根状牙内种植体放置后36个月种植体表面涂层和骨质量相关的生存结果

Richard S. Truhlar, Harold F. Morris, Shigeru Ochi
{"title":"根状牙内种植体放置后36个月种植体表面涂层和骨质量相关的生存结果","authors":"Richard S. Truhlar,&nbsp;Harold F. Morris,&nbsp;Shigeru Ochi","doi":"10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Survival rates from placement to 36 months were reported for the ongoing Dental Implant Clinical Research Group studies of root-form endosseous dental implants. Failure rates for all implants were similar in bone qualities 1 and 2 (6.2% and 6.7%, respectively) and slightly higher in bone qualities 3 and 4 (8.5% and 8.7%, respectively). Hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants had an overall failure rate of 3.9% over 36 months in all bone qualities combined, while non-coated implants had a 13.4% failure rate for the same parameters. For each bone quality, there was a significant difference in implant survival for the non-coated implants (<i>P</i> &lt;0.01). The highest failure rates for non-coated implants were in bone qualities 3 and 4 (19.1% and 25.5%, respectively). No major difference in survival was found for HA-coated implants placed in each bone quality. Possible reasons for the differences in survival are discussed. <i>Ann Periodontol 2000;5:109-118.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":79473,"journal":{"name":"Annals of periodontology","volume":"5 1","pages":"109-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.109","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implant Surface Coating and Bone Quality-Related Survival Outcomes Through 36 Months Post-Placement of Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants\",\"authors\":\"Richard S. Truhlar,&nbsp;Harold F. Morris,&nbsp;Shigeru Ochi\",\"doi\":\"10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Survival rates from placement to 36 months were reported for the ongoing Dental Implant Clinical Research Group studies of root-form endosseous dental implants. Failure rates for all implants were similar in bone qualities 1 and 2 (6.2% and 6.7%, respectively) and slightly higher in bone qualities 3 and 4 (8.5% and 8.7%, respectively). Hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants had an overall failure rate of 3.9% over 36 months in all bone qualities combined, while non-coated implants had a 13.4% failure rate for the same parameters. For each bone quality, there was a significant difference in implant survival for the non-coated implants (<i>P</i> &lt;0.01). The highest failure rates for non-coated implants were in bone qualities 3 and 4 (19.1% and 25.5%, respectively). No major difference in survival was found for HA-coated implants placed in each bone quality. Possible reasons for the differences in survival are discussed. <i>Ann Periodontol 2000;5:109-118.</i></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of periodontology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"109-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.109\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

正在进行的牙种植临床研究小组对根状内腔牙种植体的研究报告了从放置到36个月的存活率。所有种植体在骨质量1和2上的失败率相似(分别为6.2%和6.7%),在骨质量3和4上的失败率略高(分别为8.5%和8.7%)。羟基磷灰石(HA)包被种植体在36个月内的所有骨质量综合失败率为3.9%,而非包被种植体在相同参数下的失败率为13.4%。对于不同的骨质量,无涂层种植体的种植体存活率有显著差异(P <0.01)。无涂层种植体失败率最高的是骨质量3和4(分别为19.1%和25.5%)。不同骨质量的ha包被种植体的存活率无显著差异。并讨论了造成存活率差异的可能原因。Ann periodontoto2000,5:109-118。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implant Surface Coating and Bone Quality-Related Survival Outcomes Through 36 Months Post-Placement of Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants

Survival rates from placement to 36 months were reported for the ongoing Dental Implant Clinical Research Group studies of root-form endosseous dental implants. Failure rates for all implants were similar in bone qualities 1 and 2 (6.2% and 6.7%, respectively) and slightly higher in bone qualities 3 and 4 (8.5% and 8.7%, respectively). Hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants had an overall failure rate of 3.9% over 36 months in all bone qualities combined, while non-coated implants had a 13.4% failure rate for the same parameters. For each bone quality, there was a significant difference in implant survival for the non-coated implants (P <0.01). The highest failure rates for non-coated implants were in bone qualities 3 and 4 (19.1% and 25.5%, respectively). No major difference in survival was found for HA-coated implants placed in each bone quality. Possible reasons for the differences in survival are discussed. Ann Periodontol 2000;5:109-118.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信