{"title":"真实性——来自内部的观点","authors":"R. Welten","doi":"10.2143/BIJ.71.2.2051604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this contribution I wish to attempt a radical phenomenological elucidation of the notion of authenticity. In order to elaborate on the highly problematic philosophical idea of authenticity, I will make use of the philosophy of the French philosopher Michel Henry (1922-2002). Although Henry does not make use of the term as such, it is his understanding of the Self as self-affection that makes a real philosophy of authenticity not only possible, but also inevitable. Following this line of thought, I will maintain that Michel Henry's philosophy is a philosophy of authenticity. Since there is, as we shall see, the original experience of the Self, an original experience of life as self-affection, this primal experience appeals us not to renounce our origin. The authentic sphere as described in Henry's works is called Life. I will discuss first Henry's phenomenology as a radicalisation of classical phenomenology, in which the appeal for authenticity is explicit. Then I will focus on Henry's idea of the notion of the Self and how this notion escapes the problem of everlasting selfreference. In the last paragraph I will focus on a possible Henrian comprehension of the authentic life. I will also question the role of Christianity in his later works. Is the Christian life the authentic Life? And if so, what does that imply?","PeriodicalId":80655,"journal":{"name":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","volume":"9 1","pages":"197 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/BIJ.71.2.2051604","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AUTHENTICITY—THE VIEW FROM WITHIN\",\"authors\":\"R. Welten\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/BIJ.71.2.2051604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this contribution I wish to attempt a radical phenomenological elucidation of the notion of authenticity. In order to elaborate on the highly problematic philosophical idea of authenticity, I will make use of the philosophy of the French philosopher Michel Henry (1922-2002). Although Henry does not make use of the term as such, it is his understanding of the Self as self-affection that makes a real philosophy of authenticity not only possible, but also inevitable. Following this line of thought, I will maintain that Michel Henry's philosophy is a philosophy of authenticity. Since there is, as we shall see, the original experience of the Self, an original experience of life as self-affection, this primal experience appeals us not to renounce our origin. The authentic sphere as described in Henry's works is called Life. I will discuss first Henry's phenomenology as a radicalisation of classical phenomenology, in which the appeal for authenticity is explicit. Then I will focus on Henry's idea of the notion of the Self and how this notion escapes the problem of everlasting selfreference. In the last paragraph I will focus on a possible Henrian comprehension of the authentic life. I will also question the role of Christianity in his later works. Is the Christian life the authentic Life? And if so, what does that imply?\",\"PeriodicalId\":80655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"197 - 217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/BIJ.71.2.2051604\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/BIJ.71.2.2051604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/BIJ.71.2.2051604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this contribution I wish to attempt a radical phenomenological elucidation of the notion of authenticity. In order to elaborate on the highly problematic philosophical idea of authenticity, I will make use of the philosophy of the French philosopher Michel Henry (1922-2002). Although Henry does not make use of the term as such, it is his understanding of the Self as self-affection that makes a real philosophy of authenticity not only possible, but also inevitable. Following this line of thought, I will maintain that Michel Henry's philosophy is a philosophy of authenticity. Since there is, as we shall see, the original experience of the Self, an original experience of life as self-affection, this primal experience appeals us not to renounce our origin. The authentic sphere as described in Henry's works is called Life. I will discuss first Henry's phenomenology as a radicalisation of classical phenomenology, in which the appeal for authenticity is explicit. Then I will focus on Henry's idea of the notion of the Self and how this notion escapes the problem of everlasting selfreference. In the last paragraph I will focus on a possible Henrian comprehension of the authentic life. I will also question the role of Christianity in his later works. Is the Christian life the authentic Life? And if so, what does that imply?