新兴经济体中央商务区的空间使用:监管还是理由?

Mary Amoah , Alexander Boakye Marful , Stephen Appiah Takyi , Owusu Amponsah , Michael Poku-Boansi
{"title":"新兴经济体中央商务区的空间使用:监管还是理由?","authors":"Mary Amoah ,&nbsp;Alexander Boakye Marful ,&nbsp;Stephen Appiah Takyi ,&nbsp;Owusu Amponsah ,&nbsp;Michael Poku-Boansi","doi":"10.1016/j.ugj.2023.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Central Business District (CBD)[1] mimics a jungle where businesses and people compete for the best space and use because of its socioeconomic and political roles in a city. This zone attracts many users and uses, making it a focus of regulative planning, which is perceived as a useful behavioural control tool. However, whether a CBD's space user behaviour and use patterns are attributable solely to zoning guidelines and planning standards is not established. Using a case study design with Kumasi's CBD as the geographic scope, the study explored the patterns in space use within the lens of Ghana's Zoning Guidelines and Planning Standards and the factors informing user behaviour. The study found that space use in the CBD conforms extensively to the permissible activities enshrined in the guidelines, though open spaces and recreational parks are going extinct. However, some use prohibitions outlined in the Zoning Guidelines disconnect from reality and user rationality amid space use competitions. The study suggests that profit maximisation is the critical factor informing use patterns and user behaviour, aside factors like location, statutory demand, inheritance, social influence, and family decisions. The paper concludes that users’ subjective profit motives inform the user behaviour in CBDs of developing economies as against the perceived behavioural control embedded in guidelines and planning standards. It is recommended that attaining and maintaining inclusive and operative space use in the CBDs should integrate routine updating of regulatory frameworks and guidelines underpinned by rational choice models.</p><p>[1] Central Business District.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101266,"journal":{"name":"Urban Governance","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 315-329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Space use in Central Business District of emerging economies: Regulation or rationale?\",\"authors\":\"Mary Amoah ,&nbsp;Alexander Boakye Marful ,&nbsp;Stephen Appiah Takyi ,&nbsp;Owusu Amponsah ,&nbsp;Michael Poku-Boansi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ugj.2023.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Central Business District (CBD)[1] mimics a jungle where businesses and people compete for the best space and use because of its socioeconomic and political roles in a city. This zone attracts many users and uses, making it a focus of regulative planning, which is perceived as a useful behavioural control tool. However, whether a CBD's space user behaviour and use patterns are attributable solely to zoning guidelines and planning standards is not established. Using a case study design with Kumasi's CBD as the geographic scope, the study explored the patterns in space use within the lens of Ghana's Zoning Guidelines and Planning Standards and the factors informing user behaviour. The study found that space use in the CBD conforms extensively to the permissible activities enshrined in the guidelines, though open spaces and recreational parks are going extinct. However, some use prohibitions outlined in the Zoning Guidelines disconnect from reality and user rationality amid space use competitions. The study suggests that profit maximisation is the critical factor informing use patterns and user behaviour, aside factors like location, statutory demand, inheritance, social influence, and family decisions. The paper concludes that users’ subjective profit motives inform the user behaviour in CBDs of developing economies as against the perceived behavioural control embedded in guidelines and planning standards. It is recommended that attaining and maintaining inclusive and operative space use in the CBDs should integrate routine updating of regulatory frameworks and guidelines underpinned by rational choice models.</p><p>[1] Central Business District.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Governance\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 315-329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328623000724\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328623000724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中央商务区(CBD)[1]模仿了一个丛林,由于其在城市中的社会经济和政治角色,企业和人们在这里争夺最佳空间和用途。该区域吸引了许多用户和用途,使其成为监管规划的重点,被视为一种有用的行为控制工具。然而,CBD的空间用户行为和使用模式是否仅可归因于分区指南和规划标准尚未确定。该研究以库马西CBD为地理范围,采用案例研究设计,从加纳分区指南和规划标准的角度探讨了空间使用模式以及影响用户行为的因素。研究发现,尽管开放空间和休闲公园正在消失,但CBD的空间使用在很大程度上符合指南中规定的允许活动。然而,在空间使用竞争中,《分区指南》中列出的一些使用禁令与现实和用户理性脱节。该研究表明,除了位置、法定需求、继承、社会影响和家庭决策等因素外,利润最大化是决定使用模式和用户行为的关键因素。该论文得出结论,用户的主观利润动机反映了发展中经济体CBD中的用户行为,而不是嵌入指导方针和规划标准中的感知行为控制。建议在CBD中实现和保持包容性和可操作性的空间使用,应结合以理性选择模式为基础的监管框架和指导方针的日常更新。[1] 中央商务区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Space use in Central Business District of emerging economies: Regulation or rationale?

The Central Business District (CBD)[1] mimics a jungle where businesses and people compete for the best space and use because of its socioeconomic and political roles in a city. This zone attracts many users and uses, making it a focus of regulative planning, which is perceived as a useful behavioural control tool. However, whether a CBD's space user behaviour and use patterns are attributable solely to zoning guidelines and planning standards is not established. Using a case study design with Kumasi's CBD as the geographic scope, the study explored the patterns in space use within the lens of Ghana's Zoning Guidelines and Planning Standards and the factors informing user behaviour. The study found that space use in the CBD conforms extensively to the permissible activities enshrined in the guidelines, though open spaces and recreational parks are going extinct. However, some use prohibitions outlined in the Zoning Guidelines disconnect from reality and user rationality amid space use competitions. The study suggests that profit maximisation is the critical factor informing use patterns and user behaviour, aside factors like location, statutory demand, inheritance, social influence, and family decisions. The paper concludes that users’ subjective profit motives inform the user behaviour in CBDs of developing economies as against the perceived behavioural control embedded in guidelines and planning standards. It is recommended that attaining and maintaining inclusive and operative space use in the CBDs should integrate routine updating of regulatory frameworks and guidelines underpinned by rational choice models.

[1] Central Business District.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信