准数学教师在纸笔测试和动态几何环境下的问题提出能力与创造性的比较

IF 3.5 2区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Pub Date : 2020-10-24 DOI:10.17583/REDIMAT.2020.3879

M. Öçal, Tuğrul Kar, Gürsel Güler, A. Ipek

{"title":"准数学教师在纸笔测试和动态几何环境下的问题提出能力与创造性的比较","authors":"M. Öçal, Tuğrul Kar, Gürsel Güler, A. Ipek","doi":"10.17583/REDIMAT.2020.3879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate the similarities and differences between prospective mathematics teachers’ creative thinking skills in paper-pencil test and on a Geogebra-supported environment in terms of problem-posing. This case study used purposive sampling method for determining the participants. Findings revealed that the activities carried out in the GeoGebra-supported environment were insufficient to produce creative problems, and GeoGebra’s main utility to prospective teachers was in identifying their mistakes related to mathematical concepts and discrepancies among numerical values of the problems posed. The reasons for the low achievement in posing problem were discussed: These were; (i) lack of problem-posing experience, (ii) the structure of problem-posing activity, and (iii) prospective teachers’ mathematical content knowledge.","PeriodicalId":48084,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Research in Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of prospective mathematics teachers’ problem posing abilities in paper-pencil test and on dynamic geometry environment in terms of creativity\",\"authors\":\"M. Öçal, Tuğrul Kar, Gürsel Güler, A. Ipek\",\"doi\":\"10.17583/REDIMAT.2020.3879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to investigate the similarities and differences between prospective mathematics teachers’ creative thinking skills in paper-pencil test and on a Geogebra-supported environment in terms of problem-posing. This case study used purposive sampling method for determining the participants. Findings revealed that the activities carried out in the GeoGebra-supported environment were insufficient to produce creative problems, and GeoGebra’s main utility to prospective teachers was in identifying their mistakes related to mathematical concepts and discrepancies among numerical values of the problems posed. The reasons for the low achievement in posing problem were discussed: These were; (i) lack of problem-posing experience, (ii) the structure of problem-posing activity, and (iii) prospective teachers’ mathematical content knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Research in Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Research in Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17583/REDIMAT.2020.3879\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Research in Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17583/REDIMAT.2020.3879","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在探讨未来数学教师在纸笔测试和geogebra支持环境下创造性思维能力在问题提出方面的异同。本案例研究采用有目的的抽样方法来确定参与者。调查结果显示，在GeoGebra支持的环境中进行的活动不足以产生创造性的问题，GeoGebra对未来教师的主要效用是识别他们在数学概念方面的错误和所提出问题的数值之间的差异。讨论了教师出题成绩不高的原因:(1)缺乏提出问题的经验;(2)提出问题活动的结构;(3)未来教师的数学内容知识。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparison of prospective mathematics teachers’ problem posing abilities in paper-pencil test and on dynamic geometry environment in terms of creativity

This study aims to investigate the similarities and differences between prospective mathematics teachers’ creative thinking skills in paper-pencil test and on a Geogebra-supported environment in terms of problem-posing. This case study used purposive sampling method for determining the participants. Findings revealed that the activities carried out in the GeoGebra-supported environment were insufficient to produce creative problems, and GeoGebra’s main utility to prospective teachers was in identifying their mistakes related to mathematical concepts and discrepancies among numerical values of the problems posed. The reasons for the low achievement in posing problem were discussed: These were; (i) lack of problem-posing experience, (ii) the structure of problem-posing activity, and (iii) prospective teachers’ mathematical content knowledge.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

17.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： An official journal of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), JRME is the premier research journal in mathematics education and is devoted to the interests of teachers and researchers at all levels--preschool through college. JRME is a forum for disciplined inquiry into the teaching and learning of mathematics. The editors encourage submissions including: -Research reports, addressing important research questions and issues in mathematics education, -Brief reports of research, -Research commentaries on issues pertaining to mathematics education research, and -Book reviews.