获取有关实验动物的公共信息:法律和伦理

IF 0.4 4区 农林科学 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES
A. Dzikowski
{"title":"获取有关实验动物的公共信息:法律和伦理","authors":"A. Dzikowski","doi":"10.21521/mw.6798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Normative regulations concerning the use of animals in experiments and education raise numerous controversies and much social discussion. One of the aspects of implementing this form of social activity is the use of constitutional, subjective right of access to public information. Competent public administration authorities, and administrative courts encounter numerous difficulties related to requests for information. Attempts to assess, evaluate, and verify whether the applicants’ goals and intentions are consistent with the axiological premises of the statutory norms occur. The study reveals veterinary, legal, and moral aspects of requests for access to public information related to the use of animals in testing and teaching procedures. The controversial concept of abuse/misuse of the subjective right to access information is presented in a critical, multifaceted way. Obligations of professional ethics of veterinary surgeons concerning laboratory animals and public information related to them are discussed. The effectiveness and consistency of normative regulations are assessed. Interpretational postulates are indicated.","PeriodicalId":49017,"journal":{"name":"Medycyna Weterynaryjna-Veterinary Medicine-Science and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to public information regarding laboratory animals: law and ethics\",\"authors\":\"A. Dzikowski\",\"doi\":\"10.21521/mw.6798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Normative regulations concerning the use of animals in experiments and education raise numerous controversies and much social discussion. One of the aspects of implementing this form of social activity is the use of constitutional, subjective right of access to public information. Competent public administration authorities, and administrative courts encounter numerous difficulties related to requests for information. Attempts to assess, evaluate, and verify whether the applicants’ goals and intentions are consistent with the axiological premises of the statutory norms occur. The study reveals veterinary, legal, and moral aspects of requests for access to public information related to the use of animals in testing and teaching procedures. The controversial concept of abuse/misuse of the subjective right to access information is presented in a critical, multifaceted way. Obligations of professional ethics of veterinary surgeons concerning laboratory animals and public information related to them are discussed. The effectiveness and consistency of normative regulations are assessed. Interpretational postulates are indicated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medycyna Weterynaryjna-Veterinary Medicine-Science and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medycyna Weterynaryjna-Veterinary Medicine-Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21521/mw.6798\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medycyna Weterynaryjna-Veterinary Medicine-Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21521/mw.6798","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于在实验和教育中使用动物的规范性规定引起了许多争议和许多社会讨论。实施这种社会活动形式的一个方面是利用宪法规定的获取公共信息的主观权利。主管公共行政当局和行政法院在要求提供资料方面遇到许多困难。试图评估、评价和验证申请人的目标和意图是否与法定规范的价值论前提一致。该研究揭示了获取有关在试验和教学过程中使用动物的公共信息的请求的兽医、法律和道德方面的问题。滥用/误用获取信息的主观权利这一有争议的概念以一种关键的、多方面的方式提出。讨论了兽医对实验动物的职业道德义务以及与实验动物相关的公共信息。评估规范性法规的有效性和一致性。说明了解释性假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Access to public information regarding laboratory animals: law and ethics
Normative regulations concerning the use of animals in experiments and education raise numerous controversies and much social discussion. One of the aspects of implementing this form of social activity is the use of constitutional, subjective right of access to public information. Competent public administration authorities, and administrative courts encounter numerous difficulties related to requests for information. Attempts to assess, evaluate, and verify whether the applicants’ goals and intentions are consistent with the axiological premises of the statutory norms occur. The study reveals veterinary, legal, and moral aspects of requests for access to public information related to the use of animals in testing and teaching procedures. The controversial concept of abuse/misuse of the subjective right to access information is presented in a critical, multifaceted way. Obligations of professional ethics of veterinary surgeons concerning laboratory animals and public information related to them are discussed. The effectiveness and consistency of normative regulations are assessed. Interpretational postulates are indicated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: "Medycyna Weterynaryjna" publishes various types of articles which are grouped in the following editorial categories: reviews, original studies, scientific and professional problems, the history of veterinary medicine, posthumous memoirs, as well as chronicles that briefly relate scientific advances and developments in the veterinary profession and medicine. The most important are the first two categories, which are published with short summaries in English. Moreover, from 2001 the editors of "Medycyna Weterynaryjna", bearing in mind market demands, has also started publishing entire works in English. Since 2008 the periodical has appeared in an electronic version. The following are available in this version: summaries of studies published from 1999 to 2005, full versions of all the studies published in the years 2006-2011 (in pdf files), and full versions of the English studies published in the current year (pdf). Only summaries of the remaining studies from the current year are available. In accordance with the principles accepted by the editors, the full versions of these texts will not be made available until next year. All articles are evaluated twice by leading Polish scientists and professionals before they are considered for publication. For years now "Medycyna Weterynaryjna" has maintained a high standard thanks to this system. The review articles are actually succinct monographs dealing with specific scientific and professional problems that are based on the most recent findings. Original works have a particular value, since they present research carried out in Polish and international scientific centers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信