2型糖尿病患者种植体生存期:放置至36个月

Harold F. Morris, Shigeru Ochi, Sheldon Winkler
{"title":"2型糖尿病患者种植体生存期:放置至36个月","authors":"Harold F. Morris,&nbsp;Shigeru Ochi,&nbsp;Sheldon Winkler","doi":"10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background:</b> Because the life expectancy of individuals continues to increase, dentists providing dental implant treatment can expect to see an increasing number of patients with diabetes mellitus. Today, there are little data available concerning the clinical outcomes involving the use of implant treatment for patients with diabetes mellitus. There are three types of diabetes mellitus: Type 1 (insulin dependent), Type 2 (non-insulin dependent), and gestational. Because of possible complications from patients with diabetes mellitus, they are excluded from participation in most clinical studies of endosseous dental implant survival.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> This study attempted to determine if Type 2 diabetes represents a significant risk factor to the long-term clinical performance of dental implants, using the comprehensive DICRG database. Diabetes was a possible exclusion criterion; however, the final decision on Type 2 patients was left to the dental implant team at the research center. A total of 2,887 implants (663 patients) were surgically placed, restored, and followed for a period of 36 months. Of these, 2,632 (91%) implants were placed in nondiabetic patients and 255 (8.8%) in Type 2 patients. Failures (survival) were compared using descriptive data. Possible clustering was also studied.</p><p><b>Results:</b> A model assuming independence showed that implants in Type 2 patients have significantly more failures (P = 0.020). However, if correlations among implants within the patient are considered, the significance level becomes marginal (P = 0.046). The experience of the surgeon did not produce a clinically significant improvement in implant survival. The use of chlorhexidine rinses following implant placement resulted in a slight improvement (2.5%) in survival in non-Type 2 patients and a greater improvement in Type 2 patients (9.1%); the use of preoperative antibiotics improved survival by 4.5% in non-Type 2 patients and 10.5% in Type 2 patients. The use of HA-coated implants improved survival by 13.2% in Type 2 diabetics.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Type 2 diabetic patients tend to have more failures than non-diabetic patients; however, the influence was marginally significant. These findings need to be confirmed by other scientific clinical studies with a larger Type 2 diabetic sample size.<i>Ann Periodontol 2000;5:157-165.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":79473,"journal":{"name":"Annals of periodontology","volume":"5 1","pages":"157-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.157","citationCount":"233","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implant Survival in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Placement to 36 Months\",\"authors\":\"Harold F. Morris,&nbsp;Shigeru Ochi,&nbsp;Sheldon Winkler\",\"doi\":\"10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Background:</b> Because the life expectancy of individuals continues to increase, dentists providing dental implant treatment can expect to see an increasing number of patients with diabetes mellitus. Today, there are little data available concerning the clinical outcomes involving the use of implant treatment for patients with diabetes mellitus. There are three types of diabetes mellitus: Type 1 (insulin dependent), Type 2 (non-insulin dependent), and gestational. Because of possible complications from patients with diabetes mellitus, they are excluded from participation in most clinical studies of endosseous dental implant survival.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> This study attempted to determine if Type 2 diabetes represents a significant risk factor to the long-term clinical performance of dental implants, using the comprehensive DICRG database. Diabetes was a possible exclusion criterion; however, the final decision on Type 2 patients was left to the dental implant team at the research center. A total of 2,887 implants (663 patients) were surgically placed, restored, and followed for a period of 36 months. Of these, 2,632 (91%) implants were placed in nondiabetic patients and 255 (8.8%) in Type 2 patients. Failures (survival) were compared using descriptive data. Possible clustering was also studied.</p><p><b>Results:</b> A model assuming independence showed that implants in Type 2 patients have significantly more failures (P = 0.020). However, if correlations among implants within the patient are considered, the significance level becomes marginal (P = 0.046). The experience of the surgeon did not produce a clinically significant improvement in implant survival. The use of chlorhexidine rinses following implant placement resulted in a slight improvement (2.5%) in survival in non-Type 2 patients and a greater improvement in Type 2 patients (9.1%); the use of preoperative antibiotics improved survival by 4.5% in non-Type 2 patients and 10.5% in Type 2 patients. The use of HA-coated implants improved survival by 13.2% in Type 2 diabetics.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Type 2 diabetic patients tend to have more failures than non-diabetic patients; however, the influence was marginally significant. These findings need to be confirmed by other scientific clinical studies with a larger Type 2 diabetic sample size.<i>Ann Periodontol 2000;5:157-165.</i></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of periodontology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"157-165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.157\",\"citationCount\":\"233\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 233

摘要

背景:由于人的预期寿命持续增加,提供种植牙治疗的牙医可能会看到越来越多的糖尿病患者。目前,关于糖尿病患者使用种植体治疗的临床结果的数据很少。糖尿病有三种类型:1型(胰岛素依赖型)、2型(非胰岛素依赖型)和妊娠期糖尿病。由于糖尿病患者可能出现的并发症,他们被排除在大多数关于种植体存活的临床研究之外。方法:本研究使用综合DICRG数据库,试图确定2型糖尿病是否是影响种植体长期临床表现的重要危险因素。糖尿病是可能的排除标准;但是,2型患者的最终决定权留给了研究中心的植牙组。共有2887个种植体(663名患者)通过手术放置、修复并随访36个月。其中,2,632例(91%)植入非糖尿病患者,255例(8.8%)植入2型糖尿病患者。失败(生存)用描述性数据进行比较。对聚类的可能性也进行了研究。结果:假设独立的模型显示,2型患者种植体失败率明显高于2型患者(P = 0.020)。然而,如果考虑患者内种植体之间的相关性,显著性水平就变得微不足道(P = 0.046)。外科医生的经验并没有对种植体存活率产生临床显著的改善。在植入后使用氯己定冲洗液,非2型患者的生存率略有改善(2.5%),2型患者的生存率有较大改善(9.1%);术前使用抗生素可使非2型患者的生存率提高4.5%,2型患者的生存率提高10.5%。使用ha包被植入物可使2型糖尿病患者的生存率提高13.2%。结论:2型糖尿病患者比非糖尿病患者更容易出现失败;然而,这种影响是轻微显著的。这些发现需要通过其他更大的2型糖尿病样本量的科学临床研究来证实。牙周病杂志2000;5:157-165。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implant Survival in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Placement to 36 Months

Background: Because the life expectancy of individuals continues to increase, dentists providing dental implant treatment can expect to see an increasing number of patients with diabetes mellitus. Today, there are little data available concerning the clinical outcomes involving the use of implant treatment for patients with diabetes mellitus. There are three types of diabetes mellitus: Type 1 (insulin dependent), Type 2 (non-insulin dependent), and gestational. Because of possible complications from patients with diabetes mellitus, they are excluded from participation in most clinical studies of endosseous dental implant survival.

Methods: This study attempted to determine if Type 2 diabetes represents a significant risk factor to the long-term clinical performance of dental implants, using the comprehensive DICRG database. Diabetes was a possible exclusion criterion; however, the final decision on Type 2 patients was left to the dental implant team at the research center. A total of 2,887 implants (663 patients) were surgically placed, restored, and followed for a period of 36 months. Of these, 2,632 (91%) implants were placed in nondiabetic patients and 255 (8.8%) in Type 2 patients. Failures (survival) were compared using descriptive data. Possible clustering was also studied.

Results: A model assuming independence showed that implants in Type 2 patients have significantly more failures (P = 0.020). However, if correlations among implants within the patient are considered, the significance level becomes marginal (P = 0.046). The experience of the surgeon did not produce a clinically significant improvement in implant survival. The use of chlorhexidine rinses following implant placement resulted in a slight improvement (2.5%) in survival in non-Type 2 patients and a greater improvement in Type 2 patients (9.1%); the use of preoperative antibiotics improved survival by 4.5% in non-Type 2 patients and 10.5% in Type 2 patients. The use of HA-coated implants improved survival by 13.2% in Type 2 diabetics.

Conclusion: Type 2 diabetic patients tend to have more failures than non-diabetic patients; however, the influence was marginally significant. These findings need to be confirmed by other scientific clinical studies with a larger Type 2 diabetic sample size.Ann Periodontol 2000;5:157-165.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信