托尔斯泰“民间思想”在奥库扎娃作品中的体现

E. Ivanov
{"title":"托尔斯泰“民间思想”在奥库扎娃作品中的体现","authors":"E. Ivanov","doi":"10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-2-338-347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of the axiological role of Russian literature in creating the humanitarian image of Russia is focused. Attention is focused on the seeming incompatibility of pacifist views and positions of the unconditional need to defend the Motherland in the Patriotic Wars. The positions of L. Tolstoy and B. Okudzhava on this issue are compared in the light of the concept of the synthetic theory of P.N. Sakulin, which determines the continuity of ideas in culture. The diachronic differences in the formation of the image of the Russian people as a defender of their land at the cost of self-sacrifice are analyzed. The meaning of the concept of “people” in different periods of historical time and its refraction in a changing social context are problematized. In this regard, a spiritual invariant is fixed, which retains its role in culture from A.S. Pushkin to the present day. Based on the texts of B. Okudzhava’s poems, the solution of the contradictions between pacifism, the rejection of war and the defense of the fatherland as a modus of saving the “land” from universal evil, which is not tied to any particular nation, is substantiated. It has been established that L. Tolstoy metaphorizes the people-defender in the image of a bee swarm – in a dynamic quality, while B. Okudzhava presents the same idea in a monolithic-phytomorphic form of a tree-like “growing” into the ground. It is proved that Russia is depicted in its natural right, and the natural right to protect the habitat from violent invasion determines the humanitarian image of Russia. The all-human pathos of denial of aggression in the work of these authors is emphasized.","PeriodicalId":34441,"journal":{"name":"Neofilologiia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emanation of L. Tolstoy’s “folk thought” in the work of B. Okudzhava\",\"authors\":\"E. Ivanov\",\"doi\":\"10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-2-338-347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The issue of the axiological role of Russian literature in creating the humanitarian image of Russia is focused. Attention is focused on the seeming incompatibility of pacifist views and positions of the unconditional need to defend the Motherland in the Patriotic Wars. The positions of L. Tolstoy and B. Okudzhava on this issue are compared in the light of the concept of the synthetic theory of P.N. Sakulin, which determines the continuity of ideas in culture. The diachronic differences in the formation of the image of the Russian people as a defender of their land at the cost of self-sacrifice are analyzed. The meaning of the concept of “people” in different periods of historical time and its refraction in a changing social context are problematized. In this regard, a spiritual invariant is fixed, which retains its role in culture from A.S. Pushkin to the present day. Based on the texts of B. Okudzhava’s poems, the solution of the contradictions between pacifism, the rejection of war and the defense of the fatherland as a modus of saving the “land” from universal evil, which is not tied to any particular nation, is substantiated. It has been established that L. Tolstoy metaphorizes the people-defender in the image of a bee swarm – in a dynamic quality, while B. Okudzhava presents the same idea in a monolithic-phytomorphic form of a tree-like “growing” into the ground. It is proved that Russia is depicted in its natural right, and the natural right to protect the habitat from violent invasion determines the humanitarian image of Russia. The all-human pathos of denial of aggression in the work of these authors is emphasized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neofilologiia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neofilologiia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-2-338-347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neofilologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-2-338-347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

着重论述了俄罗斯文学在塑造俄罗斯人道主义形象中的价值作用问题。人们的注意力集中在和平主义观点和无条件需要在卫国战争中保卫祖国的立场之间似乎不相容的问题上。从萨库林的综合理论的概念出发,比较了托尔斯泰和奥库扎娃在这一问题上的立场,这决定了思想在文化中的连续性。分析了俄罗斯人民以自我牺牲为代价保卫祖国形象形成的历时性差异。“人”这个概念在不同历史时期的意义及其在不断变化的社会背景下的折射是有问题的。在这方面,精神上的不变是固定的,它在从普希金到今天的文化中保持着它的作用。基于B. Okudzhava的诗歌文本,解决了和平主义,拒绝战争和保卫祖国之间的矛盾,作为一种拯救“土地”免受普遍邪恶的方式,这与任何特定国家无关,得到了证实。已经确定的是,L.托尔斯泰以蜂群的形象隐喻了人民的捍卫者——以一种动态的品质,而B.奥库扎娃以一棵像树一样“生长”到地面的整体植物形态形式呈现了同样的想法。事实证明,俄罗斯是在其自然权利中被描绘出来的,而保护栖息地免受暴力入侵的自然权利决定了俄罗斯的人道主义形象。在这些作者的作品中强调了否认侵略的全人类的悲情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emanation of L. Tolstoy’s “folk thought” in the work of B. Okudzhava
The issue of the axiological role of Russian literature in creating the humanitarian image of Russia is focused. Attention is focused on the seeming incompatibility of pacifist views and positions of the unconditional need to defend the Motherland in the Patriotic Wars. The positions of L. Tolstoy and B. Okudzhava on this issue are compared in the light of the concept of the synthetic theory of P.N. Sakulin, which determines the continuity of ideas in culture. The diachronic differences in the formation of the image of the Russian people as a defender of their land at the cost of self-sacrifice are analyzed. The meaning of the concept of “people” in different periods of historical time and its refraction in a changing social context are problematized. In this regard, a spiritual invariant is fixed, which retains its role in culture from A.S. Pushkin to the present day. Based on the texts of B. Okudzhava’s poems, the solution of the contradictions between pacifism, the rejection of war and the defense of the fatherland as a modus of saving the “land” from universal evil, which is not tied to any particular nation, is substantiated. It has been established that L. Tolstoy metaphorizes the people-defender in the image of a bee swarm – in a dynamic quality, while B. Okudzhava presents the same idea in a monolithic-phytomorphic form of a tree-like “growing” into the ground. It is proved that Russia is depicted in its natural right, and the natural right to protect the habitat from violent invasion determines the humanitarian image of Russia. The all-human pathos of denial of aggression in the work of these authors is emphasized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信