Polar OwnIndex不是有氧训练状态的可靠指标。

F. Köteles, Z. Dömötör, T. Berkes, R. Szemerszky
{"title":"Polar OwnIndex不是有氧训练状态的可靠指标。","authors":"F. Köteles, Z. Dömötör, T. Berkes, R. Szemerszky","doi":"10.1556/036.102.2015.4.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polar watches with heart rate monitoring function have become popular among recreational and professional athletes. In addition to monitoring functions, they calculate a specific index called OwnIndex which is claimed to measure aerobic training status. The current research attempted to shed light on the factors determining the OwnIndex. In Study 1, OwnIndex calculated by the RS-400 Polar watch was estimated using anthropometric (gender, age, height, weight), cardiovascular (resting HR, RMSSD), and exercise-related (maximal oxygen uptake, self-reported physical activity) data of 45 young adults. In Study 2, the OwnIndex was measured in 21 young adults twice, first with self-reported physical activity set to the lowest, then to the highest value. In the regression analysis (Study 1), the only significant predictor of OwnIndex was self-reported physical activity (R² = 0.883; β = 0.915, p < 0.001). A significant difference with a large effect size (t(20) = -16.657, p <0.001, d = 3.635) and no significant correlation (r = -0.32; p = 0.155) were found between the OwnIndices calculated with different levels of activity in Study 2. As anthropometric and cardiac variables play a practically negligible role in the calculation of the OwnIndex, it cannot be considered an appropriate measure of aerobic fitness.","PeriodicalId":7167,"journal":{"name":"Acta physiologica Hungarica","volume":"102 4 1","pages":"419-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1556/036.102.2015.4.9","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polar OwnIndex is not a reliable indicator of aerobic training status.\",\"authors\":\"F. Köteles, Z. Dömötör, T. Berkes, R. Szemerszky\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/036.102.2015.4.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Polar watches with heart rate monitoring function have become popular among recreational and professional athletes. In addition to monitoring functions, they calculate a specific index called OwnIndex which is claimed to measure aerobic training status. The current research attempted to shed light on the factors determining the OwnIndex. In Study 1, OwnIndex calculated by the RS-400 Polar watch was estimated using anthropometric (gender, age, height, weight), cardiovascular (resting HR, RMSSD), and exercise-related (maximal oxygen uptake, self-reported physical activity) data of 45 young adults. In Study 2, the OwnIndex was measured in 21 young adults twice, first with self-reported physical activity set to the lowest, then to the highest value. In the regression analysis (Study 1), the only significant predictor of OwnIndex was self-reported physical activity (R² = 0.883; β = 0.915, p < 0.001). A significant difference with a large effect size (t(20) = -16.657, p <0.001, d = 3.635) and no significant correlation (r = -0.32; p = 0.155) were found between the OwnIndices calculated with different levels of activity in Study 2. As anthropometric and cardiac variables play a practically negligible role in the calculation of the OwnIndex, it cannot be considered an appropriate measure of aerobic fitness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta physiologica Hungarica\",\"volume\":\"102 4 1\",\"pages\":\"419-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1556/036.102.2015.4.9\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta physiologica Hungarica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/036.102.2015.4.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta physiologica Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/036.102.2015.4.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

具有心率监测功能的极地手表在休闲和专业运动员中很受欢迎。除了监测功能外,他们还计算了一个名为OwnIndex的特定指数,据称该指数可以衡量有氧训练的状态。目前的研究试图揭示决定OwnIndex的因素。在研究1中,利用45名年轻人的人体测量(性别、年龄、身高、体重)、心血管(静息心率、RMSSD)和运动相关(最大摄氧量、自我报告的身体活动)数据,通过RS-400 Polar手表计算出OwnIndex。在研究2中,对21名年轻人进行了两次OwnIndex测量,首先将自我报告的体力活动设置为最低值,然后设置为最高值。在回归分析(研究1)中,OwnIndex的唯一显著预测因子是自我报告的体育活动(R²= 0.883;β = 0.915, p < 0.001)。差异显著且效应量大(t(20) = -16.657, p <0.001, d = 3.635),无显著相关性(r = -0.32;p = 0.155),在研究2中不同运动水平计算的OwnIndices之间存在差异。由于人体测量和心脏变量在OwnIndex的计算中所起的作用几乎可以忽略不计,因此它不能被认为是一种适当的有氧健身指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Polar OwnIndex is not a reliable indicator of aerobic training status.
Polar watches with heart rate monitoring function have become popular among recreational and professional athletes. In addition to monitoring functions, they calculate a specific index called OwnIndex which is claimed to measure aerobic training status. The current research attempted to shed light on the factors determining the OwnIndex. In Study 1, OwnIndex calculated by the RS-400 Polar watch was estimated using anthropometric (gender, age, height, weight), cardiovascular (resting HR, RMSSD), and exercise-related (maximal oxygen uptake, self-reported physical activity) data of 45 young adults. In Study 2, the OwnIndex was measured in 21 young adults twice, first with self-reported physical activity set to the lowest, then to the highest value. In the regression analysis (Study 1), the only significant predictor of OwnIndex was self-reported physical activity (R² = 0.883; β = 0.915, p < 0.001). A significant difference with a large effect size (t(20) = -16.657, p <0.001, d = 3.635) and no significant correlation (r = -0.32; p = 0.155) were found between the OwnIndices calculated with different levels of activity in Study 2. As anthropometric and cardiac variables play a practically negligible role in the calculation of the OwnIndex, it cannot be considered an appropriate measure of aerobic fitness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta physiologica Hungarica
Acta physiologica Hungarica 医学-生理学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6.0 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信