灵知,现代性和神圣的化身

Willem Styfhals
{"title":"灵知,现代性和神圣的化身","authors":"Willem Styfhals","doi":"10.2143/BIJ.73.2.2172318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The philosophical reflection about the nature of modernity and modem philosophy is as old as modernity itself. Already in the 17h century, Descartes and his contemporaries wanted to understand the (historical) significance of their innovations in the domains of science and philosophy. They contrasted their philosophical positions with medieval thought and evaluated the modem innovations as the starting point of a radically new way of thinking. In this respect, modernity and enlightenment were initially interpreted very positively. Nevertheless, the critical and negative evaluations do not seem to be much younger than these original optimistic interpretations. Up to today, these questions of interpretation and evaluation of modem thought have played a central role in philosophy and in other related domains. The contemporary modernity debate wants to uncover the modem roots of our contemporary society; it wants to situate our specific ways of thinking and it tries to understand the accomplishments and failures of modernity. A key figure within this contemporary modernity debate is the German philosopher Hans Blumenberg. In his renowned Die Legitimitiit der Neuzeit,3","PeriodicalId":80655,"journal":{"name":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","volume":"73 1","pages":"190 - 211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/BIJ.73.2.2172318","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GNOSIS, MODERNITY AND DIVINE INCARNATION\",\"authors\":\"Willem Styfhals\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/BIJ.73.2.2172318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The philosophical reflection about the nature of modernity and modem philosophy is as old as modernity itself. Already in the 17h century, Descartes and his contemporaries wanted to understand the (historical) significance of their innovations in the domains of science and philosophy. They contrasted their philosophical positions with medieval thought and evaluated the modem innovations as the starting point of a radically new way of thinking. In this respect, modernity and enlightenment were initially interpreted very positively. Nevertheless, the critical and negative evaluations do not seem to be much younger than these original optimistic interpretations. Up to today, these questions of interpretation and evaluation of modem thought have played a central role in philosophy and in other related domains. The contemporary modernity debate wants to uncover the modem roots of our contemporary society; it wants to situate our specific ways of thinking and it tries to understand the accomplishments and failures of modernity. A key figure within this contemporary modernity debate is the German philosopher Hans Blumenberg. In his renowned Die Legitimitiit der Neuzeit,3\",\"PeriodicalId\":80655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"190 - 211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/BIJ.73.2.2172318\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/BIJ.73.2.2172318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/BIJ.73.2.2172318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

关于现代性和现代哲学本质的哲学反思与现代性本身一样古老。早在17世纪,笛卡尔和他的同时代人就想了解他们在科学和哲学领域创新的(历史)意义。他们将自己的哲学立场与中世纪的思想进行了对比,并将现代的创新评价为一种全新思维方式的起点。在这方面,现代性和启蒙运动最初被非常积极地阐释。然而,批评和否定的评价似乎并不比这些最初的乐观解释年轻多少。直到今天,这些解释和评价现代思想的问题在哲学和其他相关领域发挥了核心作用。当代现代性之争要揭示我们当代社会的现代根源;它想要定位我们特定的思维方式,并试图理解现代性的成就和失败。德国哲学家汉斯·布卢门伯格(Hans Blumenberg)是这场当代现代性辩论中的关键人物。在他著名的《新时代的合法性》一书中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
GNOSIS, MODERNITY AND DIVINE INCARNATION
The philosophical reflection about the nature of modernity and modem philosophy is as old as modernity itself. Already in the 17h century, Descartes and his contemporaries wanted to understand the (historical) significance of their innovations in the domains of science and philosophy. They contrasted their philosophical positions with medieval thought and evaluated the modem innovations as the starting point of a radically new way of thinking. In this respect, modernity and enlightenment were initially interpreted very positively. Nevertheless, the critical and negative evaluations do not seem to be much younger than these original optimistic interpretations. Up to today, these questions of interpretation and evaluation of modem thought have played a central role in philosophy and in other related domains. The contemporary modernity debate wants to uncover the modem roots of our contemporary society; it wants to situate our specific ways of thinking and it tries to understand the accomplishments and failures of modernity. A key figure within this contemporary modernity debate is the German philosopher Hans Blumenberg. In his renowned Die Legitimitiit der Neuzeit,3
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信