皮埃尔·贝亚德作品中的时间解读

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, ROMANCE
Nicolás Garayalde
{"title":"皮埃尔·贝亚德作品中的时间解读","authors":"Nicolás Garayalde","doi":"10.21071/CED.V14I.10908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEn este articulo ofrecemos una interpretacion de la critica anacronica de Pierre Bayard con el objetivo de indagar la relacion entre el tiempo y la literatura y problematizar el modo en que entendemos la historia literaria. Para ello, analizaremos las estrategias deconstruccionistas desplegadas por el critico frances (como la ironia y la paradoja) que conducen a nociones como plagio por anticipado. Esto nos llevara a una comparacion con otros modos de pensar la historia literaria como los que encontramos en Harold Bloom y Hans-Robert Jauss. Finalmente, nuestro articulo buscara fundamentar la hipotesis segun la cual la problematizacion de la historia literaria conduce a una teoria de la lectura. EnglishThe following article offers an interpretation of Pierre Bayard’s anachronistic criticism in order to look into the relationship between time and literature, and to problematize the way in which we understand literary history. To that end, we will analyze the deconstructionist strategies deployed by the French critic (such as irony and paradox) which lead to notions such as anticipatory plagiarism. This will drive us to a comparison with other manners of thinking literary history, including those we find in Harold Bloom’s and Hans-Robert Jauss’s works. Finally, this article will try to lay the foundation of the hypothesis according to which the questioning of literary history leads to a reading theory. francaisCet article offre une interpretation de la critique anachronique de Pierre Bayard afin d’enqueter la relation entre le temps et la litterature et de problematiser la maniere dont on comprend l’histoire litteraire. Pour ce faire, nous analyserons les strategies deconstructionnistes deployees par le critique francais (comme l’ironie et le paradoxe) qui menent vers des notions telles que le plagiat par anticipation. Cela nous conduira a une comparaison entre les facons de penser l’histoire litteraire chez des auteurs comme Harold Bloom et Hans-Robert Jauss. Finalement, l’article cherchera a poser les bases de l’hypothese selon laquelle la problematisation de l’histoire litteraire conduit a une theorie de la lecture.","PeriodicalId":40938,"journal":{"name":"Cedille-Revista de Estudios Franceses","volume":"14 1","pages":"221-243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La lectura del tiempo en la obra de Pierre Bayard\",\"authors\":\"Nicolás Garayalde\",\"doi\":\"10.21071/CED.V14I.10908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolEn este articulo ofrecemos una interpretacion de la critica anacronica de Pierre Bayard con el objetivo de indagar la relacion entre el tiempo y la literatura y problematizar el modo en que entendemos la historia literaria. Para ello, analizaremos las estrategias deconstruccionistas desplegadas por el critico frances (como la ironia y la paradoja) que conducen a nociones como plagio por anticipado. Esto nos llevara a una comparacion con otros modos de pensar la historia literaria como los que encontramos en Harold Bloom y Hans-Robert Jauss. Finalmente, nuestro articulo buscara fundamentar la hipotesis segun la cual la problematizacion de la historia literaria conduce a una teoria de la lectura. EnglishThe following article offers an interpretation of Pierre Bayard’s anachronistic criticism in order to look into the relationship between time and literature, and to problematize the way in which we understand literary history. To that end, we will analyze the deconstructionist strategies deployed by the French critic (such as irony and paradox) which lead to notions such as anticipatory plagiarism. This will drive us to a comparison with other manners of thinking literary history, including those we find in Harold Bloom’s and Hans-Robert Jauss’s works. Finally, this article will try to lay the foundation of the hypothesis according to which the questioning of literary history leads to a reading theory. francaisCet article offre une interpretation de la critique anachronique de Pierre Bayard afin d’enqueter la relation entre le temps et la litterature et de problematiser la maniere dont on comprend l’histoire litteraire. Pour ce faire, nous analyserons les strategies deconstructionnistes deployees par le critique francais (comme l’ironie et le paradoxe) qui menent vers des notions telles que le plagiat par anticipation. Cela nous conduira a une comparaison entre les facons de penser l’histoire litteraire chez des auteurs comme Harold Bloom et Hans-Robert Jauss. Finalement, l’article cherchera a poser les bases de l’hypothese selon laquelle la problematisation de l’histoire litteraire conduit a une theorie de la lecture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cedille-Revista de Estudios Franceses\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"221-243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cedille-Revista de Estudios Franceses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21071/CED.V14I.10908\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, ROMANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cedille-Revista de Estudios Franceses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21071/CED.V14I.10908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这篇文章中,我们对皮埃尔·贝亚德的时代错误批评进行了解读,目的是探究时间与文学之间的关系,并质疑我们对文学史的理解方式。在本文中,我们将分析法国评论家所采用的解构主义策略(如反讽和悖论),这些策略导致了预先剽窃等概念。这让我们将其与哈罗德·布鲁姆(Harold Bloom)和汉斯-罗伯特·约斯(Hans-Robert Jauss)的其他文学史思维方式进行了比较。这篇文章的目的是提出一个假设,即对文学历史的质疑导致了一种阅读理论。EnglishThe以下条offers Pierre Bayard ' s an interpretation of anachronistic批评声音time in order to look into the relationship between和文学,and to problematize the way in which we明白literary history。To that end, we will analyze the deconstructionist strategies deployed by the French critic(如:irony and paradox) which lead To notions如对本plagiarism。This will drive us to a比较with other thinking literary它们的历史,包括那些we find in Harold Bloom’s和Hans-Robert Jauss’s works。最后,这条将试着lay the foundation of the hypothesis根据to which the强制of literary history to a reading theory。本文对皮埃尔·贝亚德的不合时宜的批评进行了解读,以探究时间与文学的关系,并质疑人们对文学历史的理解方式。为此,我们将分析法国评论家部署的解构主义策略(如反讽和悖论),这些策略导致了预期剽窃等概念。这将使我们比较哈罗德·布鲁姆和汉斯-罗伯特·约斯等作家对文学历史的思考方式。最后,本文将试图为文学历史的问题化导致阅读理论的假设奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La lectura del tiempo en la obra de Pierre Bayard
espanolEn este articulo ofrecemos una interpretacion de la critica anacronica de Pierre Bayard con el objetivo de indagar la relacion entre el tiempo y la literatura y problematizar el modo en que entendemos la historia literaria. Para ello, analizaremos las estrategias deconstruccionistas desplegadas por el critico frances (como la ironia y la paradoja) que conducen a nociones como plagio por anticipado. Esto nos llevara a una comparacion con otros modos de pensar la historia literaria como los que encontramos en Harold Bloom y Hans-Robert Jauss. Finalmente, nuestro articulo buscara fundamentar la hipotesis segun la cual la problematizacion de la historia literaria conduce a una teoria de la lectura. EnglishThe following article offers an interpretation of Pierre Bayard’s anachronistic criticism in order to look into the relationship between time and literature, and to problematize the way in which we understand literary history. To that end, we will analyze the deconstructionist strategies deployed by the French critic (such as irony and paradox) which lead to notions such as anticipatory plagiarism. This will drive us to a comparison with other manners of thinking literary history, including those we find in Harold Bloom’s and Hans-Robert Jauss’s works. Finally, this article will try to lay the foundation of the hypothesis according to which the questioning of literary history leads to a reading theory. francaisCet article offre une interpretation de la critique anachronique de Pierre Bayard afin d’enqueter la relation entre le temps et la litterature et de problematiser la maniere dont on comprend l’histoire litteraire. Pour ce faire, nous analyserons les strategies deconstructionnistes deployees par le critique francais (comme l’ironie et le paradoxe) qui menent vers des notions telles que le plagiat par anticipation. Cela nous conduira a une comparaison entre les facons de penser l’histoire litteraire chez des auteurs comme Harold Bloom et Hans-Robert Jauss. Finalement, l’article cherchera a poser les bases de l’hypothese selon laquelle la problematisation de l’histoire litteraire conduit a une theorie de la lecture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信