{"title":"弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的竞争治疗和一线治疗的未来SOC","authors":"T. Allen, G. Razavi, Nepton Sheik Khoni, N. Basha","doi":"10.21767/2254-6081.100171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the most common type of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) in developed world, so far and approximately 60,000 new non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) cases and 20,000 deaths have been estimated in the United States for 2010. In spite of novel therapeutic options have been suggested and successfully tried in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders, the standard first- line treatment for DLBCL has remained the same combination of chemotherapy and CD20 (activated-glycosylated phosphoprotein) targeting monoclonal antibody rituximab (R) with 30% to 40% chance of relapse after first line R-CHOP treatment. Several clinical trials have been designed to evaluate safety, efficacy and superior clinical benefit by adding novel agents, intensifying cycles of treatment or substituting rituximab with new CD20 targeting immunotherapies. Intensification of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy from 3- week interval cycles to 2- week interval cycles has already shown clinical benefit in a German trial but failed to show improved overall and disease free (DFS1) survival in both elderly (60 to 80 years) and young patients in randomized phase 3 clinical trials. Namely, in a phase 2 randomized clinical trials (PYRAMID) as a first line treatment for non- Germinal Center Cell (GCB) subtype of DLBCL the results were in favor of R-CHOP and adding bortezomib was not found to improve DFS and OS significantly. Immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide is another attractive therapeutic option for non-GCB subtype of DLBCL. Statistically significant difference between non-GCB and GCB controls treated with standard R-CHOP alone in terms of progression-free survival (28% vs. 64%; P = 0.00029) and overall survival (46% vs. 74%; P = 0.000036) was reported while non-GCB and GCB treated with R-CHOP plus lenalidomide had similar rates of progression (60% vs. 59%; P = 0.83) and overall survival at 2 years (83% vs. 75%; P = 0.61). Despite these promising clinical results, further clinical studies, especially phase 3 randomized clinical trials are required to confirm the alternate competitive treatment for DLBCL patients.","PeriodicalId":91204,"journal":{"name":"Archives in cancer research","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21767/2254-6081.100171","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competitive Treatment in Diffuse LargeB-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and theFuture SOC for the First Line Therapy\",\"authors\":\"T. Allen, G. Razavi, Nepton Sheik Khoni, N. Basha\",\"doi\":\"10.21767/2254-6081.100171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the most common type of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) in developed world, so far and approximately 60,000 new non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) cases and 20,000 deaths have been estimated in the United States for 2010. In spite of novel therapeutic options have been suggested and successfully tried in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders, the standard first- line treatment for DLBCL has remained the same combination of chemotherapy and CD20 (activated-glycosylated phosphoprotein) targeting monoclonal antibody rituximab (R) with 30% to 40% chance of relapse after first line R-CHOP treatment. Several clinical trials have been designed to evaluate safety, efficacy and superior clinical benefit by adding novel agents, intensifying cycles of treatment or substituting rituximab with new CD20 targeting immunotherapies. Intensification of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy from 3- week interval cycles to 2- week interval cycles has already shown clinical benefit in a German trial but failed to show improved overall and disease free (DFS1) survival in both elderly (60 to 80 years) and young patients in randomized phase 3 clinical trials. Namely, in a phase 2 randomized clinical trials (PYRAMID) as a first line treatment for non- Germinal Center Cell (GCB) subtype of DLBCL the results were in favor of R-CHOP and adding bortezomib was not found to improve DFS and OS significantly. Immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide is another attractive therapeutic option for non-GCB subtype of DLBCL. Statistically significant difference between non-GCB and GCB controls treated with standard R-CHOP alone in terms of progression-free survival (28% vs. 64%; P = 0.00029) and overall survival (46% vs. 74%; P = 0.000036) was reported while non-GCB and GCB treated with R-CHOP plus lenalidomide had similar rates of progression (60% vs. 59%; P = 0.83) and overall survival at 2 years (83% vs. 75%; P = 0.61). Despite these promising clinical results, further clinical studies, especially phase 3 randomized clinical trials are required to confirm the alternate competitive treatment for DLBCL patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives in cancer research\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21767/2254-6081.100171\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives in cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21767/2254-6081.100171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives in cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21767/2254-6081.100171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)是发达国家最常见的非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)类型,到目前为止,2010年美国估计约有60,000例新发非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)病例和20,000例死亡。尽管在淋巴细胞增生性疾病患者中已经提出并成功尝试了新的治疗方案,但DLBCL的标准一线治疗仍然是化疗和靶向CD20(活化糖基化磷酸化蛋白)的单克隆抗体利妥昔单抗(R)的联合治疗,一线R- chop治疗后复发的几率为30%至40%。一些临床试验旨在通过添加新药物、强化治疗周期或用新的CD20靶向免疫疗法替代利妥昔单抗来评估安全性、有效性和卓越的临床获益。在德国的一项试验中,将环磷酰胺、阿霉素、vincristine、泼尼松(CHOP)化疗从3周间隔周期强化到2周间隔周期已经显示出临床益处,但在随机3期临床试验中,老年(60至80岁)和年轻患者的总生存率和无病生存率(DFS1)均未得到改善。也就是说,在一项2期随机临床试验(PYRAMID)中,作为非生发中心细胞(GCB)亚型DLBCL的一线治疗,结果支持R-CHOP,并没有发现添加硼替佐米能显著改善DFS和OS。免疫调节剂来那度胺是非gcb亚型DLBCL的另一个有吸引力的治疗选择。在无进展生存率方面,单独接受标准R-CHOP治疗的非GCB和GCB对照组有统计学显著差异(28% vs 64%;P = 0.00029)和总生存率(46% vs. 74%;P = 0.000036),而非GCB和GCB用R-CHOP加来那度胺治疗的进展率相似(60% vs 59%;P = 0.83)和2年总生存率(83% vs. 75%;P = 0.61)。尽管这些有希望的临床结果,但需要进一步的临床研究,特别是3期随机临床试验来确认替代竞争性治疗对DLBCL患者的作用。
Competitive Treatment in Diffuse LargeB-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and theFuture SOC for the First Line Therapy
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the most common type of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) in developed world, so far and approximately 60,000 new non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) cases and 20,000 deaths have been estimated in the United States for 2010. In spite of novel therapeutic options have been suggested and successfully tried in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders, the standard first- line treatment for DLBCL has remained the same combination of chemotherapy and CD20 (activated-glycosylated phosphoprotein) targeting monoclonal antibody rituximab (R) with 30% to 40% chance of relapse after first line R-CHOP treatment. Several clinical trials have been designed to evaluate safety, efficacy and superior clinical benefit by adding novel agents, intensifying cycles of treatment or substituting rituximab with new CD20 targeting immunotherapies. Intensification of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy from 3- week interval cycles to 2- week interval cycles has already shown clinical benefit in a German trial but failed to show improved overall and disease free (DFS1) survival in both elderly (60 to 80 years) and young patients in randomized phase 3 clinical trials. Namely, in a phase 2 randomized clinical trials (PYRAMID) as a first line treatment for non- Germinal Center Cell (GCB) subtype of DLBCL the results were in favor of R-CHOP and adding bortezomib was not found to improve DFS and OS significantly. Immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide is another attractive therapeutic option for non-GCB subtype of DLBCL. Statistically significant difference between non-GCB and GCB controls treated with standard R-CHOP alone in terms of progression-free survival (28% vs. 64%; P = 0.00029) and overall survival (46% vs. 74%; P = 0.000036) was reported while non-GCB and GCB treated with R-CHOP plus lenalidomide had similar rates of progression (60% vs. 59%; P = 0.83) and overall survival at 2 years (83% vs. 75%; P = 0.61). Despite these promising clinical results, further clinical studies, especially phase 3 randomized clinical trials are required to confirm the alternate competitive treatment for DLBCL patients.