基于关系的社会工作

Q2 Social Sciences
Courtney Jones
{"title":"基于关系的社会工作","authors":"Courtney Jones","doi":"10.1921/803160107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RELATIONSHIP-BASED SOCIAL WORK Ruch, G., Turney, D, & Ward, A. (eds.) (2010). London: Jessica Kingsley. pp.272 (pbk) £19.99 ISBN 978-184905003-6 This book is a well-structured look at the place of relationships in social work practice and examines the theoretical base as well as the need for training in, supervision of, and reflection on, its use. The opening chapters by Gillian Ruch and Adrian Ward are well-argued and enlightening, locating the theories of relationship-based work in an historical context, and contextualising the discussions that follow. The links to reflective practice are many and offer sound advice to social work students trying to locate 'self-awareness' in social work and, more explicitly, in reflective practice. The editors' discussion of the ambiguous nature of social work, 'Social Work occupies an ambivalent social space' (p. 22), will help the desired 'light-bulb' moment looked for, in my experience of teaching, in this subject area. The book also develops the why's and how's of there being 'no right answer' to service users' problems, and how a sound knowledge of relationships can help with working in 'Schon's (1983) swampy lowlands'. Adrian Ward's note that ? am suggesting that this is more of an art than a science, more a question of growth and development, rather than merely training' (p. 64) sums up, for me, the need for a fluid approach to working from such a perspective. The next section of the book moves into a series of contributor discussions around the place, and use, of relationships in practice. Chapter Four gives clear evidence of how the understanding of relationships can be used in drawing out information from vulnerable service users and disaffected clients. This aspect provides reference to sound transferable practice skills for working in high-risk situations, such as child abuse cases. However, I felt there was a missed opportunity in the lack of discussion of the evidence from research in such situations, which underpins empowering practice when working with involuntary clients. Kohli and Dutton's links to short-term work gives added breadth to the use of relationships in brief work where they may often be seen as less important because of the time-limited nature of the intervention. They additionally draw in and provide an antimanagerial argument applicable to child protection when they note, 'there is a danger that with families on the move colliding with professionals making haste, little is made into too much and that too much is left invisible and compressed into too little' (p. 101). In my view, they draw out culturally-competent practice, although it is not named as such, with diverse ethnic groups, refugees and asylum seekers. Chapters Six, Seven and Eight then move into working with strong feelings and the emotional costs of working with service users whose behaviours can be unexpected and, very often, intimidating. …","PeriodicalId":38894,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Community Justice","volume":"9 1","pages":"154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship-Based Social Work\",\"authors\":\"Courtney Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1921/803160107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"RELATIONSHIP-BASED SOCIAL WORK Ruch, G., Turney, D, & Ward, A. (eds.) (2010). London: Jessica Kingsley. pp.272 (pbk) £19.99 ISBN 978-184905003-6 This book is a well-structured look at the place of relationships in social work practice and examines the theoretical base as well as the need for training in, supervision of, and reflection on, its use. The opening chapters by Gillian Ruch and Adrian Ward are well-argued and enlightening, locating the theories of relationship-based work in an historical context, and contextualising the discussions that follow. The links to reflective practice are many and offer sound advice to social work students trying to locate 'self-awareness' in social work and, more explicitly, in reflective practice. The editors' discussion of the ambiguous nature of social work, 'Social Work occupies an ambivalent social space' (p. 22), will help the desired 'light-bulb' moment looked for, in my experience of teaching, in this subject area. The book also develops the why's and how's of there being 'no right answer' to service users' problems, and how a sound knowledge of relationships can help with working in 'Schon's (1983) swampy lowlands'. Adrian Ward's note that ? am suggesting that this is more of an art than a science, more a question of growth and development, rather than merely training' (p. 64) sums up, for me, the need for a fluid approach to working from such a perspective. The next section of the book moves into a series of contributor discussions around the place, and use, of relationships in practice. Chapter Four gives clear evidence of how the understanding of relationships can be used in drawing out information from vulnerable service users and disaffected clients. This aspect provides reference to sound transferable practice skills for working in high-risk situations, such as child abuse cases. However, I felt there was a missed opportunity in the lack of discussion of the evidence from research in such situations, which underpins empowering practice when working with involuntary clients. Kohli and Dutton's links to short-term work gives added breadth to the use of relationships in brief work where they may often be seen as less important because of the time-limited nature of the intervention. They additionally draw in and provide an antimanagerial argument applicable to child protection when they note, 'there is a danger that with families on the move colliding with professionals making haste, little is made into too much and that too much is left invisible and compressed into too little' (p. 101). In my view, they draw out culturally-competent practice, although it is not named as such, with diverse ethnic groups, refugees and asylum seekers. Chapters Six, Seven and Eight then move into working with strong feelings and the emotional costs of working with service users whose behaviours can be unexpected and, very often, intimidating. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":38894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Community Justice\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Community Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1921/803160107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Community Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1921/803160107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

基于关系的社会工作:Ruch, G, Turney, D, and Ward, A.(编)(2010)。伦敦:杰西卡·金斯利。这本书是一个结构良好的看在社会工作实践的关系的地方,并检查的理论基础,以及需要培训,监督和反思,它的使用。吉莉安·鲁奇(Gillian Ruch)和阿德里安·沃德(Adrian Ward)所著的开篇章节论述得很好,很有启发性,将基于关系的工作理论置于历史背景中,并将随后的讨论置于背景中。与反思性实践的联系很多,并为社会工作学生提供了合理的建议,这些学生试图在社会工作中找到“自我意识”,更明确地说,在反思性实践中。编辑们对社会工作的模棱两可性质的讨论,“社会工作占据了一个矛盾的社会空间”(第22页),将有助于我在这个主题领域的教学经验中所寻找的理想的“灯泡”时刻。这本书还阐述了服务用户的问题“没有正确答案”的原因和方法,以及良好的人际关系知识如何有助于在“Schon(1983)沼泽低地”工作。艾德里安·沃德的笔记?我认为这更像是一门艺术而不是一门科学,更像是一个成长和发展的问题,而不仅仅是训练”(第64页),对我来说,总结了从这种角度出发,需要一种灵活的方法。本书的下一部分将围绕关系在实践中的位置和使用展开一系列贡献者讨论。第四章提供了明确的证据,说明如何利用对关系的理解,从弱势服务使用者和心怀不满的客户那里提取信息。这方面为处理高风险情况(如虐待儿童案件)提供了可靠的可转移实践技能参考。然而,我觉得在这种情况下缺乏对研究证据的讨论是一个错失的机会,这是在与非自愿客户合作时支持授权实践的基础。Kohli和Dutton与短期工作的联系为在短期工作中使用关系提供了更多的广度,在短期工作中,由于干预的时间限制性质,它们通常被视为不那么重要。他们还引用并提供了一个适用于儿童保护的反管理论点,他们指出,“有一种危险,即移动中的家庭与匆忙的专业人员发生冲突,很少变成太多,太多被忽视并压缩成太少”(第101页)。在我看来,它们引出了不同种族群体、难民和寻求庇护者的文化主管实践,尽管没有这样命名。第六章、第七章和第八章接着讨论了与服务用户打交道的强烈情感和情感成本,这些服务用户的行为可能出乎意料,而且经常令人生畏。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationship-Based Social Work
RELATIONSHIP-BASED SOCIAL WORK Ruch, G., Turney, D, & Ward, A. (eds.) (2010). London: Jessica Kingsley. pp.272 (pbk) £19.99 ISBN 978-184905003-6 This book is a well-structured look at the place of relationships in social work practice and examines the theoretical base as well as the need for training in, supervision of, and reflection on, its use. The opening chapters by Gillian Ruch and Adrian Ward are well-argued and enlightening, locating the theories of relationship-based work in an historical context, and contextualising the discussions that follow. The links to reflective practice are many and offer sound advice to social work students trying to locate 'self-awareness' in social work and, more explicitly, in reflective practice. The editors' discussion of the ambiguous nature of social work, 'Social Work occupies an ambivalent social space' (p. 22), will help the desired 'light-bulb' moment looked for, in my experience of teaching, in this subject area. The book also develops the why's and how's of there being 'no right answer' to service users' problems, and how a sound knowledge of relationships can help with working in 'Schon's (1983) swampy lowlands'. Adrian Ward's note that ? am suggesting that this is more of an art than a science, more a question of growth and development, rather than merely training' (p. 64) sums up, for me, the need for a fluid approach to working from such a perspective. The next section of the book moves into a series of contributor discussions around the place, and use, of relationships in practice. Chapter Four gives clear evidence of how the understanding of relationships can be used in drawing out information from vulnerable service users and disaffected clients. This aspect provides reference to sound transferable practice skills for working in high-risk situations, such as child abuse cases. However, I felt there was a missed opportunity in the lack of discussion of the evidence from research in such situations, which underpins empowering practice when working with involuntary clients. Kohli and Dutton's links to short-term work gives added breadth to the use of relationships in brief work where they may often be seen as less important because of the time-limited nature of the intervention. They additionally draw in and provide an antimanagerial argument applicable to child protection when they note, 'there is a danger that with families on the move colliding with professionals making haste, little is made into too much and that too much is left invisible and compressed into too little' (p. 101). In my view, they draw out culturally-competent practice, although it is not named as such, with diverse ethnic groups, refugees and asylum seekers. Chapters Six, Seven and Eight then move into working with strong feelings and the emotional costs of working with service users whose behaviours can be unexpected and, very often, intimidating. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信