{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行限制对加拿大成人先天性心脏病护理的影响:全国调查","authors":"Ruochen Tony Mao MD , Luc Beauchesne MD, FRCPC , Ariane Marelli MD, FRCPC , Candice Silversides MD, FRCPC , Annie Dore MD, FRCPC , Javier Ganame MD, PhD , Michelle Keir MD, MSc, FRCPC , Rafael Alonso-Gonzalez MD, MSc , Isabelle Vonder Muhll BSc, MD, FRCPC , Jasmine Grewal MD, FRCPC , Anne Williams MD, FRCPC, FACC , Payam Dehghani MD, FRCPC , Samuel Siu MD, SM, MBA, FRCPC , Amer Johri MD, FRCPC , Elisabeth Bedard MD, FRCPC , Judith Therrien MD, FRCPC , Doug Hayami MDCM, FRCPC , Catherine Kells MD, FRCPC, FACC , Robin A. Ducas BSc, MD, FRCPC","doi":"10.1016/j.cjcpc.2023.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted health care access across Canada with the reduction in in-person evaluations. The aim of the study was to examine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to health care services among the Canadian population with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All Canadian adult congenital heart affiliated centres were contacted and asked to collect data on outpatient clinic and procedural volumes for the 2019 and 2020 calendar years. A survey was sent detailing questions on clinic and procedural volumes and wait times before and after pandemic restrictions. Descriptive statistics were used with the Student <em>t</em>-test to compare groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 2019, there were 19,326 ACHD clinic visits across Canada and only 296 (1.5%) virtual clinic visits. However, during the first year of the pandemic, there were 20,532 clinic visits and 11,412 (56%) virtual visits (<em>P</em> < 0.0001). There were no differences in procedural volumes (electrophysiology, cardiac surgery, and percutaneous intervention) between 2019 and 2020. The mean estimated wait times (months) before the pandemic vs the pandemic were as follows: nonurgent consult 5.4 ± 2.6 vs 6.6 ± 4.2 (<em>P</em> = 0.65), ACHD surgery 6.0 ± 3.5 vs 7.0 ± 4.6 (<em>P</em> = 0.47), electrophysiology procedures 6.3 ± 3.3 vs 5.7 ± 3.3 (<em>P</em> = 0.72), and percutaneous intervention 4.6 ± 3.9 vs 4.4 ± 2.3 (<em>P</em> = 0.74).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>During the pandemic and restrictions of social distancing, the use of virtual clinic visits helped to maintain continuity in ACHD clinical care, with 56% of ACHD visits being virtual. The procedural volumes and wait times for consultation and percutaneous and surgical interventions were not delayed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100249,"journal":{"name":"CJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Restrictions on the Provision of Adult Congenital Heart Disease Care Across Canada: A National Survey\",\"authors\":\"Ruochen Tony Mao MD , Luc Beauchesne MD, FRCPC , Ariane Marelli MD, FRCPC , Candice Silversides MD, FRCPC , Annie Dore MD, FRCPC , Javier Ganame MD, PhD , Michelle Keir MD, MSc, FRCPC , Rafael Alonso-Gonzalez MD, MSc , Isabelle Vonder Muhll BSc, MD, FRCPC , Jasmine Grewal MD, FRCPC , Anne Williams MD, FRCPC, FACC , Payam Dehghani MD, FRCPC , Samuel Siu MD, SM, MBA, FRCPC , Amer Johri MD, FRCPC , Elisabeth Bedard MD, FRCPC , Judith Therrien MD, FRCPC , Doug Hayami MDCM, FRCPC , Catherine Kells MD, FRCPC, FACC , Robin A. Ducas BSc, MD, FRCPC\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjcpc.2023.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted health care access across Canada with the reduction in in-person evaluations. The aim of the study was to examine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to health care services among the Canadian population with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All Canadian adult congenital heart affiliated centres were contacted and asked to collect data on outpatient clinic and procedural volumes for the 2019 and 2020 calendar years. A survey was sent detailing questions on clinic and procedural volumes and wait times before and after pandemic restrictions. Descriptive statistics were used with the Student <em>t</em>-test to compare groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 2019, there were 19,326 ACHD clinic visits across Canada and only 296 (1.5%) virtual clinic visits. However, during the first year of the pandemic, there were 20,532 clinic visits and 11,412 (56%) virtual visits (<em>P</em> < 0.0001). There were no differences in procedural volumes (electrophysiology, cardiac surgery, and percutaneous intervention) between 2019 and 2020. The mean estimated wait times (months) before the pandemic vs the pandemic were as follows: nonurgent consult 5.4 ± 2.6 vs 6.6 ± 4.2 (<em>P</em> = 0.65), ACHD surgery 6.0 ± 3.5 vs 7.0 ± 4.6 (<em>P</em> = 0.47), electrophysiology procedures 6.3 ± 3.3 vs 5.7 ± 3.3 (<em>P</em> = 0.72), and percutaneous intervention 4.6 ± 3.9 vs 4.4 ± 2.3 (<em>P</em> = 0.74).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>During the pandemic and restrictions of social distancing, the use of virtual clinic visits helped to maintain continuity in ACHD clinical care, with 56% of ACHD visits being virtual. The procedural volumes and wait times for consultation and percutaneous and surgical interventions were not delayed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772812923001264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772812923001264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景新冠肺炎大流行显著影响了加拿大各地的医疗保健服务,住院评估减少。该研究的目的是研究新冠肺炎大流行对加拿大成人先天性心脏病(ACHD)患者获得医疗保健服务的影响。方法联系所有加拿大成人先天性心脏附属中心,并要求其收集2019和2020日历年的门诊和手术量数据。发送了一份调查,详细说明了疫情限制前后诊所和手术量以及等待时间的问题。描述性统计与Student t检验用于比较各组。结果2019年,加拿大全国共有19326次ACHD诊所就诊,只有296次(1.5%)虚拟诊所就诊。然而,在疫情的第一年,共有20532次临床就诊和11412次(56%)虚拟就诊(P<;0.0001)。2019年至2020年,手术量(电生理学、心脏手术和经皮介入治疗)没有差异。大流行前与大流行前的平均估计等待时间(月)如下:非紧急会诊5.4±2.6 vs 6.6±4.2(P=0.65),ACHD手术6.0±3.5 vs 7.0±4.6(P=0.47),电生理程序6.3±3.3 vs 5.7±3.3(P=0.72),经皮介入治疗4.6±3.9 vs 4.4±2.3(P=0.74)。结论在疫情和社交距离限制期间,虚拟诊所就诊有助于保持ACHD临床护理的连续性,56%的ACHD就诊是虚拟的。会诊、经皮和手术干预的手术量和等待时间没有延迟。
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Restrictions on the Provision of Adult Congenital Heart Disease Care Across Canada: A National Survey
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted health care access across Canada with the reduction in in-person evaluations. The aim of the study was to examine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to health care services among the Canadian population with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD).
Methods
All Canadian adult congenital heart affiliated centres were contacted and asked to collect data on outpatient clinic and procedural volumes for the 2019 and 2020 calendar years. A survey was sent detailing questions on clinic and procedural volumes and wait times before and after pandemic restrictions. Descriptive statistics were used with the Student t-test to compare groups.
Results
In 2019, there were 19,326 ACHD clinic visits across Canada and only 296 (1.5%) virtual clinic visits. However, during the first year of the pandemic, there were 20,532 clinic visits and 11,412 (56%) virtual visits (P < 0.0001). There were no differences in procedural volumes (electrophysiology, cardiac surgery, and percutaneous intervention) between 2019 and 2020. The mean estimated wait times (months) before the pandemic vs the pandemic were as follows: nonurgent consult 5.4 ± 2.6 vs 6.6 ± 4.2 (P = 0.65), ACHD surgery 6.0 ± 3.5 vs 7.0 ± 4.6 (P = 0.47), electrophysiology procedures 6.3 ± 3.3 vs 5.7 ± 3.3 (P = 0.72), and percutaneous intervention 4.6 ± 3.9 vs 4.4 ± 2.3 (P = 0.74).
Conclusions
During the pandemic and restrictions of social distancing, the use of virtual clinic visits helped to maintain continuity in ACHD clinical care, with 56% of ACHD visits being virtual. The procedural volumes and wait times for consultation and percutaneous and surgical interventions were not delayed.