各种种植体支持的假体设计在36个月的临床功能后的存活率

Arthur M. Rodriguez, Ira H. Orenstein, Harold F. Morris, Shigeru Ochi
{"title":"各种种植体支持的假体设计在36个月的临床功能后的存活率","authors":"Arthur M. Rodriguez,&nbsp;Ira H. Orenstein,&nbsp;Harold F. Morris,&nbsp;Shigeru Ochi","doi":"10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background:</b> The use of endosseous dental implants to replace natural teeth lost to trauma, dental caries, or periodontal disease has become a predictable form of prosthetic treatment since gaining popularity in the early 1980s. While numerous clinical studies have focused on the survival of implants, few address the survival of different prosthesis designs.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Beginning in 1991, 882 prostheses supported by more than 2,900 implants (687 patients) were placed by the Department of Veterans Affairs Dental Implant Clinical Research Group (DICRG). These prostheses were divided into five research strata based on arch location. The recommended design for each stratum was: bar-supported overdenture (maxillary completely edentulous); screw-retained hybrid denture (mandibular completely edentulous); screw-retained fixed partial denture (mandibular and maxillary posterior partially edentulous); and cemented single crown (maxillary anterior single tooth). Alternative overdenture designs were utilized in the edentulous arches when the recommended prosthesis could not be fabricated. Prosthesis success rates for the research strata were calculated for an observation time of up to 36 months following prosthesis placement.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Success rates for the maxillary edentulous stratum ranged from 94.6% for the bar-retained overdenture supported by five to six fixtures to 81.8% for the cap-retained overdenture. The mandibular edentulous strata produced success rates of 98.1% for the fixed hybrid prosthesis to 91.7% for the cap-retained prosthesis. Success rates for maxillary and mandibular posterior fixed partial dentures were 94.3% and 92.6%, respectively, while the maxillary anterior single-tooth prosthesis yielded a success rate of 98.1% for the 36-month observation period.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The recommended prosthesis designs investigated in this study proved to be reliable, with encouraging success rates for an observation period of 36 months following placement. <i>Ann Periodontol 2000;5:101-108.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":79473,"journal":{"name":"Annals of periodontology","volume":"5 1","pages":"101-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.101","citationCount":"65","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival of Various Implant-Supported Prosthesis Designs Following 36 Months of Clinical Function\",\"authors\":\"Arthur M. Rodriguez,&nbsp;Ira H. Orenstein,&nbsp;Harold F. Morris,&nbsp;Shigeru Ochi\",\"doi\":\"10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Background:</b> The use of endosseous dental implants to replace natural teeth lost to trauma, dental caries, or periodontal disease has become a predictable form of prosthetic treatment since gaining popularity in the early 1980s. While numerous clinical studies have focused on the survival of implants, few address the survival of different prosthesis designs.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Beginning in 1991, 882 prostheses supported by more than 2,900 implants (687 patients) were placed by the Department of Veterans Affairs Dental Implant Clinical Research Group (DICRG). These prostheses were divided into five research strata based on arch location. The recommended design for each stratum was: bar-supported overdenture (maxillary completely edentulous); screw-retained hybrid denture (mandibular completely edentulous); screw-retained fixed partial denture (mandibular and maxillary posterior partially edentulous); and cemented single crown (maxillary anterior single tooth). Alternative overdenture designs were utilized in the edentulous arches when the recommended prosthesis could not be fabricated. Prosthesis success rates for the research strata were calculated for an observation time of up to 36 months following prosthesis placement.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Success rates for the maxillary edentulous stratum ranged from 94.6% for the bar-retained overdenture supported by five to six fixtures to 81.8% for the cap-retained overdenture. The mandibular edentulous strata produced success rates of 98.1% for the fixed hybrid prosthesis to 91.7% for the cap-retained prosthesis. Success rates for maxillary and mandibular posterior fixed partial dentures were 94.3% and 92.6%, respectively, while the maxillary anterior single-tooth prosthesis yielded a success rate of 98.1% for the 36-month observation period.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The recommended prosthesis designs investigated in this study proved to be reliable, with encouraging success rates for an observation period of 36 months following placement. <i>Ann Periodontol 2000;5:101-108.</i></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of periodontology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"101-108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.101\",\"citationCount\":\"65\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

摘要

背景:自20世纪80年代初普及以来,使用内腔种植体替代因外伤、龋齿或牙周病而失去的天然牙齿已成为一种可预测的修复治疗形式。虽然许多临床研究都集中在种植体的存活上,但很少涉及不同假体设计的存活。方法:1991年起,退伍军人事务部种植体临床研究小组(DICRG)对687例患者(2900多颗种植体)的882颗种植体进行了修复。这些假体根据弓的位置分为5个研究层。各层推荐设计为:杆支覆盖义齿(上颌全无牙);螺钉保留混合型义齿(下颌全无牙);螺钉保留固定部分义齿(下颌、上颌后牙部分无牙);单牙冠(上颌前牙单牙)。当推荐的义齿无法制作时,在无牙弓中使用替代的覆盖义齿设计。在假体放置后长达36个月的观察时间内,计算研究层的假体成功率。结果:上颌无牙层的修复成功率从5 ~ 6个固定体的棒固位覆盖义齿的94.6%到帽固位覆盖义齿的81.8%不等。下颌无牙层固定混合假体的成功率为98.1%,保留假体的成功率为91.7%。在36个月的观察期内,上颌和下颌后牙固定局部义齿的成功率分别为94.3%和92.6%,上颌前牙单牙义齿的成功率为98.1%。结论:本研究推荐的假体设计被证明是可靠的,在放置后36个月的观察期内成功率令人鼓舞。牙周病杂志2000;5:101-108。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survival of Various Implant-Supported Prosthesis Designs Following 36 Months of Clinical Function

Background: The use of endosseous dental implants to replace natural teeth lost to trauma, dental caries, or periodontal disease has become a predictable form of prosthetic treatment since gaining popularity in the early 1980s. While numerous clinical studies have focused on the survival of implants, few address the survival of different prosthesis designs.

Methods: Beginning in 1991, 882 prostheses supported by more than 2,900 implants (687 patients) were placed by the Department of Veterans Affairs Dental Implant Clinical Research Group (DICRG). These prostheses were divided into five research strata based on arch location. The recommended design for each stratum was: bar-supported overdenture (maxillary completely edentulous); screw-retained hybrid denture (mandibular completely edentulous); screw-retained fixed partial denture (mandibular and maxillary posterior partially edentulous); and cemented single crown (maxillary anterior single tooth). Alternative overdenture designs were utilized in the edentulous arches when the recommended prosthesis could not be fabricated. Prosthesis success rates for the research strata were calculated for an observation time of up to 36 months following prosthesis placement.

Results: Success rates for the maxillary edentulous stratum ranged from 94.6% for the bar-retained overdenture supported by five to six fixtures to 81.8% for the cap-retained overdenture. The mandibular edentulous strata produced success rates of 98.1% for the fixed hybrid prosthesis to 91.7% for the cap-retained prosthesis. Success rates for maxillary and mandibular posterior fixed partial dentures were 94.3% and 92.6%, respectively, while the maxillary anterior single-tooth prosthesis yielded a success rate of 98.1% for the 36-month observation period.

Conclusions: The recommended prosthesis designs investigated in this study proved to be reliable, with encouraging success rates for an observation period of 36 months following placement. Ann Periodontol 2000;5:101-108.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信