奥利瓦和米格尔·萨布科的新哲学

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
J. Fernández
{"title":"奥利瓦和米格尔·萨布科的新哲学","authors":"J. Fernández","doi":"10.18239/ENSAYOS.V27I0.245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resumen: El presente articulo replantea el problema de la autoria de la Nueva filosofia de la naturaleza del hombre de una manera novedosa: desde el contenido de la obra. Buscando resolver el problema de la ambiguedad y contradicciones de la misma, propone la hipotesis de que a Miguel Sabuco corresponderia la parte fisiologica y psicosomatica, mientras que Oliva Sabuco habria dotado a esta de una arquitectura filosofica espanola renacentista, socratica cristiana, erasmista y neoestoica. Abstract: The current article again arises the issue of the authorship of the New Philosophy of Man’s Nature in a novel way: from the content of the play.  Trying to solve the problem of its ambiguity and contradictions a new hypothesis is proposed here, that Miguel Sabuco is the author of the physiological and psychosomatic part whereas Oliva Sabuco would have provided it with a Renaissance Spanish philosophical architecture, which at the same time is  Socratic-Christian, Erasmist and Neoestoic.","PeriodicalId":42950,"journal":{"name":"Ensayos-Revista de la Facultad de Educacion de Albacete","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La Nueva Filosofía de Oliva y Miguel Sabuco [The New Philosophy of Oliva and Miguel Sabuco]\",\"authors\":\"J. Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.18239/ENSAYOS.V27I0.245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Resumen: El presente articulo replantea el problema de la autoria de la Nueva filosofia de la naturaleza del hombre de una manera novedosa: desde el contenido de la obra. Buscando resolver el problema de la ambiguedad y contradicciones de la misma, propone la hipotesis de que a Miguel Sabuco corresponderia la parte fisiologica y psicosomatica, mientras que Oliva Sabuco habria dotado a esta de una arquitectura filosofica espanola renacentista, socratica cristiana, erasmista y neoestoica. Abstract: The current article again arises the issue of the authorship of the New Philosophy of Man’s Nature in a novel way: from the content of the play.  Trying to solve the problem of its ambiguity and contradictions a new hypothesis is proposed here, that Miguel Sabuco is the author of the physiological and psychosomatic part whereas Oliva Sabuco would have provided it with a Renaissance Spanish philosophical architecture, which at the same time is  Socratic-Christian, Erasmist and Neoestoic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ensayos-Revista de la Facultad de Educacion de Albacete\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ensayos-Revista de la Facultad de Educacion de Albacete\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18239/ENSAYOS.V27I0.245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ensayos-Revista de la Facultad de Educacion de Albacete","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18239/ENSAYOS.V27I0.245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

个人资料:关于重新种植的具体问题,关于重新种植的问题,关于重新种植的问题,关于重新种植的问题,关于重新种植的问题,关于重新种植的问题,关于重新种植的问题,关于重新种植的问题,关于重新种植的问题。在解析器el问题de la ambiguedad y contradicciones de la堂吉诃德,倡言la hipotesis德,米格尔Sabuco corresponderia拉杰克逊fisiologica y psicosomatica mientras,奥利瓦Sabuco habria dotado斯塔de una arquitectura filosofica西班牙renacentista socratica cristiana, erasmista y neoestoica。摘要:本文以一种新颖的方式——从该剧的内容出发,再次提出了《人的本性新哲学》的作者问题。为了解决模棱两可和矛盾的问题这里提出了一个新的假设,米格尔·萨布科是生理和身心部分的作者而奥利瓦·萨布科会为它提供一个文艺复兴时期的西班牙哲学建筑,同时也是苏格拉底-基督教,伊拉斯谟和新古典主义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La Nueva Filosofía de Oliva y Miguel Sabuco [The New Philosophy of Oliva and Miguel Sabuco]
Resumen: El presente articulo replantea el problema de la autoria de la Nueva filosofia de la naturaleza del hombre de una manera novedosa: desde el contenido de la obra. Buscando resolver el problema de la ambiguedad y contradicciones de la misma, propone la hipotesis de que a Miguel Sabuco corresponderia la parte fisiologica y psicosomatica, mientras que Oliva Sabuco habria dotado a esta de una arquitectura filosofica espanola renacentista, socratica cristiana, erasmista y neoestoica. Abstract: The current article again arises the issue of the authorship of the New Philosophy of Man’s Nature in a novel way: from the content of the play.  Trying to solve the problem of its ambiguity and contradictions a new hypothesis is proposed here, that Miguel Sabuco is the author of the physiological and psychosomatic part whereas Oliva Sabuco would have provided it with a Renaissance Spanish philosophical architecture, which at the same time is  Socratic-Christian, Erasmist and Neoestoic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信