坦桑尼亚姆万扎肺结核患者涂片阴性和培养阳性结果的危险因素

Å. B. Andersen, F. V. Leth, P. Magnussen, Mugomela Apolinary, H. Friis, M. Tanzania
{"title":"坦桑尼亚姆万扎肺结核患者涂片阴性和培养阳性结果的危险因素","authors":"Å. B. Andersen, F. V. Leth, P. Magnussen, Mugomela Apolinary, H. Friis, M. Tanzania","doi":"10.2174/1874315300801010068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Smear negative and culture positive results in pulmonary tuberculosis are not uncommon yet the underlying factors are not well established. Objective: To determine factors associated with smear negative and culture positive results. Methods: Pulmonary tuberculosis patients were consecutively recruited for 12 months from five health facilities in Mwanza region, Tanzania. Sputum examinations were done at the recruitment centre and at the TB reference laboratory using Auramine O technique. Culture was done at the TB reference laboratory using Lowenstein Jensen solid media. A post-hoc analysis compared patients who had a smear negative culture positive result (case) with patients who had not (controls). Results: A total of 655 pulmonary TB patients were recruited, 18 had no culture results and were excluded from the analy- sis. Of the remaining 637 patients, 127 (19.9%) had three negative smears at the recruitment centre and 34 patients were a case. Current smoking was strongly associated with being a case, especially in women. Of the 127 patients who had three negative smears at the recruitment center, 104 (81.9%) also had a negative smear at the reference laboratory. Of these, 13 (12.5%) were still culture positive. Conclusion: The frequencies of smear-negative culture-positive results differ between health facilities, indicating possible difference in quality of laboratory procedures. Strengthening of laboratory capacity is needed both for optimizing smear microscopy techniques, and for performing sputum cultures for diagnosing TB when there is a high rate of suspicion. The association between smoking and smear negative culture positive TB needs to be assessed in adequately large studies.","PeriodicalId":88762,"journal":{"name":"The open tropical medicine journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"68-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors for Smear Negative And Culture Positive Results Among Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients in Mwanza, Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Å. B. Andersen, F. V. Leth, P. Magnussen, Mugomela Apolinary, H. Friis, M. Tanzania\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874315300801010068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Smear negative and culture positive results in pulmonary tuberculosis are not uncommon yet the underlying factors are not well established. Objective: To determine factors associated with smear negative and culture positive results. Methods: Pulmonary tuberculosis patients were consecutively recruited for 12 months from five health facilities in Mwanza region, Tanzania. Sputum examinations were done at the recruitment centre and at the TB reference laboratory using Auramine O technique. Culture was done at the TB reference laboratory using Lowenstein Jensen solid media. A post-hoc analysis compared patients who had a smear negative culture positive result (case) with patients who had not (controls). Results: A total of 655 pulmonary TB patients were recruited, 18 had no culture results and were excluded from the analy- sis. Of the remaining 637 patients, 127 (19.9%) had three negative smears at the recruitment centre and 34 patients were a case. Current smoking was strongly associated with being a case, especially in women. Of the 127 patients who had three negative smears at the recruitment center, 104 (81.9%) also had a negative smear at the reference laboratory. Of these, 13 (12.5%) were still culture positive. Conclusion: The frequencies of smear-negative culture-positive results differ between health facilities, indicating possible difference in quality of laboratory procedures. Strengthening of laboratory capacity is needed both for optimizing smear microscopy techniques, and for performing sputum cultures for diagnosing TB when there is a high rate of suspicion. The association between smoking and smear negative culture positive TB needs to be assessed in adequately large studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open tropical medicine journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"68-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open tropical medicine journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874315300801010068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open tropical medicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874315300801010068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:肺结核的涂片阴性和培养阳性结果并不罕见,但潜在的因素尚未很好地确定。目的:探讨影响涂片阴性和培养阳性结果的相关因素。方法:从坦桑尼亚姆万扎地区的五个卫生机构连续招募肺结核患者12个月。在招募中心和结核病参比实验室使用Auramine O技术进行痰液检查。在结核参考实验室使用Lowenstein Jensen固体培养基进行培养。一项事后分析比较了涂片阴性培养阳性结果的患者(病例)和未涂片阴性培养阳性结果的患者(对照组)。结果:共纳入655例肺结核患者,其中18例无培养结果,被排除在分析之外。在剩下的637名患者中,127名(19.9%)在招募中心有三次阴性涂片,34名患者为一例。目前吸烟与发病密切相关,尤其是女性。在招募中心三次涂片阴性的127例患者中,104例(81.9%)在参比实验室也有阴性涂片。其中13例(12.5%)仍为培养阳性。结论:不同卫生机构的涂片阴性培养阳性结果的频率不同,表明实验室程序的质量可能存在差异。需要加强实验室能力,以优化涂片显微镜技术,并在怀疑率很高时进行痰培养以诊断结核病。吸烟与涂片阴性培养阳性结核病之间的关系需要在足够大的研究中进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Factors for Smear Negative And Culture Positive Results Among Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients in Mwanza, Tanzania
Background: Smear negative and culture positive results in pulmonary tuberculosis are not uncommon yet the underlying factors are not well established. Objective: To determine factors associated with smear negative and culture positive results. Methods: Pulmonary tuberculosis patients were consecutively recruited for 12 months from five health facilities in Mwanza region, Tanzania. Sputum examinations were done at the recruitment centre and at the TB reference laboratory using Auramine O technique. Culture was done at the TB reference laboratory using Lowenstein Jensen solid media. A post-hoc analysis compared patients who had a smear negative culture positive result (case) with patients who had not (controls). Results: A total of 655 pulmonary TB patients were recruited, 18 had no culture results and were excluded from the analy- sis. Of the remaining 637 patients, 127 (19.9%) had three negative smears at the recruitment centre and 34 patients were a case. Current smoking was strongly associated with being a case, especially in women. Of the 127 patients who had three negative smears at the recruitment center, 104 (81.9%) also had a negative smear at the reference laboratory. Of these, 13 (12.5%) were still culture positive. Conclusion: The frequencies of smear-negative culture-positive results differ between health facilities, indicating possible difference in quality of laboratory procedures. Strengthening of laboratory capacity is needed both for optimizing smear microscopy techniques, and for performing sputum cultures for diagnosing TB when there is a high rate of suspicion. The association between smoking and smear negative culture positive TB needs to be assessed in adequately large studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信