关于民族名与民族名理论地位的思考

Q3 Arts and Humanities

Onomastica Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.17651/onomast.65.2.1

R. Coates

{"title":"关于民族名与民族名理论地位的思考","authors":"R. Coates","doi":"10.17651/onomast.65.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I reflect on whether ethnonyms and demonyms can appropriately be considered proper names at all from the semantic perspective, and if so, on what basis. I believe the answer is yes, perhaps unsurprisingly, but there are troublesome conceptual tensions to overcome in the relation between logic and linguistics. Nevertheless an understanding of the difficulties can be constructive, and in this case it lead to a proposal for a terminological innovation that has useful consequences.","PeriodicalId":36198,"journal":{"name":"Onomastica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some thoughts on the theoretical status of ethnonyms and demonyms\",\"authors\":\"R. Coates\",\"doi\":\"10.17651/onomast.65.2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper I reflect on whether ethnonyms and demonyms can appropriately be considered proper names at all from the semantic perspective, and if so, on what basis. I believe the answer is yes, perhaps unsurprisingly, but there are troublesome conceptual tensions to overcome in the relation between logic and linguistics. Nevertheless an understanding of the difficulties can be constructive, and in this case it lead to a proposal for a terminological innovation that has useful consequences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Onomastica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Onomastica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17651/onomast.65.2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onomastica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17651/onomast.65.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从语义学的角度对民族名和恶魔名是否可以被恰当地视为专有名词进行了思考，如果可以，依据是什么。我相信答案是肯定的，这也许并不令人意外，但在逻辑和语言学之间的关系中，有一些棘手的概念紧张需要克服。然而，对困难的理解可能是建设性的，在这种情况下，它会导致对术语创新的建议，从而产生有用的结果。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Some thoughts on the theoretical status of ethnonyms and demonyms

In this paper I reflect on whether ethnonyms and demonyms can appropriately be considered proper names at all from the semantic perspective, and if so, on what basis. I believe the answer is yes, perhaps unsurprisingly, but there are troublesome conceptual tensions to overcome in the relation between logic and linguistics. Nevertheless an understanding of the difficulties can be constructive, and in this case it lead to a proposal for a terminological innovation that has useful consequences.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Onomastica Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

22 weeks