise, approval, compliment and flattery, which are included in the genres group of a positive assessment of a person and his actions, as well as to develop criteria for distinguishing between these genres. All genres belonging to this group are united by the addresser position: he experiences (or pretends to experience) one or another positive attitude, which he wants to notify the addressee about. The rhetorical features of all genres of the group are described in detail and the characteristics by which they can be distinguished are highlighted. Praise is considered to be the group central element of positively evaluative genres. A comparison of praise with other genres shows that the differences most often relate to the object of evaluation (in praise, the object is a person, and in approval, ideas, projects and other products of intellectual activity) and the nature of the assessments used (praise is based on objective assessments, and compliments are based on subjective assessments).","PeriodicalId":34441,"journal":{"name":"Neofilologiia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Principles of delimitation of speech genres expressing a positive assessment\",\"authors\":\"T. Anisimova, S. Chubay\",\"doi\":\"10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-3-519-533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider the possibility question of an unambiguous distinction between genres close in meaning, included in the same thematic group. The aim of the study is to describe the rhetorical parameters of the genres of praise, approval, compliment and flattery, which are included in the genres group of a positive assessment of a person and his actions, as well as to develop criteria for distinguishing between these genres. All genres belonging to this group are united by the addresser position: he experiences (or pretends to experience) one or another positive attitude, which he wants to notify the addressee about. The rhetorical features of all genres of the group are described in detail and the characteristics by which they can be distinguished are highlighted. Praise is considered to be the group central element of positively evaluative genres. A comparison of praise with other genres shows that the differences most often relate to the object of evaluation (in praise, the object is a person, and in approval, ideas, projects and other products of intellectual activity) and the nature of the assessments used (praise is based on objective assessments, and compliments are based on subjective assessments).\",\"PeriodicalId\":34441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neofilologiia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neofilologiia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-3-519-533\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neofilologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-3-519-533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们考虑在同一主题组中,在意义相近的类型之间明确区分的可能性问题。本研究的目的是描述表扬、赞同、赞美和奉承等类型的修辞参数,这些类型包括在对一个人及其行为的积极评价的类型组中,并制定区分这些类型的标准。属于这一类的所有体裁都由说话人的立场统一起来:他经历(或假装经历)一种或另一种积极的态度,他想通知收件人。详细描述了该组所有类型的修辞特征,并强调了它们可以区分的特征。赞扬被认为是积极评价体裁的核心元素。将赞美与其他类型的赞美进行比较可以发现,差异通常与评价的对象(在赞美中,对象是一个人,在批准、想法、项目和其他智力活动的产物中)和所使用的评价的性质(赞美基于客观评价,而赞美基于主观评价)有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Principles of delimitation of speech genres expressing a positive assessment
We consider the possibility question of an unambiguous distinction between genres close in meaning, included in the same thematic group. The aim of the study is to describe the rhetorical parameters of the genres of praise, approval, compliment and flattery, which are included in the genres group of a positive assessment of a person and his actions, as well as to develop criteria for distinguishing between these genres. All genres belonging to this group are united by the addresser position: he experiences (or pretends to experience) one or another positive attitude, which he wants to notify the addressee about. The rhetorical features of all genres of the group are described in detail and the characteristics by which they can be distinguished are highlighted. Praise is considered to be the group central element of positively evaluative genres. A comparison of praise with other genres shows that the differences most often relate to the object of evaluation (in praise, the object is a person, and in approval, ideas, projects and other products of intellectual activity) and the nature of the assessments used (praise is based on objective assessments, and compliments are based on subjective assessments).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信