法医学文献制图:1980 - 2005年北美期刊文献计量学研究

A. Sauvageau, S. Desnoyers, A. Godin
{"title":"法医学文献制图:1980 - 2005年北美期刊文献计量学研究","authors":"A. Sauvageau, S. Desnoyers, A. Godin","doi":"10.2174/1874402800902010041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study was designed to describe the evolution of forensic literature in North-American journals over more than 25 years. From 1980 to 2005, the number of articles per year and the average number of authors per article have both increased almost twofold, while the relative contribution of other countries in comparison to the United States has increased from 19.2% to 61.0%. The contributions to the forensic literature of anthropology and biology/DNA have significantly increased, while the contribution of questioned documents and ballistics decreased. Finally, the number of studies using the scientific method has significantly increased through the years, passing from 10.5% to 40.7%. This better knowledge of our body of literature as a whole could help us assess our strengths and weaknesses, and help us to position ourselves on literature ethical issues.","PeriodicalId":88327,"journal":{"name":"The open forensic science journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"41-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping the Literature in Forensic Sciences: A Bibliometric Study of North-American Journals from 1980 to 2005\",\"authors\":\"A. Sauvageau, S. Desnoyers, A. Godin\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874402800902010041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study was designed to describe the evolution of forensic literature in North-American journals over more than 25 years. From 1980 to 2005, the number of articles per year and the average number of authors per article have both increased almost twofold, while the relative contribution of other countries in comparison to the United States has increased from 19.2% to 61.0%. The contributions to the forensic literature of anthropology and biology/DNA have significantly increased, while the contribution of questioned documents and ballistics decreased. Finally, the number of studies using the scientific method has significantly increased through the years, passing from 10.5% to 40.7%. This better knowledge of our body of literature as a whole could help us assess our strengths and weaknesses, and help us to position ourselves on literature ethical issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open forensic science journal\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"41-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open forensic science journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874402800902010041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open forensic science journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874402800902010041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

本研究旨在描述25年来北美期刊上法医文献的演变。从1980年到2005年,每年的论文数量和平均每篇文章的作者数量都增长了近两倍,而其他国家与美国相比的相对贡献从19.2%增加到61.0%。人类学和生物学/DNA对法医文献的贡献显著增加,而质疑文件和弹道学的贡献减少。最后,使用科学方法的研究数量逐年显著增加,从10.5%增加到40.7%。更好地了解我们的文学整体可以帮助我们评估自己的优势和劣势,并帮助我们在文学伦理问题上定位自己。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping the Literature in Forensic Sciences: A Bibliometric Study of North-American Journals from 1980 to 2005
The present study was designed to describe the evolution of forensic literature in North-American journals over more than 25 years. From 1980 to 2005, the number of articles per year and the average number of authors per article have both increased almost twofold, while the relative contribution of other countries in comparison to the United States has increased from 19.2% to 61.0%. The contributions to the forensic literature of anthropology and biology/DNA have significantly increased, while the contribution of questioned documents and ballistics decreased. Finally, the number of studies using the scientific method has significantly increased through the years, passing from 10.5% to 40.7%. This better knowledge of our body of literature as a whole could help us assess our strengths and weaknesses, and help us to position ourselves on literature ethical issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信