共享智慧:神学院哲学家与哲学实践者的对话

Ofm Vaughn Jérôme Fayle
{"title":"共享智慧:神学院哲学家与哲学实践者的对话","authors":"Ofm Vaughn Jérôme Fayle","doi":"10.17688/ntr.v28i1.1175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The world of seminary philosophy studies and that of the philosophical practitioner seem, at first, irreconcilably divergent: the first couched in a medieval religious institution of higher learning, the other working as a nondenominational independent agent. Both, however, use the skills of philosophy to assist individuals and groups in finding intellectually coherent and valuable relationships with themselves, others, and society at large. This article gives the context for the study of philosophy in the seminary and argues that, with five shared philosophical competencies, philosophical practitioners and seminary students have a basis for shared interests and future mutual concerns, potentially beneficial to both worlds.","PeriodicalId":82116,"journal":{"name":"New theology review","volume":"28 1","pages":"53-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shared Wisdom: Seminary Philosophers and Philosophical Practitioners in Dialogue\",\"authors\":\"Ofm Vaughn Jérôme Fayle\",\"doi\":\"10.17688/ntr.v28i1.1175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The world of seminary philosophy studies and that of the philosophical practitioner seem, at first, irreconcilably divergent: the first couched in a medieval religious institution of higher learning, the other working as a nondenominational independent agent. Both, however, use the skills of philosophy to assist individuals and groups in finding intellectually coherent and valuable relationships with themselves, others, and society at large. This article gives the context for the study of philosophy in the seminary and argues that, with five shared philosophical competencies, philosophical practitioners and seminary students have a basis for shared interests and future mutual concerns, potentially beneficial to both worlds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New theology review\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"53-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New theology review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17688/ntr.v28i1.1175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New theology review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17688/ntr.v28i1.1175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神学院哲学研究的世界和哲学实践者的世界,起初似乎是不可调和的分歧:前者是在中世纪的宗教高等学府中培养出来的,后者是作为一个非宗派的独立主体工作的。然而,两者都使用哲学的技巧来帮助个人和团体找到与自己、他人和整个社会在智力上一致和有价值的关系。本文给出了神学院哲学研究的背景,并认为,有了五种共同的哲学能力,哲学实践者和神学院学生就有了共同兴趣和未来共同关注的基础,这对双方都有潜在的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shared Wisdom: Seminary Philosophers and Philosophical Practitioners in Dialogue
The world of seminary philosophy studies and that of the philosophical practitioner seem, at first, irreconcilably divergent: the first couched in a medieval religious institution of higher learning, the other working as a nondenominational independent agent. Both, however, use the skills of philosophy to assist individuals and groups in finding intellectually coherent and valuable relationships with themselves, others, and society at large. This article gives the context for the study of philosophy in the seminary and argues that, with five shared philosophical competencies, philosophical practitioners and seminary students have a basis for shared interests and future mutual concerns, potentially beneficial to both worlds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信